“This is simply natural variability,” said National Snow and Ice Data Center director Mark Serreze, who wasn’t part of the NOAA report but praised it. “There is nothing about the year 2013 that provides any evidence that the Arctic is starting a path toward recovery.”
He added: “Looking back 20 years from now, the world will be warmer and we’ll have much less sea ice than today. We’ll see that 2013 was just a temporary respite.”
Sorry Climate Change Skeptics: Arctic Melting Trend Continues Despite Milder Year
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
After this frigid winter and next summer’s tepid melt season, they will be eating plenty of crow.
Heh. Just wait ’til he has grandkiddies:
Funny how he ascribes ‘natural variability’ causing ice to increase but not to its decrease.
Strange stuff that nature.
It is the mental disorder. This kind of ‘reasoning’ begat President Obama.
Actually, saying natural variability for arctic cooling is not as bad as the reason they give for antarctic cooling……warming!! Yep, antarctic cooling is caused by warming. With a straight face and everything.
😆
Well, isn’t fairly well established now that the Arctic ice has varied with the Atlantic Multidecadal & the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (AMO PDO) cycles. Like, Arctic ice was just reaching a new maximum around 1979 after the cycle switched, and now the cycle has switched again so we should see the Arctic ice gain from here on. So, cry Chicken Little cry.
Now the Arctic andAntarctic are gaining ice mass. But in theory soon the Antarctic sea ice extent will start to decline (talk to Joe Bastardi about this), and the Arctic will gain real massive ice extents, and the befuddled fear mongering ecogeeks will scratch their heads and… and then, and then: “LOOK!!! Look at Antarctica, losing sea ice, like our models say. Forget about the measly Arctic.. Antarctica is much more important and its being melted away by CO2!” Um, minor problems, people aren’t going to be so stupid then, and the temperatures world wide are going to be going down down down. Oh, “LOOK, it’s climate change, it’s NOT global warming, never was. Look at Antarctica, not the Arctic, not your freezing back yard. Buy a Prius!”
Hi Andy!
And Tom!
Now I just went over to Caleb’s site to replay my comment above, which I did. But also I noticed again how really deep his continuing daily Arctic weather coverage is, and now with the Arctic cold going all the way down to Texas and nearly Florida, I’m thinking Caleb’s work is really relevant. So another callout to his Arctic coverage:
http://sunriseswansong.wordpress.com/2013/12/02/arctic-sea-ice-recovery-advent
Hi Eric. When I suddenly noticed over 40 visitors from this site at my obscure site, I came here to see what was up. Thanks for your interest.
By the way, for some reason WordPress identified your comment as “spam.” I had to “rescue” it from the Spam Bin. I have no idea why that happened, and it bothers me, as your input is valued.
I think sea-ice is going to do some really unexpected things the next few years, as a prelude to the switch from a warm AMO to a cold one.
Careful, he is also talking to the Angels!
Can you tell by the hand signals?
🙂
20 March 2000
According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”.
“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he said
Every kid knows it’s tin-tungstenate. (That’s an old one…)
27 June 2008
Exclusive: Scientists warn that there may be no ice at North Pole this summer
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/exclusive-scientists-warn-that-there-may-be-no-ice-at-north-pole-this-summer-855406.html
Wrong headline, should be: Serreze Announces Retirement Date
When everyone says “we will see”, the guy has 20 years more of adjusting algorithms, cherry picking data sets, inventing new measures, traveling to Cancun or wherever, and making new 2050 projections.
There are plenty of 20, 30 predictions now on the books to disprove their theories. Plenty of evidence of written history, news articles as well, to support a natural variability. Why would anyone think that in 20 years, anyone will call them on it then? Maybe in 50 years Mark Serreze Jr. can tell our kids how the permanent ice cap over Hudson Bay is quite normal and that his father predicted it.
There has to be consequences by oversight, governing bodies for what’s gone on as this all falls apart. It can’t be “well, we were just mistaken, oops, happens in science.” This has been cooked, deliberate, a political agenda. There must be consequences to see this does not happen again.
Peer review has replaced falsifiable predictions. Until we toss out the peer-review idiots, it’ll continue to be this way.
Yes, all of the nominal “authorities” have been suborned–it’s an outlaw system, a criminal mafia, at work.
Just Serreze’s opinion
So now extremely cold is “mild” and mild is “extreme”?
Yet the believers just keep nodding their heads.
A big hint that the ice is going well… The warmist are on the warpath … New video of ice loss which I think was just released today: http://www.climate.gov/news-features/videos/very-little-old-sea-ice-remains-arctic