Arctic Sea Ice Thickness Is Identical To 75 Years Ago

Arctic sea ice rapidly melted from 1910 to 1940, and was reduced to two meters thick by 1940.

ScreenHunter_107 Feb. 17 07.17

Papers Past — Auckland Star — 14 December 1940 — WARMER ARCTIC

PaintImage47

23 Feb 1940 – THE NORTH POLE. Is it Getting Warmer. | BUNDABER…

The ice is currently two meters thick, identical to 75 years ago.

ictn2015092218_2015093000_041_arcticictn.001

ictn2015092218_2015093000_041_arcticictn.001.gif (740×666)

The glaciers of Norway and Alaska lost half their mass by 1950, and experts warned that we are all going to drown.

PaintImage49

19 Feb 1952 – Melting Ice May Swamp Seaports

President Obama was in Alaska last week and blamed Americans for melting glaciers, a process which has been going on since before America existed.

glacierbaymap (3)

glacierbaymap.gif (420×458)

We have a complete nut job in the White House, who is determined to convince people that he saved the planet. At least 10 Congressional Republicans are supporting his lunacy.

Doesn’t get any crazier than that.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Arctic Sea Ice Thickness Is Identical To 75 Years Ago

  1. !Mark L says:

    The ice sheet in the arctic are as big as they ever were, it’s all a scam for more regulation, and $$$ for the corrupt!

    • Trevor Marr says:

      Why is there only an IPCC? Why is there no IPWorldHealth, or IPWorldHunger, or IPWorldEducation, or IPWorldRefugee, or IPWorldTerrorist? It is a UN/IPCC/Obama scam of World Socialism. It has nothing to do with Climate and EVERYTHING to do with Western Taxation to push Global equality and control.

  2. Andrew says:

    Maybe it is as thick at its center but its area is showing a decline.
    http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

  3. Gary chapman says:

    Great info, looking forward to more

  4. Scott says:

    Was told by our guide in Jasper national park that the glaciers cyclically grow and also digress. She even said that there is no truth to the ice melting crisis, it’s all part of nature.
    I was actually impressed at her hasty and truthfulness.
    I guess this is an inconvenient truth to Al Gore

  5. Scott says:

    Our tour guide in Jasper National Park. Mentioned that the science shows that the glaciers grow and then shrink, this has been proven for years. That there is little to no proof of co2 emissions causing some global warming. She mentioned that climate change is also cyclically provable.
    Not bad for a Canadian Government Employee
    I was impressed with her honest and frank expliation.
    Probably an inconvenient truth for Mr Gore

  6. Weston says:

    Aside from the fact that all the “scientific sources” cited here are from 60+ years ago, where is the data from today to confirm what you are claiming? You posted that lovely map, yet I see no link to the scientific article from which you borrowed it. While I am always open to scientific discussion of any topic, you will never be able to convincingly articulate your point of view if you cannot provide proof of your claim.

    Even though sea ice levels modulate their thickness with the season of the year, you have tactfully neglected to even mention the decline of the EXTENT of sea ice, which the National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC) has kindly compiled from the original source of this data (Kwok 2015), the link to which I have provided below. If you want more people to believe your claims, in the future, please back them up with valid, scientifically acquired data from recent studies, rather than extrapolating your own claims from handpicked excerpts taken out of context from 60+ year old conjecture.

    NSIDC page: http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

    Original article: Kwok, R. 2015. Sea ice convergence along the Arctic coasts of Greenland and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago: Variability and extremes (1992–2014). Geophysical Research Letters, (Accepted) doi:10.1002/2015GL065462.

  7. Stephen R W Cooper says:

    If the global warming “scientists” and politicians had really believed there was a threat they would have gotten out of the way of nuclear power and started promoting it. Imagine if we had started building modern safe nuclear power plants and reprocessing spent fuel to eliminate waste 20 years ago. If we had our CO2 emissions from electric power generation could easily have been halved or even eliminated without stifling our economy. Instead we have pursued expensive non solutions like wind and solar with no significant net reduction in CO2. Instead we have simply exported our jobs and CO2 emissions to places like China. Clearly the people using the global warming issue have no fear of a real problem or they would have behaved differently. Now some of the real global warming scientists have actually advocated going nuclear because they really were afraid. If they turned out to be right we have wasted 20 years and have crippled our economy by driving up the cost of power for nothing.

  8. sychar says:

    around the year 1000 ad, Greenland was sending food grown there, acording to a captain’s log…. though it be comvered by ice now, there is a reason it was named Greenland… check out global warming swindle on youtube. or most video sharing sites.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *