The Guardian ignores the opinion of the half of American Meteorological Society members who are climate skeptics, but considers the climate opinion of James Cameron or any other celebrity hack to be front page news.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Greenland Ice Update
- Wyoming Gold
- Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Earth, Wind And Fire
- On The Road Again
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
Recent Comments
- Terry Shipman on Wyoming Gold
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on Wyoming Gold
- Bob G on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- conrad ziefle on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Robertvd on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- conrad ziefle on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Bob G on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- conrad ziefle on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Bob G on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Gordon Vigurs on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
Perhaps they are ‘The Guardian’ of misinformation, Half truths, out right lies, and of course of their own comments sections when it comes to “deniers”?
Actors and writers of stories are obvious liars..
They ‘think’? I thought one progressive emotes and the rest follow.
Of course the Guardian likes James Cameron. After all, they all work in the same business — make believe!