Climate scientists have no training in signal processing, and have absolutely no business being in control of the temperature record.
Analyzing the temperature record has nothing to do with any skills related to atmospheric physics, and climate science peer-review is meaningless as a result.
Confirmation bias is not science. Being coach, referee, cheerleader, scorekeeper, publicist and both teams – is not acceptable in any environment.
Being coach, referee, cheerleader, scorekeeper, publicist and both teams – is not acceptable in any environment.
Nor is being Tonya Harding, Jeff Gillooly, Shawn Eckhardt, or Shane Stant.
Little League.
http://espn.go.com/sports/soccer/story/_/id/7927946/soccer-wilson-raj-perumal-world-most-prolific-criminal-match-fixer-espn-magazine
And the current crowd of luke warmer glee club members are no better than the climate scientists.
Outsiders are very dangerous. Not only do they see things differently, they have no career to protect or advance. Science protects itself by destroying the careers of people who get out of line and challenge the social and political order of a particular discipline. By using degrees and monolithic training few will even see things differently in the first place. When challenged by outsiders authority will be invoked. An engineer who has to be able to handle data properly to make a successful design will not be welcome in the climate science world.
+1
Being coach, referee, cheerleader, scorekeeper, publicist and both teams – is not acceptable in any environment.
Only in Government.
Many people in government are addicted to power. They MUST have control over everything, and everyone. It is irrational, but they suffer from an irrational desire. Wealth? Security? Admiration? Some of them have all those things — but that is not enough. Power, control, authority — those are what they seek.
Jeezo Pete… I think I would rather have a drug addiction than to have THAT particular monkey riding my back. There is no methadone for those people.
Of course the worst are those who are not only power addicts, but psychopaths as well.
And in Academia.
“Climate scientists have no training in signal processing, and have absolutely no business being in control of the temperature record.”
They also have little to no training in statistical methods and thus should not be engaged in an activity that is mainly statistics.
Now we have Gavin who is a Mathematician and therefore twice as dangerous as Hansen
“Climate scientists have no training in signal processing, and have absolutely no business being in control of the temperature record.”
I have reached very much the same conclusion. I look at the ice-age cycle and because I’ve worked with signals all my life, I see so much meaning in the signals such as the fact that inter-glacials must have moderate to strong negative feedbacks against further warming.
And if anyone is interested I’m running a series on http://scottishsceptic.co.uk.
“They also have little to no training in statistical methods and thus should not be engaged in an activity that is mainly statistics.”
Some may be trainable though. I understand that Phil Jones is finally learning how to do an Excel spreadsheet.