U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend
New York Times Published: January 26, 1989
After examining climate data extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in average temperatures or rainfall in the United States over that entire period.
While the nation’s weather in individual years or even for periods of years has been hotter or cooler and drier or wetter than in other periods, the new study shows that over the last century there has been no trend in one direction or another.
The study, made by scientists for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was published in the current issue of Geophysical Research Letters. It is based on temperature and precipitation readings taken at weather stations around the country from 1895 to 1987.
U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend – New York Times
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on UK Officially Sucks
- James Snook on UK Officially Sucks
- James Snook on UK Officially Sucks
- James Snook on UK Officially Sucks
- John Francis on UK Officially Sucks
- David M Kitting on UK Officially Sucks
- Terry Shipman on UK Officially Sucks
- Reid on UK Officially Sucks
- Billyjack on UK Officially Sucks
- arn on UK Officially Sucks
Thankfully government scientists have since adjusted their thinking and the data, and that is why the winters are now so warm.
Well, if there was no warming up to 1987, and there has been no warming since 1997…hmmm….
That kind of narrows it down a bit, doesn’t it?
And during that period, 1987 to 1997, there were was a major volcanic erruption, Pinotubo, which cooled the earth for several years!
There has been a clear steady takeover of leadership roles since that time. It’s highly likely those who conducted the study then are no longer with NOAA, or have been steadily bribed into compliance.
Is there more money in not finding global warming or finding global warming?
That’s the problem.
The money is in finding the answer, not in finding the truth.
Is it the real problem – or is it the favored explanation?
IMO that is the only problem.
There was no warming up until 6 years ago for the US then there was a lot of warming.
AGW is total bull shit. Just get rid of the commies before they get rid of you.
You’ll enjoy this:
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/18/reddit-bans-comments-from-global-warming-skeptics/
Hansen was probably as hot under the collar about that report as everyone was at the hearing several months earlier.
Paul Homewood over at
http://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2013/12/18/snow-cover-above-normal-in-november-for-northern-hemisphere/
has a good idea of which direction we are going.
That’s when NOAA was an organization that had integrity and practiced science, not propaganda like it does now. Very sad.
What a sad way to inform the public that the scientific revolution started by Copernicus in 1543 ended quietly, without public announcement in 1945.
The great mystery is how George Orwell knew what happened and started writing a warning to the public, “Nineteen Eighty-Four”, in 1946.
Ancient mythology was far more scientific than modern government science, as noted elsewhere:
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2013/12/15/does-anybody-real-know-what-tsi-it-is/#comment-56283
Reblogged this on CACA.