Gavin Goes For Two In One Day

Posted on February 20, 2015 by Tony Heller

ScreenHunter_1107 Feb. 19 19.08ScreenHunter_1108 Feb. 19 19.08  ScreenHunter_1109 Feb. 19 19.10

Actual scientists call it the “jet stream” – rather than “extreme”

screenhunter_224-jan-21-20-19

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to Gavin Goes For Two In One Day

  1. Donna K. Becker says:
    February 20, 2015 at 12:15 am

    There was a record high temp in Alaska earlier this week. Sure enough, it’s getting colder here in Central Oregon. There’s even snow in the forecast toward the end of next week. You’d think Gavin would be aware of such patterns.

    Reply
  2. daveandrews723 says:
    February 20, 2015 at 12:20 am

    Usually in the past we have called this “weather,” you know, extremes that happen all the time and over a period of time even each other out. Now there has to be some overarching explanation that only NOAA/NCDC experts can explain or understand. And of course, whatever the case, they will blame it on man and CO2. Better to rally the troops and keep the funding alive.

    Reply
  3. sabretoothed says:
    February 20, 2015 at 12:21 am

    Was the record high adjusted ? 😛

    Reply
  4. Morgan Wright says:
    February 20, 2015 at 12:29 am

    He knows he’s full of shit. You tell a liar he’s lying and he just shrugs his shoulders.

    Reply
    • Treb Hawkins says:
      February 20, 2015 at 12:49 am

      Of course after the shoulder shrug on must adhere to:

      “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
      ~ Joseph Goebbels

      Reply
    • Edmonton Al says:
      February 20, 2015 at 12:49 am

      Abso-effin’-lutely right. [pardon my French]

      Reply
  5. emsnews says:
    February 20, 2015 at 12:53 am

    Gavin is about my age so he has zero excuse about remembering the 1970’s. What a dodo.

    Reply
  6. Joseph says:
    February 20, 2015 at 1:02 am

    Does Gavin ever respond to you?

    Reply
  7. ACR says:
    February 20, 2015 at 1:02 am

    OT: Lake Huron is totally iced over.

    Canadian Ice Service

    Reply
  9. Bart says:
    February 20, 2015 at 1:52 am

    Booyah! Nice.

    Reply
  10. tallbloke says:
    February 20, 2015 at 9:08 am

    Reblogged this on Tallbloke's Talkshop and commented:
    .
    .
    Catastrophist Gavin Schmidt spreads more Climate FUD. Why is this man in charge of a supposedly neutral scientific institution at NASA GISS?

    Reply
  11. gator69 says:
    February 20, 2015 at 11:58 am

    This is why they refuse to debate, they have no facts to back their claims.

    Reply
  12. kirkmyers says:
    February 20, 2015 at 12:02 pm

    One of the first actions of a Republican president should be a house-cleaning at NASA GISS and NOAA NCDC. Schmidt and other AGW ringleaders need to be given their walking papers, and a full-scale fraud investigation needs to be launched. Some of these scientists-turned-con artists need to go to jail.

    We also should cut off all research funding to any publicly funded college or unversity actively promoting the global warming fraud. Michael Mann and other “climate change” cranks would soon be out the door.

    Reply
    • Gail Combs says:
      February 20, 2015 at 12:46 pm

      We need to cut off ALL federal government funding to education PERIOD. Where in the Constitution does it say the FEDERAL government should stick their nose into education?

      There is a darn good reason the federal government was given very limited powers and the states given more. The closer to home the power the better the control by citizens.

      That is why the EU was created and why the global elite want a UN modeled after the EU. Remove the power as far as possible from the people and you turn them into little more than slaves.

      Reply
    • Disillusioned says:
      February 20, 2015 at 1:00 pm

      Kirk, I’m afraid what “should” occur, won’t.

      Reply
      • Gail Combs says:
        February 20, 2015 at 2:25 pm

        The ReBooblicans and the DemiRats sing from the same hymnal. That is why BOTH parties worked so hard to kill off the Tea Party. The Tea Party when first formed had split voters into 1/3 vs 1/3 vs 1/3 and the Political Class could not stand for that.

        Rasmussen Reports:
        Monday, April 20, 2009

        51% View Tea Parties Favorably, Political Class Strongly Disagrees
        Fifty-one percent (51%) of Americans have a favorable view of the “tea parties” held nationwide last week, including 32% who say their view of the events is Very favorable.

        Survey of 1,000 Adults April 16-17, 2009
        Do you have a very favorable, somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable or very unfavorable impression of the tea party protests?

        Very favorable ……………. 32%

        Somewhat favorable …… 19%

        Somewhat unfavorable …. 15%

        Very unfavorable ………….. 18%

        Not sure …………………….. 15%

        That explains why we all of a sudden had Occupy Wall Street movement spring up. But these professional protesters and partying college students had no idea of what they were actually protesting unlike the Tea Party members. Even the ‘Clinton School of Public Service, University of Arkansas’ admitted “This mass turnout among Tea Party members may account for the substantial media coverage that this relatively small movement has experienced. A second contributing factor may be the political knowledge demonstrated by Tea Party supporters. When asked a battery of “political sophistication” questions—factual questions about the contemporary government—Tea Party members outperformed Non-Tea Party members repeatedly. Specifically, Tea Party members were more likely to correctly identify the jobs held by Attorney General Eric Holder, Chief Justice John Roberts, and Vice President Joe Biden (Table 1).”

        Notice the lie that the tea part was a relatively small movement. If it was small the Political Class would have ignored it instead of attacking. I think the Tea Party scared the stuffing out of the Political Class.

        Tuesday, October 29, 2013

        42% Identify with Obama Politically, 42% with the Tea Party
        A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 42% of Likely U.S. Voters think the president’s views are closest to their own when it comes to the major issues facing the country. But just as many (42%) say their views come closest to those of the average Tea Party member instead. Sixteen percent (16%) are not sure.

        An excellent analysis of why the is no difference between the two parties: America’s Ruling Class

        Reply
        • DD More says:
          February 20, 2015 at 7:03 pm

          They need to remember the 2nd Tea Party, the Republican Party of 1854. Parties the same, nothing changes.

          American major parties develop their own distinctive auras that are no less real for being intangible and unmeasurable. Whig and Democratic leaders were strikingly similar in such significant characteristics as wealth, occupational prestige, a fundamentally conservative social ideology, materialism, and opportunism. These similarities help explain why both major parties were attractive to moneyed men. But it is unwise to discount the significance of the unique blending of moral values and social philosophies that some imaginative historians have recently discerned in Whig leaders, a blending that helps account for the Whigs’ special appeal to one rather than another kind of individual.

          Ultimately, however, the Whigs are best understood as an American major party trying to be many things to many men, ready to abandon one deeply held ‘conviction’ for another in the drive for political power. The party died not because its unique aura no longer appealed to voters but because it could not cope effectively or persuasively with what after the Compromise of 1850 became the great issue of American politics, the expansion of slavery.

          The Reader’s Companion to American History. Eric Foner and John A. Garraty, Editors. Copyright © 1991 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.

          What is the Compromise of 2015.

        • Gail Combs says:
          February 20, 2015 at 7:23 pm

          “What is the Compromise of 2015.”

          I would say there were two.

          The first was the banker bailout as the America’s Ruling Class article stated, this was NOT supported by either the democrat or republican voters. The second was the ratification of the World Trade Oranization that transfered US technology and jobs overseas leading to the major unemployment problem. Again this was NOT supported by either the democrat or republican voters.

          On the left: Occupy Wall Street: The Most Important Thing in the World Now Naomi Klein

          …Many people have drawn parallels between Occupy Wall Street and the so-called anti-globalization protests that came to world attention in Seattle in 1999. That was the last time a global, youth-led, decentralized movement took direct aim at corporate power. And I am proud to have been part of what we called “the movement of movements.”

          ….. we chose summits as our targets: the World Trade Organization, the International Monetary Fund, the G8…..

          She of course tries to deflect the energy of the group onto Climate Change and away from the original targets.

          Far on the other side you have 35 Facts About The Gutting Of America’s Industrial Might That Should Make You Very Angry which again focuses on Unemployment, the Banksters, the Housing Crash, and Government Debt…..

          A party that picks as a focus Unemployment, the Banksters, the Housing Crash, and the WTO would easily pick up many many votes and that is why America’s Ruling class STOMPED HARD on the Tea Party.

  13. John Goetz says:
    February 20, 2015 at 6:35 pm

    I’ve had my alarmist friends sending me this drivel the past couple of days as if the change to the jet stream this winter is something new:

    https://theconversation.com/a-melting-arctic-and-weird-weather-the-plot-thickens-37314

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *