Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- El Nino To The Rescue
- Bullseye!
- It’s Getting Closer
- Greenland Meltdown Scam
- Greenland Ice Update
- Wyoming Gold
- Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Earth, Wind And Fire
- On The Road Again
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
Recent Comments
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- Terry Shipman on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- Jack the Insider on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- conrad ziefle on El Nino To The Rescue
- conrad ziefle on El Nino To The Rescue
- arn on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
Guess it was the warming oceans!
Now that was a perfect storm of circumstances.
It’s a good thing that Gen. Henry Robert protected Galveston from future disasters by curbing their CO2-producing fossil fuel and cement use… or something.
Reblogged this on the WeatherAction Blog.
The rebuilding of Galveston is a fascinating story http://www.texasalmanac.com/topics/history/galvestons-response-hurricane-1900. Following this devastating storm the ground level of the city was built up by as much as 16′ of sand and a sea wall constructed.
No attempt was made to blame this disaster on trace amounts of a life giving gas.
John Houghton’s scam book “Global Warming a Complete Briefing” has a chart that gauges hurricanes on damage in dollars, and he doesn’t adjust for inflation. He rates the Galveston storm as minor, of course. I’m sure it would be major if he did adjust for inflation, but that would go against The Cause.
People need to gauge hurricanes on wind speed, pressure, storm surge, etc. to be relevant to global warming. Number of people killed and damage to human property is not how you measure a hurricane.
+1
But that doesn’t make big scary news stories that can be used to scare people into going in the direction the politicians (and their puppet masters) want.
The lying never stops for warmists.
http://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2014/09/Warming-consensus-and-it-critics.pdf
“Number of people killed and damage to human property is not how you measure a hurricane.” And has nothing to do with scientific measurement.
Exactly. Somehow the climate astrologers don’t figure in the fact that there’s more people in the way and things cost more.
The book, “Issac’s Storm”, gave a very good description of the intensity of the storm. I remember the snakes hung up in fences afterward and they bit people in the water during the surge.