In the 1880’s the US averaged more than two hurricane strikes per year, but now there are less than one per year.. Experts predicted the exact opposite.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Louis Hooffstetter on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Macha on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Gerald Machnee on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Macha on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- JohnFrancis on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- John Francis on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
I dont believe you goddard!!! Just a joke hahahah. When are we going to nail these lying bastards?
Well NOAA’s Hurricane Center showed they can learn. They were embarrassed by way over estimating the storms in 2013 . In 2014 they lowered their “forecast” was down and did a lot better. Still, I think a blind folded Monkey throwing a dart at a dart board would be about as accurate as they are.
Which brings me to a question. Does Weatherbell do a seasonal forecast for Hurricanes?
The only way NOAA has been able to scare people about hurricanes is to change how the count is accomplished. They start by using satellite data to count all hurricanes forming and not those that hit the coast of the US. Then NOAA names storms before they reach hurricane wind speeds. And finally, give every weather event a name no matter where it shows up in the Atlantic.
NOAA continues to reform the way it counts hurricanes/storms to keep the number high and continues to be very fast and loose with the truth.
As usual with these clowns it’s not about the science it’s about scary labels. I’m guessing that by 2016 they’ll be naming and counting tropical invests as “named storms.”
Alarmist: “CAGW means more hurricanes!! I mean fewer hurricanes!! Dammit, I forget; what is it again this week??”
Yes, but clouds with names are on the increase.
I name this cloud OBAMA!
http://worth1000.s3.amazonaws.com/submissions/418000/418390_4dc5_625x1000.jpg
Any time there is a squall in the Atlantic with 30 kt winds, they name is, even with no closed circulation.