Bill Goodman accuses me of doctoring a 1975 National Academy Of Sciences graph.
www.sciencenews.org/view/download/id/37739/name/CHILLING_POSSIBILITIES
I’m guessing that Bill voted for Obama – twice.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
Recent Comments
- Conrad Ziefle on The World’s Worst Scientists
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Jack the Insider on Doubling Energy Costs
- Conrad Ziefle on Doubling Energy Costs
- Disillusioned on Doubling Energy Costs
- Francis Barnett on Doubling Energy Costs
Link goes to Page Not Found
Interesting. Appears Science News is trying to hide the evidence.
I changed the link to one located on the web archive.
Wikipedia has that graph up Steve…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Global_cooling.jpg
along with a graph showing temps lower now…..
His second post is even more stupid than the first.
Bill isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed when it comes to reading comprehension 😉 … or perhaps he works in climate science where they just make up missing and/or future data as required!!
Well, from Bill’s perspective, one that has modern day charlatan scientist (and politicians) “Projecting” doom and gloom out into the distant future with charts that “Hockey Stick” into a cataclysmic end of days if we don’t change the world NOW.
I see where he struggles with the fact that in years past where the scientist and meteorologist were actually honest truth telling folks who just did their jobs instead of distorting truth for a politically money scamming ginned up LIE’s.
I can see why he is confused, his reality is distored.
Poor Chap or rather poor Chump.
But why would you post a graph from 1975 when there are graphs that are from 2013?
You CHOSE to post a graph that lacked important available data. Get it?
Why did you chose a graph incomplete in an important way?
Perhaps next you can “prove” Israel does not exist by posting a map from 1946.
Bill, you are digging yourself deeper and deeper into a hole.
Do you believe that the past changes over time? Do you believe that it is OK for NASA to alter pre-1975 temperature records? Perhaps your real name is Winston Smith?
History isn’t what it used to be.
Apparently, even with a chance here to redeem yourself, you have failed. Better to be silent, and have others believe you may be remedial, than to comment, and remove all doubt.
Bill Goodman,
The 1975 NAS graph is important history and shows the fallacy of extrapolation of short trends. In those days the 30 years of cooling led the chicken littles to worry about an impending return of a little ice age or even the plunge into a full blown ice age. Similarly, the thirty years of warming following scared the bejesus out of those with blinders on for historical climate change leading to the forecast of catastrophic global warming. Are you too so blind as not to see the lesson?
He has been banned, and the point I am making is that the data has been tampered with.
“I’m guessing that Bill voted for Obama – twice.”
I presume you are working under the assumption that everyone who went to college is a liberal.
I voted for Obama once and McCain in 2008.
I voted for Reagan twice.
Ironically, people like you often had not voted for Reagan. (e.g. Limbaugh never voted for Reagan)
So after watching Obama nearly double the national debt and break almost every campaign promise, you voted for him in 2012?
Yes, that made me laugh out loud too….
Bill, either they lied in 1975…or they are lying now
…you pick
But if you choose 1975…keep in mind they said they were right then too
They were dead certain then.
and even those they were dead wrong….
…they are dead certain again now
Wow. Voted for Skeeter in 2012. That explains it all. Wow.
Even with massive fraud, still Obama lost about seven million votes in 2012. Our friend Bill may be the only person in the nation who has his voting pattern.
I voted for Reagan. Cease with the DumbA$$ projection!
Makes me wonder how many people visit this site each day and shake their head with disgust because they don’t have the wherewithal to understand the arguments that are presented here.
47%
Lil’ Bill’s head must spin at hypersonic velocity when you post the GIF’s of the “adjustments” (Read: Fraudulent tampering) of the historical temperature records perpetrated by Algore’s sockpuppet, James “I Luvz Me Sum Handcuffs!” Hansen. 😀
Despite naming Ronald Reagan as his greatest influence, Limbaugh never actually voted for him because he didn’t register to vote until he [Limbaugh] was 35. He probably never voted for Ike either.
We have a AGW lovin’ regurgitator of libtard talking points that luvs him some Ronnie… yeah riiight. A guy claims to be proud to have voted for Reagan, but then states that he voted for B. Hussein for his second term. We have one mixed up fellow.
” Limbaugh never actually voted for him because he didn’t register to vote until he [Limbaugh] was 35. ”
Where did you get this anyway?
I have listened since sometime in the early 90’s .. used to tape the pgm at home and replay after work (these were the days before internet) … don’t ever recall this being discussed …
Dr Don Easterbrooke has shown original temp data sets that shows the high priests of doom have been manipulating temp data sets to further their religious beliefs!!!
And this was shown in front of a U.S.senate Hearing !!
Enjoy >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI