On this date in 1935, Forestburg, South Dakota was 104 degrees, compared to a forecast high of 68 degrees today. One hundred degree days used to be very common there, but they rarely happen anymore. In order to hide this cooling, criminals at NOAA and NASA massively tamper with the temperature data.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Latest Research In Climate Science
- UK Sucking Carbon
- Price-Free Tesla
- Four Years Past The Deadline
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Tel on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Tel on UK Sucking Carbon
- william on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Bob G on UK Net Zero
- arn on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- conrad ziefle on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Ulric Lyons on Erasing 1921
- gordon vigurs on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- gordon vigurs on Plant Food
The 1930’s were truly astounding. How can they possibly claim there is catastrophic warming, when we can’t remotely approach the temperatures from 80 years ago?
I have personally examined in detail the actual temperature records from the 1930’s for many states. It is utterly delusional to claim it is currently as warm or warmer than it was back then.
I was in Rapid City, South Dakota on July 6th, 1973. Officially the temperature hit 110.8 degrees F. Some places around town reported 113 degrees. Whew!
That graph looks a lot like the summer temp series from the CAG page. (hope the link works)
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-series/us/39/0/tavg/3/8/1895-2015?base_prd=true&firstbaseyear=1901&lastbaseyear=2000&filter=true&filterType=binomial
Switching to Tmax really makes it obvious.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-series/us/39/0/tmax/3/8/1895-2015?base_prd=true&firstbaseyear=1901&lastbaseyear=2000&filter=true&filterType=binomial
Checking the adjustments http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/divisional-comparison/ made to the records from SD, even with the cooling of the past, it still shows up.
I have a theory.
CO2 and US Gun ownership show a much higher degree of correlation than does temperature.
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/11/gun-ownership-by-the-numbers-3058416.html
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11638-climate-myths-human-co2-emissions-are-too-tiny-to-matter/
The next step in my research is to determine whether CO2 causes Guns or Guns cause CO2.
We all know that correlation means causation. I know it sounds far fetched, but lets face it, its a better theory than the one Pope Obama and President Francis are proselytising.
🙂
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele,_North_Dakota
And yet, just 79 years later, further north, in North Dakota…….compared with….
http://www.weather.com/weather/monthly/l/58482:4:US
Really? What really is the difference?
74 degrees on that same date in 2015?
This is very torrid………
Arghhhhhhhhhhhhhh! The pain.the pain…….and, at lower carbon footprint…paranoia will get ya!!!!
Correction: 38 degrees difference……it was the Port Wine….forgive me