I put on a suit, but continued to misbehave by talking about the peer-review debunked 1970’s ice age scare.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- France And England To Defeat Russia
- COP29 Update
- Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 yearsβ
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earthβs hottest weather in 120,000 years”
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on COP29 Update
- Jack the Insider on COP29 Update
- Bill on HUD Climate Advisor
- arn on France And England To Defeat Russia
- Nicholas McGinley on COP29 Update
- Greg in NZ on COP29 Update
- conrad ziefle on France And England To Defeat Russia
- conrad ziefle on “Gender-responsive climate action”
- conrad ziefle on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- Timo, not that one! on “Gender-responsive climate action”
Rock on. Love it.
+1, when we’ll see you on YT Steve?
I thought you should have flipped the mic over the other side of the podium and had your back to the audience so you could read your slides and be heard at the same time, hands free or cordless mics would have worked better than those fixed mics. Everything could be heard after the first minute. Went pretty well, hope you are making the rounds and having some fun.
Like Jim Morrison!!
Welcome to the light.
I had other duties this afternoon, but maybe we can say hello to each other tomorrow.
Actually Tony has always been in the light. It is others that are now joining him …
I think he means spotlight. Now the petrodollars will start flowing in. Check your bank account.
Sounds good Anthony. I will see you this morning.
That is more often than you will see me in a suit! π
I rather be in a ‘suit’ (Blazer and slacks) than in a dress and stockings and heels. Last time was Hubby’s 50th High School Reunion…
Do you need heels? I picture you taller, domineering even, and not needing heels. I must be remembering some teacher from grade school or something …
How did such an old man marry a 29 year old?
… I’ll bet it had something to do with a razor sharp intellect and an equally ‘cutting’ wit …
The “Physics” of the situation, eh?
I was wondering that myself. π
Well, so would I! π
This is good. I worried that if we ever see Steve in a suit he’d be saying:
“Not guilty, Your Honor.”
Well, first, there is ‘the arraignment’ or more commonly called the ‘bail hearing’ …
So you got the picture of the last time I wore a suit, eh? π
Nothing more attractive than a “Climate Rebel”, in a suit! Fear mongers….eat your hearts out!
You can take the boy out from the country ——– !
Looks like the presentation are now on line for later viewing (as I’m doing now)!
Go here:
http://climateconference.heartland.org/breakout-3-streaming/
Click on:
. . . Breakout Room #3 (62:38)
Note: Be sure to choose the one with length “62:38”
.
Maybe I wasn’t clear (I often write in code, in an obfuscating manner, and usually without clarity) – Steve’s (Tony Heller’s) presentation begins about 5 (five) minutes in at the link I posted just above – just select the video from the column on the right as described above that shows:
. . . “Breakout Room #3 (62:38)“.
Good presentation, Steve (Tony).
.
I’m glad I wasn’t there because I would have started an argument with Watts about a couple of things in the middle of the floor
Some did.
It’s a good thing you are doing.
Marc Morano gave a stem-winder of a talk too!
I can’t even look at his blog anymore – stories about the creeping climate kooks crawling around out there just gives me a headache
I can’t comment as I have never been to Climate Depot; I tend to visit the ‘primary’ science blogs on this issue rather than the ‘press’ blogs such as his, but also recall, he has a different ‘target’ audience than you or I …
Visit it if you want to see some stories about some sick people. And I mean SICK
Co2 has sure had an influence on something, it has made some people sick beyond anything any cult has ever managed before
Thanks, Brian, I think I’ll pass. I worked at a State Hospital as an AV technician to put my self thru school, and I thought the staff was as ‘messed up’ as the ‘residents’ in some cases so I have had my ‘fill’ of sick people. I have also done some reading and research on psychopaths and where they show up in politics and business, and I think I have worked for a few such ppl (and maybe even dated a couple) so I think I will take a pass on this offer …
But, You DO want to look. Because we all need to know what we’re dealing with. The real face of this cult is the heart of evil. The sooner everyone realizes this the sooner we can mobilize efforts to stop them. As long as people think eco-nazis are about the environment, they have cover from culpability.
Evil? Or sick? Sick means, no control over it. Evil means, choice. But they do have control over it, and they feign sickness to please somebody else.
Nobody on Earth can question why the Holocaust was the Holocaust. People can legitimately question, why no one learned anything
re: Send Al to the Pole July 9, 2014 at 4:09 am
Geez. Been there, done that. Want to see a picture of the T shirt? Don’t make me go all whoop-az on ya … I don’t need any more friggin experience recognizing and dealing with miscreants, malcontents, ne’er do wells, or “kids, lids and space cadets” for that matter. Matter of fact, I’m a little more used to taking on a ‘whole board’ versus just sniper action … <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1270832/posts?q=1&;page=1"(sample) …
Some of us have been on the ‘net for 20 years now, and mixing it up pretty good for many of those years.
.
I’m thinking now that both you guys need to head back to the minors … JMO now you understand.
F#ck that. I would bet there would be a tenth as many global warming parasite imbecile Communist uneducated leech imbecile global warmers w/o Internet
Good question by audience member at 51:52 and answer by Tony at 52:10 about adjustments and answering to critics on this subject.
The “big blow up” from a few weeks ago mentioned at the 53:04 point.
Tony at the 55:38 point reiterates that ‘an awareness of history’ and simple statistics is important … Barack Obama 4 hurricanes (so far) versus Grover Cleveland (~1880’s) 26 hurricanes …
Russel Cook also had a good presentation … thanks Russel.
Morano hit the nail on the head re: cost/benefit analysis. No government has ever produced one, yet we’re supposed to submit to their taxes and trading schemes? If they were corporations, the pitch wouldn’t last a microsecond.
Yes he did.
Steve Schneider was a leftist darling as a global freezer. Resurrected six years later as a global warming darling. What did he have that I lack.
Schneider never made a correct call in his LIFE! He passed away, still calling people “deniers.” Denying what, I wonder.
Go Tony! Great job!
Is there a web link to the speeches? I’d like to see some of this.
http://climateconference.heartland.org/
Nope. No one saw fit to post any links. None at all.
/s
(And you’re in the ‘eye’ business?)
Is that you Steven/Tony or a cartoon rendition of yours π
Steven and Toto:
https://tallbloke.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/letour.jpg
Great job. Where did you park the bike ?
The news is out. It has nothing to do with science. It’s all about rewriting history. But than those in power always do . You can’t do science with the wrong data and changing the boiling point of water. Burning the books (past) by Hitler was done for the same reason.Of course controlling the next generation’s education is doing the same job.
A serious request
Tony,
I would love to have a copy of your power point that you used. I would love to have a speech to go with it — the one you would have given if time permitted. I think this speech you gave was great, but I know that given time you could do even better.
This would be a great resource to use to show youngsters how government funded “scientists” can’t always be trusted.
After all your work that I have read over a long time, I realize that one long presentation of the evidence as you were doing when time ran out on you is one of the most valuable indictments of modern “science” that I have seen in half a century. I hope you expand on it.
NOTE: For some reason I had pictured you as a much younger man. I guess it was all the notes about bicycling to work and hiking and so forth. (of course, at my age you still are a “younger man”)
Public speaking is the most difficult skill to acquire and requires a lot of training and practice.
Steven, you did OK.
Can’t dress you up indeed: Talking up peer review (even from the 1970s) is like Granny on the Beverly Hillbillies talking up ‘possum bellies and turnip greens (sorry turnips, you’ve been put through a lot here), or her homemade roomy-tiz medicine. Peer review got climate science into the current mess.
Also without clothes he was still the king. It are not the clothes that make a person.
My almost freezing to death in 1970 never happened!
Tony,
You rocked the casbah and look great in a suit.
Heck, I even wore a panama hat just in case I ran into Briggs, (I did! What a character…).
Strong points: You naturally speak slowly and carefully, and proceed logically from point to point. In your presentation, you alternated between data with graphs (concepts and visuals) with parallel historic articles (stories / historic record). Very powerful.
Weak points: You’re shooting fish in a barrel. Just kidding! Actually it’s more like you are shooting zombies at point-blank range with a sawed-off shotgun.