On this date in 1935, Forestburg, South Dakota was 104 degrees, compared to a forecast high of 68 degrees today. One hundred degree days used to be very common there, but they rarely happen anymore. In order to hide this cooling, criminals at NOAA and NASA massively tamper with the temperature data.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
- Protecting Endangered Species
- Record Climate Cynicism
- Record Cynicism
- The Latest In Climate Science Rhetoric
- Climate Desperation
- Artificial Stupidity
- Climate Obsession
- The Climate Empire Strikes Back
- Climate Scam Parrots
- “I’ve dealt with him before ”
- “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- “BE HONEST”
- Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Net Zero In The UK
- Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
- The World’s Greatest Climate Scientist Speaks Out
- Startling New Revelation
Recent Comments
- arn on Homophobic Gas
- Conrad Ziefle on Homophobic Gas
- Conrad Ziefle on Trained Not To Learn
- Yammobethere on Homophobic Gas
- arn on Homophobic Gas
- Margaret Smith on Homophobic Gas
- maixiu on Homophobic Gas
- Richard E Fritz on Record Cynicism
- Richard E Fritz on Record Climate Cynicism
- Richard E Fritz on World Bank Expectations
The 1930’s were truly astounding. How can they possibly claim there is catastrophic warming, when we can’t remotely approach the temperatures from 80 years ago?
I have personally examined in detail the actual temperature records from the 1930’s for many states. It is utterly delusional to claim it is currently as warm or warmer than it was back then.
I was in Rapid City, South Dakota on July 6th, 1973. Officially the temperature hit 110.8 degrees F. Some places around town reported 113 degrees. Whew!
That graph looks a lot like the summer temp series from the CAG page. (hope the link works)
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-series/us/39/0/tavg/3/8/1895-2015?base_prd=true&firstbaseyear=1901&lastbaseyear=2000&filter=true&filterType=binomial
Switching to Tmax really makes it obvious.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-series/us/39/0/tmax/3/8/1895-2015?base_prd=true&firstbaseyear=1901&lastbaseyear=2000&filter=true&filterType=binomial
Checking the adjustments http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/divisional-comparison/ made to the records from SD, even with the cooling of the past, it still shows up.
I have a theory.
CO2 and US Gun ownership show a much higher degree of correlation than does temperature.
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/11/gun-ownership-by-the-numbers-3058416.html
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11638-climate-myths-human-co2-emissions-are-too-tiny-to-matter/
The next step in my research is to determine whether CO2 causes Guns or Guns cause CO2.
We all know that correlation means causation. I know it sounds far fetched, but lets face it, its a better theory than the one Pope Obama and President Francis are proselytising.
🙂
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele,_North_Dakota
And yet, just 79 years later, further north, in North Dakota…….compared with….
http://www.weather.com/weather/monthly/l/58482:4:US
Really? What really is the difference?
74 degrees on that same date in 2015?
This is very torrid………
Arghhhhhhhhhhhhhh! The pain.the pain…….and, at lower carbon footprint…paranoia will get ya!!!!
Correction: 38 degrees difference……it was the Port Wine….forgive me