Nearly identical weather as February, 1934 tells thief, liar, fraudster and likely forger Peter Gleick that “we broke the weather.”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
Recent Comments
- arn on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- BenV on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- arn on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Greg in NZ on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- czechlist on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Disillusioned on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- arn on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- conrad ziefle on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- arn on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Billyjack on COP29 Preview
But Gleick would never do anything dishonest!
As I recall, Peter Gleick was in charge of ethics for the AGU – an organization established by the US NAS to advance the goals of its Geophysics Section.
At the 1956 AGU national meeting in Washington, DC, Paul K. Kuroda first reported his prediction that natural nuclear reactors had burned on Earth about two billion years ago.
At the 1976 AGU national meeting in Washington, DC, Dwarka D. Sabu and I first reported that the Sun itself made our chemical elements and birthed the solar system.
Although both papers were confirmed by later measurements, both papers were ambushed by NAS members in the AGU meetings and dismissed as technically impossible.
Peter Gleick is well qualified to speak as an advocate for AGW.
As Gail Combs reports below, the press is beginning to realize the danger of having politicians and puppet “scientists” as bedfellows.
This strange relationship allowed the US National Academy of Sciences to direct public tax funds to finance the following lies as scientific facts:
1. Conflict of science with religion
2. The Standard Climate Models
3. The Standard Nuclear Model
4. The Standard Solar Model
5. Big Bang Cosmology Model
All of the above consensus science falsehoods are designed to hide our total dependence on the Sun’s pulsar core that first made and now sustains each atom, life and world in the solar system and the changing climate on each planet orbiting the Sun.
After confronting NAS members at the Spring AGU meeting in April 1976,
I was invited to chair the section on xenon isotopic anomalies at the 1976 summer Gregynog Workshop on Isotopic Anomalies.
This picture shows me sitting directly behind Willie Fowler at the workshop:
http://www.omatumr.com/Photographs/Photo1976GregynogWorkshop.pdf
On the ride from Cardiff to Gregynog, Willie Fowler tried to persuade me it was okay for NAS to review budgets of research agencies for Congress; that the practice was not in conflict with the basic principles of science, as I had already suggested in letters to Congress after the Spring 1976 AGU disaster.
Willie Fowler later became President of NAS and then won the 1982 Nobel Prize in physics for promoting the false Standard Solar Model that Fred Hoyle actually developed in 1946.
In his 1994 autobiography, “Home Is Where the Wind. Blows,” Fred Hoyle explains how the Sun’s internal composition was abruptly changed from:
1. Mostly iron (Fe) in 1945 to
2. Mostly hydrogen (H) in 1946
Thus ended the scientific revolution that Copernicus started in 1543!
Gleick, asshole,and in the same ‘innumerate’ category as ‘lame brooks’ in not recognizing repeating weather patterns over periods of a 100 years …
“Gleick Joins In The Stupid”
Gleick joined the stupid (and dishonest) years and years ago. Your report is late.
Did he ever leave The Stupid?
Which isn’t to that he’s not cunning and dishonest.
I thought it was the climate we were worried about.
No Gator, it is corrupt dishonest politicians, bureaucrats and academics we are (or should be) worried about.
The reports of the massive corruption and dishonesty in the US political machine are FINALLY trickling out.
SHIELDING THE GIANT: USDA’s “Don’t Look, Don’t Know” Policy
Research Misconduct Identified by the US Food and Drug Administration — HIDDEN
SAGE Publications busts “peer review and citation ring,” 60 papers retracted
The LA times reports: Cheating students more likely to want government jobs, study finds
Even the Guardian reports: False positives: fraud and misconduct are threatening scientific research
Twenty to thirty years ago you would never have seen information like this.
Thanks Gail for the encouraging news. Politicians and puppet “scientists” should be worried.
Public outrage may be difficult to contain if the public finally realizes that:
1. The conflict of science with religion
2. The Standard Climate Model
3. The Standard Nuclear Model
4. The Standard Solar Model &
5. Big Bang Cosmology
are all falsehoods (government propaganda) designed to hide our total dependence on the Sun’s pulsar core that made and sustains every atom, life and world in the solar system.
Climate’s just the weapon in the hands of the Progressive hoarde. It’s just a tool to bring back “benevolent” oligarchies. The democratic Republics are an anathema to them and they’ve been trying to get rid of them for a couple of centuries.
+10
That is why I think Karl Marx was a weapon groomed for use against the Middle Class. link
Carroll Quigley was Bill Clinton’s mentor
Carroll Quigley in his book “Tragedy and Hope” states:
They almost succeeded this time, before encountering a Power Higher than Stalin!
Big Brother is going down, still unable to comprehend that a Higher Power is in control.
And how about last year?
Gleick was holding it in too long. He had to discharge the pressing thought in full public view.
So the weather is broke, because it has returned to a pattern last seen in the 1930s. I wonder what he would say if it returned to a 1630s pattern?
The current “weather volatility” is mild compared to the volatility of four centuries ago and very mild when compared to reconstructions of the early Holocene. Interglacial periods ARE inherently volatile, especially at the beginning and when approaching their end (soon).
Apparently they are programming people to feel guilty of causing weather to depart slightly from decades of unusually stability, because guilty people are easier to control.
Heck the weather was volatile in the 1960s and 1970s. In New York state we had very cold winters and hot summers (minus 30F to 100 F) and people thought it was just typical weather.
I blame central heating and air combined with the boob tube and video games keeping people inside.
“I blame central heating and air combined with the boob tube and video games keeping people inside.”
Good point. For most people, weather is what they see on TV — even if it is half way around the world or all the way at the South Pole! Of course they cannot instantly visit the other side of the world, so they just assume that what the tube tells them must be the case. If the tube tells them that the world has a fever, well, it must be true!
Note that only 8% of farmers fell for the CAGW crap.
ROTFLMAO
The propagandists think they can bamboozle farmers. Hate to tell them but at this point they distrust in the US government in rural areas is running very very high.
Also many farms have been in the same family for generations and some have kept written records.
1934-7, 1974-8, 2013-? = ~40yr cycle? If so, not out of the recent ordinary.
YES. If one lives indoors, gets one’s info from media, and memory is a history of TV programs, then one has no parameters to reality check weather lies.
Just saying that, considering climate history since the ice age, things could get more volatile by an order of magnitude and still be within the historical “normal”. If they think this is rough, how will they adapt to that?
One speculative possibility: Several astrophysicists think the solar system currently is in a dust cloud or possibly two. If solar activity and solar wind continue to decline, that dust could eventually intrude (due to heliosphere contraction) between the earth and sun. Ice core samples do show accumulations of interstellar dust during glaciation periods. Is this the actual cause of ice ages? Did earth experience a minor occurrence of this in the “dark age”?
If you have not already read Nir Shaviv’s The Milky Way Galaxy’s Spiral Arms and Ice-Age Epochs and the Cosmic Ray Connection, you may find it quite interesting.
A couple more of his articles:
The oceans as a calorimeter
http://www.sciencebits.com/calorimeter
ren will like this one:
http://sciencebits.com/files/pictures/climate/crcFig3.jpg
From: Cosmic Rays and Climate
Those cosmic rays come from the Sun’s pulsar core.