Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- William on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Mac on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
Climate Scientists Confused About That “Down Under” Thing
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Laden’s confused about a lot of things.
If by ‘geography’ you mean ‘LSD’, then I would say probably in the past few hours.
“1) Santa does not live in s. Hemispjphere. 2) the #AGW problem is summer Arctic Sea ice melt.” – laden
Watch as the “AGW problem” becomes ever more narrowly defined.
As I pointed out to Greg, there is no Santa, and models predicted southern ice decline, too.
Don’t tell Toure, you will ruin his Christmas!
“MSNBC host Toure on Monday decided to weigh in on the five-day-old “controversy” surrounding Megyn Kelly’s “Santa is white” remarks.
“I, for one, am glad Santa is black because I don’t want my kids worshiping some white dude who flies in to give them stuff,” Toure said. “Thinking a benevolent white man gives them stuff every year is good training for a life on welfare.”
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/12/16/mnsbc-hosts-bizarre-take-on-black-santa-it-involves-obama/
Let’s not confuse Greg Laden and Peter Gleick with scientists.
Climate philosophy is about as scientific as sociology anthropology or history in the hands of Winston Smith……….corruptocrats with Piled on High and Deep stamps of approval
Actually his confusion is fairly common in the warmista crowd. They have a tendency to have a very provincial view of the world. (something akin to solipsism)
Did any one get Peter Gleick’s Twitter post. He put Climate change in same category as Santa, Mrs. Claus, Superman, flying penguins and fireworks.
I see Mann jumped in on Peter G’s third Tweet on his Blog Post
Mann said This
Michael E. Mann ?@MichaelEMann 5h
Great @HuffPostGreen #ClimateChange piece by @PeterGleick (http://huff.to/1bUoAof ) brings out Tolkienesque Troll Army. #TheyHaveACaveTroll
Got to love how a world Climate scientist responds to a Blog post that has no scientific merit regarding imaginary people who if you believe in them they can and will be real including Climate Change
Words containing Hash tags is a favorite item M. Mann uses most times and adds to his comments like a little child that has not gotten their way.
“brings out Tolkienesque Troll Army. #TheyHaveACaveTroll” Mann oh Mann
Apparently Greg Laden is never embarrassed by being wrong multiple times in the same post. Or he is too stupid or dishonest to know when he is wrong.
It’s called the ‘Gleick Syndrome’.
Greg Laden
“Models do NOT predict southern SEA ICE reduction.” [Twitter]
Laden has no shame. He is wrong about the models not predicting / projecting / scenaroing 😉 a reduction in Antarctica sea ice. The IPCC clearly says they did and admit the discrepancy. Yet we are the deniers. How does this scam work again?