Shock News Of Conspiratorial Data Tampering

I was listening to a Congressional hearing the other day, which had whistle blowers from the VA reporting on how management was tampering with the VA performance data for political purposes.

I simply don’t find it credible that US government employees would conspire to alter data for political purposes.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Shock News Of Conspiratorial Data Tampering

  1. _Jim says:

    I simply don’t find it credible that US government employees would conspire to alter data for political purposes.

    Nor would they do it for money, or love.

    .

    /BIG sarc don’t ya know …

  2. B says:

    And they never faked the data that said people were obeying the 55mph NMSL either…. 😉

  3. Shazaam says:

    And given the fine example set by the laughingstock-in-chief, one would expect government employees to follow his example.

    {wishes it qualified for a sarc tag}

  4. inMAGICn says:

    Did you know that it is rumored that the US government spies on its own citizens?

    Obviously a canard and a lie.

  5. bkivey says:

    “I simply don’t find it credible that US government employees would conspire to alter data for political purposes.”

    “. . . driven, patriotic, idealistic Americans to public service that our citizens deserve and that our system of self-government demands.”

    Barack Obama 1 October 2013

    Dear Leader has said it, I believe it: that ends it.

  6. philjourdan says:

    Colorado Wellington would be proud of your sarcasm! Nicely done.

  7. David A says:

    “I simply don’t find it credible that US government employees would conspire to alter data for political purposes.”
    =========================
    Of course. Human nature stops at capitalist and conservatives. Liberals are generous and not interested in money or power.

  8. Jason Calley says:

    Alter the numbers?! Of course not. That is why we can believe the CPI figures and the low unemployment numbers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *