In actual science, people throw out outliers. But in government climate science they base their entire theory around two carefully cherry picked outliers.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
Recent Comments
- arn on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- conrad ziefle on Warming Twice As Fast
- conrad ziefle on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- dm on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Ohio Cyclist on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Robertvd on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- gordon vigurs on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- arn on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Ed on ChatGPT Research Proposal
- conrad ziefle on ChatGPT Research Proposal
Did I hear 1979? Or maybe you meant ‘in actual science people throw out liars’.
“…‘in actual science people throw out liars’.
Nice idea!
🙂
If we did that in Washington DC we would have to close down the entire city!
😆
The thought makes me smile to, and laugh with glee.
Three outliers. 1979 (the starting point) was an outlier because it came after 30 years of global cooling.