The frequency of 100 degree days in the US peaked just below 310 PPM CO2, and has been declining as CO2 has increased. There is absolutely no correlation between hot weather and increasing CO2.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- arn on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- John McLachlan on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Allan Shelton on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
Not disputing but global numbers are where the argument has to be made, IMHO. And those numbers look good too.
There aren’t any accurate global numbers from the 1930s. The US data is by far the best in the world.
So where do the “global numbers come from? Mainly from the USA!
Data records by latitude: http://i34.tinypic.com/2naty6c.png
Back in 2010 E.M. Smith, Verity Jones and Kevin in the UK looked at The ‘Station drop out’ problem Thise article has graphs showing where the remaining data stations are located after the Climastrologists dropped a lot of stations to artificially increase the temperature
Pay close attention to this graph showing most records are from North and Central America especially after around 1990 link
And then look at the breakdown of Raw data stations – North and Central America:
link
Those graphics show that MOST of the Raw data stations are in the USA!
So Steve is really not off base looking at what is happening in the USA since that is where the majority of the data comes from.
“Pay close attention to this graph”…
I love it.
Even more so that the “Warmists” will NEVER get it. They live to die for AGW. Not rational.
Steve,
See if you can get this raw data. Observations by the same person for 84 years!
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/23/i-wonder-how-this-dedicated-weather-observer-feels-about-having-his-readings-adjusted-by-ncdc/