a major puzzle in the global warming debate: why computer models have shown more significant warming than actual temperature data.
Fourteen years making the same excuse, and these geniuses still haven’t fixed the models.
a major puzzle in the global warming debate: why computer models have shown more significant warming than actual temperature data.
Fourteen years making the same excuse, and these geniuses still haven’t fixed the models.
Glad to see you sticking to the science of global warming. You are full of shit, but at least you aren’t doing political right wing insanity at the moment. Kudos.
Why do you hate the founding fathers of the US so much?
GISS, NASA, and NOAA data manipulation as outlined by comparing their own charts … Old vs New… THAT isn’t full of shit??
They chill the past and warm the present…. You’ve Deep Throated the whole Global Warming Scam and are choking on it…
Psychologist John Ray confirms the cult nature of climate alarm today, by relating it to a well known “super activist phase”:
“Warmists have now recovered from the fact that there is no warming going on and that all their predictions were wrong. And they have recovered just as Mrs Martin did: By finding a convenient but invisible explanation for why the world has been spared disaster. In the Warmist case they say that the warming is still going on but the extra heat is somehow magically slipping past both the ocean and terrestrial surfaces and burying itself in the ocean deeps. The fact that heat tends to rise rather than sink doesn’t seem to worry them. And the fact that the ocean deeps are known mainly for the extreme stability of their temperature doesn’t bother them either.
And now that they have that “explanation’ for their prophecy failure, they are going on to the next phase recorded by Festinger: They are becoming more fanatical than ever and are proselytizing frantically — as you will see below.”
http://antigreen.blogspot.com/2013/12/warmists-now-in-super-activist-phase-of.html
The reason the models are wrong is simple. The models assume that heat passes freely through the surface of water. A warm day means a warmer ocean. This is not the case. The surface of the ocean will allow radiation to pass through but physical heat from a heated gas is blocked by surface tension. If you find this hard to believe try to heat the surface of water using a paint stripping heat gun. Besides the energy entering the ocean by radiation there is no additional heat build up and it therefore follows that Anthropogenic Global Warming is total nonsense.
As long as the premise of the model is that CO2 drives the atmospheric temperature then they can never fix the model.
Hmmm…
The missing heat seems to have landed in Australia…
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/2013-australias-hottest-year-on-record-20131220-2zqpf.html
The Australian version of the Guardian. It was once an honourable publication but prints rubbish these days.
Any honest study of ocean temperature data going back to the 1950s would conclude that there really isn’t any data. Even with the new Argo program we are not doing too much better than measuring random fish farts.
Trenberth is either a first class loonie or he is earning money from the scam.
Any sane person listening to him talk about missing heat could not help but come to the same conclusion.
http://youtu.be/868nr1Pgxw0