Half of NASA temperature fraud is manufactured by cooling the past. In 1981, Hansen showed a little over 0.3C surface warming from 1880 to 1980
Now they show almost a full degree warming from 1880 to 1980.
Gavin’s team accomplished this spectacular fraud by cooling the past. The graph below overlays the two images above, normalized to the five year mean of the most recent common years.
The other half of their fraud is accomplished by warming recent years, which I will cover in a later post. Make no mistake about it, NASA and NOAA are engaged in the biggest fraud in science history.
The scam pays good money. Why don’t you join the gravy train and buy yourself a Tesla that magically powers itself from unicorn farts?
http://twitchy.com/2015/09/20/report-climate-scientist-who-wants-to-bring-skeptics-up-on-rico-charges-makes-750kyr-thanks-to-taxpayers/
As long as they can print and as long as people accept this ‘good money’ the Fraud will go on ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gi1v8AvZY4k
Yes sirrah, It pays really good money.
The hourly wage for Climastrologists is one of the highest. link
And that is before the ‘speaking engagements’ Hansen ILLEGALLY earned an additional 1.6 million plus perks while taking a government salary. link
From the Department of Justice:
From NOLO on ‘gifts’
Why isn’t Hansen in jail?
“Why isn’t Hansen in jail?”
Because politicians don’t put fellow politicians in jail — not even when the fellow politician lies that he is a scientist instead of a politician.
Nothing is safe and predictable when criminals are in charge.
I am stilled bothered by the fact, Gail, that you said Carly ‘believes’ in the tooth fa
whoops, make that AGW.
She was second to the Trump in the latest poll. My early picks were 2nd, 3rd, and 4th.
as of the latest.
—-and you know how it is, narcissists in power positions can simply say, ‘I have got a pen and a piece of paper’ and they can put anything on it that they want.
darrylb,
You can watch Carly live dancing around the issue. She only mentions “Clean Coal” (Lots and Lots of $$$ for innovation) She says CAGW is a serious issue and never mentions nuclear as a possible solution.
http://chicksontheright.com/blog/item/30336-carly-fiorina-takes-down-climate-change-alarmism-and-it-is-glorious
After sneaking over to Hubby’s computer and watching this. All I see is re-packaged business as usual, with a dose of how can we get the Sheeple to continue to swallow CAGW now that they have smartened up to the downsides of Solar and Wind.
So what exactly is this Clean Coal that Carly is so in love with?
From Energy dot Gov
Clean Coal is a really big boondoggle. It is even worse than Solar and Wind since if the CO2 is released from storage it will kill you. link
Jo Nova — Carbon capture, clean coal plant goes bankrupt, only $4.4b over budget
So I rate Carly as a Hitlery lite.
The absolute safest and best place to store CO2 is in the atmosphere.
Plenty of room, no holes required.
Will only ever be in trace quantities, no suffocation from massive concentrations and no oxygen.
And it has a massive added benefit that the plants love it, and will keep providing food for the world’s increasing population.
Agreed Andy,
I would like to see CO2 up to 1500 ppm especially as the earth and oceans cool down.
“Why isn’t Hansen in jail?”
Mostly because the law does not apply to the elite’s operatives. Perhaps there might be a presidential candidate willing to test this or talk it up? It would be a simple matter to prosecute a few of these cases, but just one major candidate saying he would consider such prosecution could change behavior dramatically, at least for awhile, even if no prosecution resulted.
Hansen is just a tool, a brownshirt.
Evil has no friends.
I had him pegged as an operative in the “useful idiot” category. He seems to believe his own bull sheet with religious fervor. Often wrong but never in doubt. Unable to admit his mistakes.
Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
Best reblog this post now, before it becomes a criminal offence to publish (no sarc.) ….
Tony
If you grafted the RSS graph onto the original 1981 temperatures you might have a reasonable global temperature record to the present day.
No, even the 1981 Hansen graph was massively corrupted.
OT, you might have heard of those worms that want to bring the RICO act against skeptics.
Well here is the main TROUGHER. !!
http://twitchy.com/2015/09/20/report-climate-scientist-who-wants-to-bring-skeptics-up-on-rico-charges-makes-750kyr-thanks-to-taxpayers/
Thanks AndyG – you beat me to it linking to this post. I mean, you simply cannot make this stuff up! A scumbag grifter demanding RICO investigations for the alleged “crime” of free speech. Amazingly shameless. Love how he has his wife in on it. Nice touch.
It seems Professor Shukla has other family members on the payroll, too. He founded and runs the Institute of Global Environment and Society (IGES) – Climate Research in Service to Society.
He says about himself on the institute’s website: “Professor Shukla is an institution builder.“
I’m sure he is. I wonder how well he’s loved *) by the other members of The Team?
http://www.iges.org/people/shukla.html
———-
*) He has a wiki page marked with this header:
This article is an autobiography or has been extensively edited by the subject or by someone connected to the subject. (April 2008)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jagdish_Shukla
Reblogged this on Climate Collections and commented:
Another way to clearly demonstrate NASA’s manipulation of historical temperature data.