You really can’t make this stuff up.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
- Imaginary Cold And Snow
Recent Comments
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- arn on “Siberia might stay livable”
Maybe “Interesting Facts” thinks that “silent” means “didn’t comment on WUWT”? (not sure whether or not you have; after AW’s foot-in-mouth episode, I’m less inclined to visit there now)
Why is it that almost all sites (or profiles) that have “facts” in their name often have their “facts” wrong?
Couldn’t be some ‘grand charade’ on their part could it? If they were honest, then ‘Progressive’ or “Liberal” would appear in their titles, along the lines of something like this:
“The Progressive Committee in search of non-Conforming Thought and Heresy”
or
“The Liberal Gate Keepers of Illogic and All Nonsense”
.
I think the problem was less “steve”‘s phrasing and more Anthony’s myopic one issue reading.
However once assured that there was an issue regarding the stations he did become mildly interested, and indicated weakly that Our host might have a point or two .
The equivocating, weaseling, and toeing of the line, I could probably do without. ( and have been)
Steve’s wording always seems pretty straight forward and hard to misinterpret. Some folks just have a hard time reading. They have a preconceived idea about what Steve is going to say and end up not reading the words in there correct order.
Isn’t it great that there’s now so few people post non-science on global warming, that we are having to pick holes in what other skeptics do!
I suppose, I would rather read two skeptics arguing than two consensual agreeing.
This consensual thing gets even more complicated by the required affirmative consent at American colleges. The participants have to get it before they reach any deeper agreement …
http://www.mindingthecampus.com/2014/06/california_affirmative_consent
Notice how all the warmers are picking out the minor side issues and totally avoiding the actual PROBLEM.
Government Agencies caught with their pants down over-adjusting the Temperature Records.
All the Latest Climate Analysis using that data is corrupted and pretty worthless unless it shows the PAUSE, because it is not a pause at all it is cooling.
Thta includes the latest IPCC Reports.
So that’s what it feels like when Toto tries to nip at your heels.
How cute! He’s trying so hard!