In 1934, there was “climate disruption” and drought across the planet.
12 Jun 1934 – WORLD-WIDE DROUGHT.
Instead of blaming humans like the current crop of brainless climate scientists do, scientists at the time blamed variations in solar activity.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Disillusioned on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Disillusioned on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Francis Barnett on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- dm on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- arn on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Tel on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Gamecock on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- conrad ziefle on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- conrad ziefle on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
“Scientist” used to mean what we now call “sceptic” – people who base their views on the evidence. These days Universities are so full of politically correct non-science that you really can’t liken modern “scientists” to the real scientists of old.
‘Solar Variation’ What a Novel idea!! 🙂
Todays ‘scientists’ are the witch doctor, rain dancers of the past. Lull the dim-witted people to sleep with their impressive dance diversions.
I know a few scientific scientist, they are not all one monolithic entity at all.
Actually
this news from that day in 1934 should worry you/all of us:
according to about 6 calculations of mine, using different parameters and [my own] data sets,
we are now in ca.1928…,
with the sun now at its brightest in about 87 years
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/sidc-ssn/from:1972/to:2016/offset:10/trend/plot/sidc-ssn/from:1927/to:2016/plot/sidc-ssn/from:1927/to:1972/trend/plot/sidc-ssn/from:1927/to:2016/trend
that means in ca. 6 years from now the world will be heading for major droughts on all continents, as it was in those days, e.g. the dust bowl drought, 1932-1939
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/div/ocp/drought/dust_storms.shtml
I strongly agree that oceans and the sun are the two forces that influence/make climate, but, on the other hand, I also believe that human activities on the oceans and seas influenced them and, thus, the climate. Here are some studies of what had happened during the naval war and how this one had a big impact over the climate: http://www.2030climate.com/.
Blaming human origin CO2 has ZERO quantitative basis even if CO2 causes some warming.
About 95% 0f the total greenhouse effect is water so this accounts for 0.57 C deg of the total change.
CO2, the other major player, is responsible for the other 0.03 C deg of Dangerous “Warming”.
But, human origin CO2 is only about 4% of all atmospheric CO2 so the human input, if this mechanism was real, is 0.0012 C deg.
We cannot even measure that change in temperature.
http://joannenova.com.au/globalwarming/graphs/log-co2/log-graph-lindzen-choi-web.gif(Data from Lindzen & Choi 2009)
GRRRrr
forgot separate line for image
http://joannenova.com.au/globalwarming/graphs/log-co2/log-graph-lindzen-choi-web.gif
Actually the influence on the ocean is the sun and the moon.
SUN:
http://www.klimaatfraude.info/images/sverdrup.gif
Moon:
So not only is the data minipulated, adjusted, fudged, tortured and rigged beyond recognition by alarmists, the science behind the entire hypothesis is entirely flawed. Yet they have the nerve to threaten to use RICO against the skeptics!
@smamarver
no.
the latest curve of mine shows 100% correlation on a quadratic function for the drop in the speed of warming.(minima)
https://i0.wp.com/oi62.tinypic.com/33kd6k2.jpg
there is no chaos?
ergo
there is no man made warming.
The forces of nature are so strong that they suppress any AGW signal,
so any man made warming is an insignificant number.
I went to post one of my favorite graphs showing the solar spectrum from colorado edu-sorce.
Originally my book mark showed the graph. Then for the last year or so it went to a SORCE page. Now it goes to a different source page and has completely disappeared from the site.
Not only has it disappeared from colorado edu, it has been wiped from much of the Wayback Machine!
The oldest from 2012:
https://web.archive.org/web/20121115071549/http://lasp.colorado.edu/sorce/images/instruments/sim/fig01.gif
From 2014 (when I used it here at Steve’s) refers to the same useless site at SORCE.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140405093046/http://lasp.colorado.edu/home/sorce/
I did finally manage to find a copy on the Wayback Machine.
https://web.archive.org/web/20130506055716/http://lasp.colorado.edu/sorce/images/instruments/sim/fig01.gif
Which brings me to the main point that Kent Clizbe and I were discussing earlier. NOAA/NASA and CLEAN are coordinating an effort to make sure there is NO INFORMATION except ClimAstrology not only in K through grad school but also on the internet!!!!
……
The discussion between Kent and I starts HERE
This is frightening stuff folks. I knew ‘inconvienent’ information was being removed from the internet but I didn’t know it was a multi-million dollar concerted effort directed by NOAA!!!!
EXCERPT from discussion:
….What was interesting was when I tried to follow up on a pointer to:
(wwwDOT)homepage.montana.edu/~geol445/hyperglac/isostasy1/%20%5C%5C%20Rates
returns
“Sorry….homepage.montana.edu 7Egeol445 hyperglac isostasy1 20 5C 5C 20Rates’ does not exist or is not available.”
So I poked around and found Isostasy and Postglacial Rebound “This resource is no longer officially part of our collection ….” refering to cleanet in the URL.
So I continued poking around and I found it had been removed by the CLEAN project
That goes to TERC (Housed in Commie central aka Cambridge MA. I lived there for a while and the Communists are really up front and in your face not hiding behind socialism!)
Following up on CLEAN (“Climate Literacy and Energy Awareness Network “) from TERC, what do I find? NOAA!
https://www.climate.gov/teaching/about-clean-climate-literacy-and-energy-awareness-network-pathway-0
Teaching Climate »About CLEAN: the Climate Literacy and Energy Awareness Network Pathway
You have to see the interactive header to believe it!
Steve can you do a screen capture of that graph and save it here at your site so it is not ‘disappeared forever’
Gail, there doing it to Heating Degree Days also.
The last four months have been some of the coldest you might ever recall in our lifetime. So far 2015 is the fourth coldest in Maine’s history over the last 120 years. Data from 2013 confirm that so far – from January 1 to April 29 – 2015 has required 4249 heating degree days. That rivals 1904, 1918 and 1923 over the last 120 years. But when I recently looked at NOAA’s revised 2015 data, these last four months now would not even put us in the top twenty of coldest months. The federal government went into the historical data and lowered those earlier years – and other years in the earlier decades – so that they can keep spending $27 billion a year on pushing global warming.
– See more at: http://notrickszone.com/2015/05/02/151-degrees-of-fudging-energy-physicist-unveils-noaas-massive-rewrite-of-maine-climate-history/#sthash.9Z8sb6pV.dpuf
Thanks,
They have done it to most of the temperature record. I used to show a graph of Norfolk City, a city on the North Carolina/Virgina border and right on the ocean, and the near by Norfolk International Airport as well as the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation.
http://digitaldiatribes.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/amoraw200908.png
Norfolk City followed the same curve as the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation while Norfolk International Airport headed straight up with no sign of a curve. It was a really great example of UHI at airports.
Old URL: Norfolk City
data(DOT)giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/gistemp_station.py?id=425723080040&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
Old URL: Norfolk International Airport
data(DOT)giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/gistemp_station.py?id=425723080000&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
The Wayback Machine gives: Page cannot be crawled or displayed due to robots.txt.
Now all that is available is Norfolk Naval Station starting in 1945.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/tmp/gistemp/STATIONS/tmp_425723080040_14_0/station.gif
Here is another example of the state of US Academics having nothing to do with weather or climate except in the human sense. This may also be an eye opener for understanding why the way SF makes war is special: Intelligence: Screw the Academics. http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htintel/articles/20150927.aspx