Obama
It is a fake scandal. It is not optimal.
Hillary
What difference does it make?
Obama
It is a fake scandal. It is not optimal.
Hillary
What difference does it make?
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8XrE0FSQv4]
www.climatemonitor.it/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/1974.pdf
This was of course before Mikey erased the LIA
h/t to omnologos
Someone on HuffPo is arguing with me, saying that I am wrong about the Arctic cold – because the green line is the same as in the 1958 graph.
Since Hansen first warned us in 1988, CO2 has risen 50 PPM. That is the atmospheric equivalent of five additional people in the Rose Bowl.
You can see four of them wearing red, and the other one is in the bathroom.
The precautionary principle demands that we shut down our energy infrastructure, and replace it with some sort of renewable energy.
A guy on YouTube said that there is plenty of renewable energy, and Obama repeated that in a speech, so it only makes sense to take multi-trillion dollar meaningless token action against some imaginary future apocalypse which Bill McKibben had a dream about once.