Data going back to 1866.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Mike Peinsipp on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Mike Peinsipp on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- conrad ziefle on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
Correlation between lunatic NSA mass spying and the massive loss of orders of American IT industry and defense industry, although graph is still underway.
http://freebeacon.com/boeing-loses-4-5b-contract-with-brazil-nsa-leaks-cited/#
This country is run into the ground by the current clique of idiots in charge and theur clueless helpers.
unrelated, but you may be interested in this about areans and wind turbines.:
http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/01/16/p-e-i-arenas-say-their-new-wind-turbines-an-expensive-burden-want-them-removed/
John M Reynolds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TGbfyPzcLo
No correlation at all. Interesting.
Old Jedi Mind Trick
2/3 of readings above 120 spots have positive temperature anomalies.
2/3 of readings below 100 spots have negative temperature anomalies.
Odds of that being a coincidence are close to zero.
Might be so. Still think correlation is much weaker than expected. Never seen that plot before, by the way.
I wonder if the unadjusted numbers do any better
I’d be curious what the relationship is when you “lag” the temperature by a few years. That is, how does the data look when you compare sunspot count in Year X with temperature in Year X + Y?