Data going back to 1866.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
Recent Comments
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Jack the Insider on Doubling Energy Costs
- Conrad Ziefle on Doubling Energy Costs
- Disillusioned on Doubling Energy Costs
- Francis Barnett on Doubling Energy Costs
- Disillusioned on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
Correlation between lunatic NSA mass spying and the massive loss of orders of American IT industry and defense industry, although graph is still underway.
http://freebeacon.com/boeing-loses-4-5b-contract-with-brazil-nsa-leaks-cited/#
This country is run into the ground by the current clique of idiots in charge and theur clueless helpers.
unrelated, but you may be interested in this about areans and wind turbines.:
http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/01/16/p-e-i-arenas-say-their-new-wind-turbines-an-expensive-burden-want-them-removed/
John M Reynolds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TGbfyPzcLo
No correlation at all. Interesting.
Old Jedi Mind Trick
2/3 of readings above 120 spots have positive temperature anomalies.
2/3 of readings below 100 spots have negative temperature anomalies.
Odds of that being a coincidence are close to zero.
Might be so. Still think correlation is much weaker than expected. Never seen that plot before, by the way.
I wonder if the unadjusted numbers do any better
I’d be curious what the relationship is when you “lag” the temperature by a few years. That is, how does the data look when you compare sunspot count in Year X with temperature in Year X + Y?