Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
Recent Comments
- william on Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- conrad ziefle on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- william on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Peter Carroll on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- arn on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
Just another to add to the 129 climate scandals:
http://notrickszone.com/2012/09/19/eike-institute-anthropogenic-greenhouse-effect-too-weak-doubling-co2-will-lead-only-to-0-58c-warming/
“Using Figure 6, the exact value for climate warming is 0.58°C.
How does this figure compare to the current discussion? This figure is in agreement withLindzen and Choi of MIT [3]. These two scientists quantified the climate sensitivity at 0.5°C using satellite data, i.e. real observations and not dubious computer simulations.
Hermann Harde [4] found a climate sensitivity of 0.62°C using spectroscopic examinations and model calculations.
Conclusion:
The minimal effect of CO2 on climate is not surprising. This is confirmed by both theory and by actual observations and measurements.”
That’s the sound of models being smashed, now wait for the wailing.
Wait for the pink slip and the black list from the greens.
The arctic needs more blankets AND less blankets!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nret1P0AH7o
It wasn’t too long ago Walsh was claiming that the cold air was moving North in the USA and increased storms.
“But there have been hints that it was coming. The 2009 U.S. Climate Impacts Report found that large-scale cold-weather storm systems have gradually tracked to the north in the U.S. over the past 50 years. While the frequency of storms in the middle latitudes has decreased as the climate has warmed, the intensity of those storms has increased. That’s in part because of global warming — hotter air can hold more moisture, so when a storm gathers it can unleash massive amounts of snow. Colder air, by contrast, is drier; if we were in a truly vicious cold snap, like the one that occurred over much of the East Coast during parts of January, we would be unlikely to see heavy snowfall.”
Read more: Snowstorm: East Coast Blizzard Tied to Climate Change – TIME http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1962294,00.html#ixzz2qCGOrSvk
Now, only 4 years later it seems that cold air has changed its mind and wants to spend time in the Southern USA and is causing more storms. Walsh seems capable of being unable to recognize conflicting information and accept that black is white. if it fits the story of the day.
Perhaps Dorothy can get scarecrow Bryan a brain?