I saw an interesting comment on a discussion forum the other day
“Wood for trees is a well known denier site”
Wood for Trees is a graphing site which allows you to plot out temperature data sets, among other things. Apparently actual data is biased towards deniers, which gives the site a bad reputation among alarmists.
Yes, and thermometers are deniers too!
Any factual data is denier stuff of the most insidious kind 😉
Arithmetic is a well known denier and barometric presure is an uber denier.
If the facts are against your “science” just change the science, as in “record snowfall is due to global warming”.
It works quite well with the MSM.
“Wood for trees is a well known denier site”
Seriously, some moron wrote that? Tell that person just to plot the GISS data and bounce it around his/her echo-chamber at SkS or Climate Progress or whatever.
When your job depends on a lie, the truth really hurts.
+1
A tool has a bad comment about a tool.
🙂
Compare HadleyCRUT – WFT vs. their website data. Looks about the same. .8C rise for both since 1850.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1850/to:2014/mean:21
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/
The stupidity we are faced with each day is incredible. It’s worse when talking to brain washed otherwise successful smart people I know personally. They just look at you with a far off stare thinking, “you must watch Fox News”.
Steven,
The reason it is a denier site is that many alarmists do not know how to make
or interpret a graph.
This is not about data. He who doubts the Devil’s Gas denies the existence of the Devil himself.
Who gets to define what is efficient and sustainable?
And the always amusing Denier Land: How deniers view global warming:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Uif1NwcUgMU
😆 I just love it when weenies in their mother’s basement take time from their gaming to play Dr!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UE6iAjEv9dQ
Makes sense if you interpret that as denier of my religion.
Expect Glieck [sp?] to hack the site and bias it in the Alarmist/Warmis direction.
Reblogged this on CACA.
There’s no “adjustment knob” on the site that’s why it’s a “denier” site. /sarc
I assume you’re talking about me, Steven. I did say those words.
You’re right! I apologise.
It appears that woodfortrees is NOT necessarily a dishonest Climate Denier propaganda site, but it IS a place where Climate Deniers can go to cherry pick climate data in order to generate graphs which misrepresent what’s going on, and therefore very popular with them.
My apologies to Paul Clark!
stevengoddard.wordpress.com without a doubt is a dishonest Climate Denier propaganda site. 😉
Deniers of natural variability and cherry pickers extraordinaire have some real projection issues. They ignore massive climate changes of the past, and instead focus on the disco era as somehow being ‘normal’. It takes a serious mental condition to not see the wood for the trees.