The Guardian ignores the opinion of the half of American Meteorological Society members who are climate skeptics, but considers the climate opinion of James Cameron or any other celebrity hack to be front page news.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Ohio Cyclist on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
Perhaps they are ‘The Guardian’ of misinformation, Half truths, out right lies, and of course of their own comments sections when it comes to “deniers”?
Actors and writers of stories are obvious liars..
They ‘think’? I thought one progressive emotes and the rest follow.
Of course the Guardian likes James Cameron. After all, they all work in the same business — make believe!