You really can’t make this stuff up.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Game Over For The Climate
- Another Ice Age?
- Historic Heatwave
- Historic Heatwave
- Science-Free Journalism
- Why Is Venus So Hot?
- Color Or Monochrome?
- AI Doublespeak
- AI Doublespeak
- Net Zero Intelligence
- “The Green Party dropped nearly 9 per cent”
- Fake Record Heat In India
- RFK Jr’s Plan For $12 Gas
- Hockey Match
- Hockey Match
- Giving Proper Credit
- Conspiracy Theory!
- “No One Is Above The Law”
- CNN Experts Discuss Medicine
- Looking For Their Lost Keys
- Rapid Climate Change
- CBS News 1982 : One Fourth Of Florida To Drown
- Affordable Transportation
- “Why Scientific Fraud Is Suddenly Everywhere”
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Bob G on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Jack the Insider on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Conrad Ziefle on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- arn on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Bill on Historic Heatwave
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Bill on Another Ice Age?
Maybe “Interesting Facts” thinks that “silent” means “didn’t comment on WUWT”? (not sure whether or not you have; after AW’s foot-in-mouth episode, I’m less inclined to visit there now)
Why is it that almost all sites (or profiles) that have “facts” in their name often have their “facts” wrong?
Couldn’t be some ‘grand charade’ on their part could it? If they were honest, then ‘Progressive’ or “Liberal” would appear in their titles, along the lines of something like this:
“The Progressive Committee in search of non-Conforming Thought and Heresy”
or
“The Liberal Gate Keepers of Illogic and All Nonsense”
.
I think the problem was less “steve”‘s phrasing and more Anthony’s myopic one issue reading.
However once assured that there was an issue regarding the stations he did become mildly interested, and indicated weakly that Our host might have a point or two .
The equivocating, weaseling, and toeing of the line, I could probably do without. ( and have been)
Steve’s wording always seems pretty straight forward and hard to misinterpret. Some folks just have a hard time reading. They have a preconceived idea about what Steve is going to say and end up not reading the words in there correct order.
Isn’t it great that there’s now so few people post non-science on global warming, that we are having to pick holes in what other skeptics do!
I suppose, I would rather read two skeptics arguing than two consensual agreeing.
This consensual thing gets even more complicated by the required affirmative consent at American colleges. The participants have to get it before they reach any deeper agreement …
http://www.mindingthecampus.com/2014/06/california_affirmative_consent
Notice how all the warmers are picking out the minor side issues and totally avoiding the actual PROBLEM.
Government Agencies caught with their pants down over-adjusting the Temperature Records.
All the Latest Climate Analysis using that data is corrupted and pretty worthless unless it shows the PAUSE, because it is not a pause at all it is cooling.
Thta includes the latest IPCC Reports.
So that’s what it feels like when Toto tries to nip at your heels.
How cute! He’s trying so hard!