1974 : Sixty Theories To Explain Global Cooling

In the 1960’s there was unanimous agreement among scientists that the Earth was cooling

ScreenHunter_2109 May. 31 08.05

ScreenHunter_2110 May. 31 08.05


By the 1970’s scientists were predicting a new ice age, and had 60 theories to explain it.


20 Nov 1974, Page 17 – at Newspapers.com

Predictably, government climate criminals have recently erased the unanimous consensus of the 1960’s. The post-1945  cooling has disappeared.

Fig.A (5)

But it is worse than it seems. Over the past decade there was unanimous consensus for a decade long global warming hiatus, with 60+ theories to explain it. NOAA climate criminals just erased the hiatus ahead of Paris. History repeats itself.


About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to 1974 : Sixty Theories To Explain Global Cooling

  1. gator69 says:

    I was living in Germany when this article was written, and the Europeans were all abuzz about the coming ice age. It would be interesting to get some foreign language articles to supplement your collection of the “non-existent” ice age scare.

    • rah says:

      I was taking flying lessons in a Cessna 150 and graduated from HS in 74 and was thinking about going into the Army. Would have enlisted at that time had the recruiter not lied to me.

  2. I was going to college during the 70’s ice age. All the political activists were up in arms about the man-made aerosols that were causing the cooling (not the same man made gases that were causing the ozone hole).

    I don’t need to tell you, they were all Neo-Com’s. Nice people, but confused, as anybody would be if he or she smoked dope all day.

    • gator69 says:

      Hey Morgan! Obviously it wasn’t the pot, it is the mental disorder that causes one to be a leftist. I doubt the Pope is a pothead.

  3. PeterK says:

    You’re right gator69, he’s not a pothead but he is a pope-head.

    • gator69 says:

      If Francis wqas simply a harmless pothead or traditional pope-head, that would be workable. The problem is that Francis is a Marxist, and has a most bully pulpit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *