I just heard this on NPR
If you thought November was hot, you were right. NOAA says it was the hottest November ever.
It was actually the 96th warmest since 1895 in the US, with 70% of the country below normal temperature.
I just heard this on NPR
If you thought November was hot, you were right. NOAA says it was the hottest November ever.
It was actually the 96th warmest since 1895 in the US, with 70% of the country below normal temperature.
It is actually a bit frightening that the truth about something as simple as temperatures can be twisted way out of line to fit their sickening agenda!
Is there someone that thought November felt hot besides maybe Bill KcKibben ?
Reblogged this on Edonurwayup's Blog and commented:
Commentaries like that also go on the television news casts of the Spanish channel Telemundo.
These folks will never give up. Too much money, influence, and power is involved. Diabolical is the only proper word.
We need to remember, lying pieces of shit have no conscience, morals, ethical foundation or integrity. They also have no problems with degrading themselves or others, mostly due to induced hate through group thought and progressive indoctrination routines…
+10 :o)
I heard that on the news earlier today, and I thought,, “That can’t be right.”
Not sure that NPR meant just in the US. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=251984346 says global. Not that the radio version was clear about the distinction. But even if they meant global, that doesn’t jive with Roy Spencer’s numbers http://www.drroyspencer.com/2013/12/uah-v5-6-global-temperature-update-for-nov-2013-0-19-deg-c/ or RSS. What gives? This seems like an easy thing to check. Maybe, like Pravda, they just say what the government wants said.
It seems that a lot of the NOAA’s November heat came from Russian temperature stations, some of which were reporting around 9°C above normal.
So NPR broadcasts to Siberia? Everybody in an actual populated area is freezing. This is an example of the absurdity of averaging global temperatures together.
If those high anomalous readings in Russia occurred in an area with few other reporting stations nearby, the Crayola techniques of the NOAA could spread those readings over a wider area than is justified, thus skewing estimates of global temperature.
Happened before,
2007, 2008
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/11/15/giss-noaa-ghcn-and-the-odd-russian-temperature-anomaly-its-all-pipes/
and 2009
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/16/russian-iea-claims-cru-tampered-with-climate-data-cherrypicked-warmest-stations/
The warmists love Russia, especially Siberia, despite the fact that’s very cold there.
The more hot air they put out, the hotter the temperature gets
The problem with US temperature records is you are still using Fahrenheit.
Australia used to use that Fahrenheit thingie and the temperatures used to swing wildly all over the place.
When we switched to Centigrade our climate mellowed and the wild temperature swings stopped immediately.
Fahrenheit – that’s your problem right there !
As most things in nature change in logarithmic ways, I propose we institute a logarithmic Fahrenheit scale, that should sort it out.
🙂
The actual wild temperature swings haven’t stopped; you just can’t see them as well with the scrunched up-centigrade scale. It’s pitiful (and a little French).
…scrunched-up…
Rosco, I think you are on to something! We just need to change scales on our thermometers! OK, OK, let’s think… We’ll set our new Zero point somewhere around absolute zero, and our new 100 point somewhere near the surface of the Sun. Wow! Instantly, all Earthly temperature swings are reduced by a factor of 100 or so. Stable climate? Done deal! We’ll probably never see a hurricane again!
I was wondering who still listens to NPR.
NPR = National Propaganda Radio.
Please stop using single month local WEATHER average temperature reports to make statements about CLIMATE CHANGE which is a multi-year issue that is best studied in terms of increases or decrease in the variability (extremes) rather than the averages at some location on the planet. The picture you show of US variability (above average and below average regions of the country just for Nov 2013 is interesting, but NOT because the AVERAGE is high or low. All media, you guys included, never seem to get this point about the “Flaw of Averages” which is name of a good book, by the way.
It is obvious from your message that you have not read my blog before posting. Go away and come back after you do your homework.
Actually, they said US temperatures were cooler than normal, and I see that you agree with them. Global temperatures in November were the highest ever recorded. Talk to the point, quit pretending that NASA was referring to US temps.
[NOAA]
The smudge algorithm was the smudgiest ever compiled.
I bet Russia in December comes out looking “normal”, though temps are below normal through December 18th.
http://www.accuweather.com/en/ru/national/weather-forecast-maps
Try telling that to all the people in both hemispheres who were snowed on and who froze in November. Snow and crop-killing temperatures in both hemispheres simultaneously is not usual activity and is not evidence of global warming. Personally, I would appreciate normal warm days where I live in the Southwest.