arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/timeseries.global.anom.1979-2008
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
Recent Comments
- Peter Carroll on “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- arn on “Climate dread is everywhere”
- arn on Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- Bob G on Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- arn on Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- arn on “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Bob G on Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- arn on Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- arn on Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- Mike Peinsipp on Skynet Becomes Self Aware
Hmmm… Do I detect an upward trend showing ever increasing global sea ice? It is not sine qua non evidence, but it is certainly consistent with all the other data you publish, Steve, showing a global cooling trend.
I think (correct me if I’m wrong) this as as far back as we have satellite records for sea ice… and just as a casual observer I’d say that it looks like a couple of high outliers, and a couple of low outliers that taken together really don’t change the mean much, and otherwise the mean looks like it hangs around 18.75-ish. We don’t have a long record to compare it to, but it kinda looks like what I’d call an emerging picture of normal variation.
Hi
Can you break this down into Arctic and Antarctic graphs?