Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
- Protecting Endangered Species
- Record Climate Cynicism
- Record Cynicism
- The Latest In Climate Science Rhetoric
- Climate Desperation
- Artificial Stupidity
- Climate Obsession
- The Climate Empire Strikes Back
- Climate Scam Parrots
- “I’ve dealt with him before ”
- “I’ve dealt with him before.”
Recent Comments
- Bill on What’s At Stake?
- arn on “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- Conrad Ziefle on “Climate change is a myth”
- Conrad Ziefle on Too Hot To Live
- Conrad Ziefle on What’s At Stake?
- Conrad Ziefle on “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- Francis Barnett on “Climate change is a myth”
- Gordon Vigurs on What’s At Stake?
- Paul Marks on What’s At Stake?
- Disillusioned on What’s At Stake?
In 1931, Meteorologists Were Certain About The Relationship Between Solar Activity And Weather
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Thanks to guys like SG we have AT LAST got a result!!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2813394/Heat-Weather-Bureau-MP-accuses-wiping-118-year-old-temperature-records-justify-claims-climate-change.html ther is a video
You will see the BOM staff now scatter in all directions. Fortunately the whistleblowers will reveal the 2 or 3 persons involved and hopefully they will be retired quick smart from the bureau. This should be a warning to NOAA and NASA staff involved in the scam. Its time The US senate or Congress launcehd a full scale investigation in data fudging there as well
Yes it is time for a Congressional investigation into the reason for government deception after WWII about the source of energy (E) stored as mass (m) in cores of:
1. Heavy atoms like Uranium
2. Some planets like Jupiter
3. Ordinary stars like the Sun
4. Galaxies like the Milky Way
Today’s false AGW (anthropologic global warming) tale is a direct result of the false SSM (Standard Solar Model of hydrogen-filled stars) tale of 1946:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/WHY.pdf
Science became a tool of government propaganda after unreported CHAOS and FEAR of nuclear annihilation in AUG-SEPT 1945 convinced world leaders to form the UN in OCT 1945 and save the world by forbidding public knowledge of the energy in cores of heavy atoms, stars and galaxies.
The Standard Solar Model of H-filled stars did not explain solar sunspots nor cycles of solar activity.
Climategate emails that surfaced five years ago in 2009 awakened us to the validity of the warning that George Orwell started writing in 1946 , “Nineteen Eighty-Four”
Now we realize that AGW is as real as the Standard Solar Model, Big Bang, Oscillating Solar Neutrinos, the Higgs Boson, Black Holes, Dark Energy, Dark Matter, etc., ad infinitum.
http://suyts.wordpress.com/2014/10/27/timely-pope-no-big-bang-without-god/#comment-151006
Yes, and talk about regression!
My grandpa, Edison Pettit, along with Dr. Hubble, worked on the sun spot/hotter temps problem from 1899 to 1940. I have been furious about this being tossed out today especially by NASA. Disgusting.
The link between Earth’s weather and sunspots was well know before WWII but it could not be explained by the post-WWII Standard Solar Model of hydrogen-filled stars.
Professors Ninham, Friberg and I tried to explain in 2002 that the false AGW theory is a direct result of the false Standard Solar Model.
I will post a link below.
“Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate”,
Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002). http://www.springerlink.com/content/r2352635vv166363/
Are you suggesting that the Sun’s interior is cold enough to have superfluidity or supercondcutivity in it?
No, the interior of the Sun is not cold.
The paper cites the 1963 suggestion by Professor Barry Ninham of condensation of iron-rich supernova debris into a superconductor in 1963.
Thanks for the reply, I don’t have access to the paper today but the abstract says
“Bose-Einstein condensation [2] of iron-rich, zero-spin material into a rotating, superfluid, superconductor surrounding the solar core”
indicating that an iron rich material, with zero spin, could become a “Bose-Einstein condensate” at the solar core, despite the large T.
Even with the high pressures of the solar core, or perhaps because of them, the quantum energy spectrum would probably collapse and the typical gap of superconductivity would not be possible.
Does this condensation, suggested by Prof. Barry Ninham, involve some new approach to superconductivity, I mean different from the usual BCS theory?
It’s funny now to see how quaint the were with their naive beliefs. The very idea that the sun has anything to do with temperatures on Earth. It is to laugh.
This correcting solar records business gives me a headache, because it’s a complex trail spanning hundreds of years, I won’t mention names, tho originally I had no issue with it, but the more I look into it and listen to other peoples arguments on the subject I’m beginning to suspect there is funny goings on in relation to the global warming scam.. After all if it looks like a turnip and tastes like a turnip chances are, it is a turnip!
And besides.. we’ve all seen this wacky bunch of climastrologists come up with far worse ideas when they begin to rub shoulders together with other disciplines.
Hardly news (unless we’re discussing Climate McScientists).
Sir William Herschel, Variable Stars, Sunspots and the Price of Wheat
http://simostronomy.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/sir-william-herschel-variable-stars.html
Even the Ancient Egyptians were aware of the relationship between solar activity and the level of the Nile.
Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
My how things change and not always for the better — they were more right in 1931 then they are today!
Can’t blame them for being incomplete in their knowledge. They needed the bloated, award winning, sexually
pervertedmaladjusted Al Gore to explain that it is CO2 from fossil fuel that was one in the atmosphere that caused the weather.Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog and commented:
Funny if it weren’t true.