You really can’t make this stuff up.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- dm on Extreme Weather
- Mike on 70C At Lisbon
- Mike on Extreme Weather
- conrad ziefle on Extreme Weather
- Luigi on 70C At Lisbon
- Luigi on 70C At Lisbon
- Bob G on Extreme Weather
- arn on 70C At Lisbon
Maybe “Interesting Facts” thinks that “silent” means “didn’t comment on WUWT”? (not sure whether or not you have; after AW’s foot-in-mouth episode, I’m less inclined to visit there now)
Why is it that almost all sites (or profiles) that have “facts” in their name often have their “facts” wrong?
Couldn’t be some ‘grand charade’ on their part could it? If they were honest, then ‘Progressive’ or “Liberal” would appear in their titles, along the lines of something like this:
“The Progressive Committee in search of non-Conforming Thought and Heresy”
or
“The Liberal Gate Keepers of Illogic and All Nonsense”
.
I think the problem was less “steve”‘s phrasing and more Anthony’s myopic one issue reading.
However once assured that there was an issue regarding the stations he did become mildly interested, and indicated weakly that Our host might have a point or two .
The equivocating, weaseling, and toeing of the line, I could probably do without. ( and have been)
Steve’s wording always seems pretty straight forward and hard to misinterpret. Some folks just have a hard time reading. They have a preconceived idea about what Steve is going to say and end up not reading the words in there correct order.
Isn’t it great that there’s now so few people post non-science on global warming, that we are having to pick holes in what other skeptics do!
I suppose, I would rather read two skeptics arguing than two consensual agreeing.
This consensual thing gets even more complicated by the required affirmative consent at American colleges. The participants have to get it before they reach any deeper agreement …
http://www.mindingthecampus.com/2014/06/california_affirmative_consent
Notice how all the warmers are picking out the minor side issues and totally avoiding the actual PROBLEM.
Government Agencies caught with their pants down over-adjusting the Temperature Records.
All the Latest Climate Analysis using that data is corrupted and pretty worthless unless it shows the PAUSE, because it is not a pause at all it is cooling.
Thta includes the latest IPCC Reports.
So that’s what it feels like when Toto tries to nip at your heels.
How cute! He’s trying so hard!