Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- Macha on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Gerald Machnee on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Macha on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- JohnFrancis on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- John Francis on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Stuart Hamish on Extreme Weather
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime
Which gives us a clue of the variability that river system experiences and the futility of trying to control natural weather events. Mitigation would have required moving human activities out of future harms way. It is not to late to do the right thing for the nations future generations, such as relocating at risk habitation and personal property. They should be able to use the land for agricultural purposes if they are willing to accept any losses that will occur.
I have a small section of my property with that restriction and my neighbor has a number of acres that are restricted from structures due to potential flooding.