In 1990, brilliant climate scientists said that global warming would cause the Antarctic ice sheet to gain mass, and cause sea levels to rise one metre. (Balancing equations is apparently not part of the climate science curriculum.)
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Disillusioned on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Nicholas McGinley on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Even an expert (i.e., a promulgator of false dogma, these days) is right twice a day…
Playing Satan’s, er, Al Gore’s advocate here, could they have been saying the ice would freeze below the sea level, expand, and thus raise the sea level?
How much added volume would that be?
There is so much wrong with the second paragraph of that article. Other than just calling it overtly stupid, how can you refute it without your head exploding?