All US Warming, And Almost Half Of The Data, Is Fake

NOAA reports almost two degrees warming in the US, almost all of which is fake, and is derived from fake data. The red line below is the average of all of the measured station data, and the blue line is the average of all of reported station data. The US government has created a completely fake US warming trend, which the thermometers did not measure.

ScreenHunter_10807 Oct. 13 09.21

Reported: ushcn.tavg.latest.FLs.52j.tar.gz
Measured: ushcn.tavg.latest.raw.tar.gz

The graph below shows the spectacular hockey stick of data tampering NOAA is doing to the US data set.

ScreenHunter_10798 Oct. 13 04.09

The primary mechanism they use for this data tampering, is to simply fabricate data. Fake data is marked with an ‘E’ like this data for Baudette, MN. It means they have no underlying data for that station during that month.

ScreenHunter_10802 Oct. 13 04.11

Almost half of their reported data is now fake.

ScreenHunter_10797 Oct. 13 04.08

In 1989, NOAA reported that there had been no warming in the US.

U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend

By PHILIP SHABECOFF, Special to the New York Times Published: January 26, 1989

After examining climate data extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in average temperatures or rainfall in the United States over that entire period.

The study, made by scientists for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was published in the current issue of Geophysical Research Letters. It is based on temperature and precipitation readings taken at weather stations around the country from 1895 to 1987.

U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend – New York Times

In 1999, NASA’s James Hansen reported that much of the US was cooling.

in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

But the fraud is vastly worse than it seems. Since NOAA reported no US warming in 1989, thermometers have continued to show no US warming. One hundred percent of US 1990-2014 warming is due to fake data.

ScreenHunter_10804 Oct. 13 04.48

This is the biggest fraud in history, and more than 97% of climate scientists base their work on completely fraudulent data from NOAA and NASA. The “consensus” is based on sham data.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to All US Warming, And Almost Half Of The Data, Is Fake

  1. Gary H says:

    In an article in the LAT’s the other day – LA is indeed having a heat wave:

    Temperatures soared to 100 degrees over the last three days, making it the longest stretch of scorching triple-digit heat in downtown Los Angeles in more than 25 years, forecasters say.

    A similar three-day stretch of heat occurred in October 1958.

    I note: Another similar stretch – some 69 years prior to the birth of AGW (consensus is CO2 had not risen enough yet to expect a potentially observable human footprint upon global temps. Numerous recognized scientific orgs suggest it was more like the late 1970’s — probably because the Earth was in a cooling cycle from the 1940’s through the late 1970’s) — and without any urban heat island effect was here:

    July 24, 1891 103
    July 25, 1891 109
    July 26, 1891 100

    We’re all familiar with the urban heat island effect. One would assume that it wasn’t in play in Los Angeles, back in the late 1890’s. The EPA, for an urban area of 1 million suggests that it adds something like 5-8 degrees (F) to afternoon highs (and of course – it is held during evening hours.

    So – in looking at the 1891 records – as they were entered in on the log pages back then, we would necessarily need to adjust the temps we take today, upward, in order to determine how hot we’d need to be in order to be as hot (atmosphere) as LA was back then. Using only 5 degrees, Los Angeles would have to hit 108, 114, and 105, respectively, in order to simply tie the old records – perhaps higher as LA is a vast 20 million+ urban center now.

    Imagine the headlines in the LAT’s if downtown experienced three such days, today.

  2. Aphan says:

    Half of the data is made up, but how accurate is the half that is supposedly real?

  3. Dano says:

    How many rubes do you….erm….”think” will believe this, Steve/Tony? ten?



    • Rud Istvan says:

      Dano, I must be one of your 10 rubes. See, when Tony graphs Official NOAA then versus official NOAA now, and they do not agree, then ‘official’ is changing. Us rubes think that aint right. We was either lied to then, or are being lied to now. Stupid rubes not sposed to have enough brain cells to remember and do the comparison.
      Well, this rube has three degrees from Harvard, 13 issued US patents, and three published ebooks. See essay When Data Isn’t in my most recent ebook for a much more extensive critique than just this post by Tony.
      Lets hope your comment was in jest. Else, we now know a true rube–you.

    • tonyheller says:

      When confronted with my claims, NOAA did not deny them. They simply said “the algorithm is working as designed”

  4. Bruce of Newcastle says:

    Meanwhile in the hottest year evah, this article is in the UK Telegraph today.

    Britain faces longest winter in 50 years after earliest ever arrival of Siberian swan

    The rest of the EU is pretty cold right now too.

    How can global warming cause winters colder than the last 49? Especially when the 2010 UK winter at the bottom of the last solar cycle was so extremely cold? Global cooling of course can do that though.

  5. CheshireRed says:

    Another bang to rights hatchet job. Splendid stuff.

  6. Lawrence13 says:

    You seem to do lots of good exposure work but the trouble is I can’t verify the truth in my own mind (just not bright enough ) I now see that Joe B is quoting NCEP ‘s data and seemingly changing position from cooling to resumed warming. I note that NCEP is NOAA therefore has or is data being nobbled?

    We have had this concerted effort this year with you, Paul Homeward and Jennifer Marahosey in Australia , challenging the data presented to us by primarily NASA /NOAA and talk of other scientist questioning the honesty of this information being fed to the public. Yet all seems to have gone quiet on this so what’s happening on this front. As for Joe’s reliance on NCEO, can he trust that or has the data yet again been tampered with. I have to say with a president and a staff team around him who desperately need to prove global warming, then nobbled is a good explanation.

    • tonyheller says:

      Anthony Watts did an amazing job of undermining this story in its infancy.

    • Karl W. Braun says:

      Big Joe has been saying that temps will increase on account of the El Nino. This is already starting to show up in the NCEP index and is likely to shortly show in the two sat indices as well. Yet he also added that once the El Nino subsides early next year, the temps will begin to make their plunge as the La Nina takes hold.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.