The Key Criminals Behind The Climate Scam

  1. Barack Obama (being severely mentally ill) is determined to convince people that he saved the planet, and no fraud, lie or abuse of power is too great towards that end.
  2. John Cook. After losing the science debate, John Cook was commissioned by the White House to produce a fake 97% number. This allows people like the Sierra Club to ignore all data, and simply chant over and over again that 97% of imaginary scientists agree with their bullshit.
  3. Naomi Oreskes. Naomi’s job was to create an imaginary conspiracy of skeptics being funded by big oil. Her fraud forms the basis for the lunacy of scientists asking to have skeptics prosecuted.
  4. Gavin Schmidt/Tom Karl. Their job was to tamper with data, make the hiatus disappear, and declare 2015 to be the hottest year ever – ahead of Paris.
  5. Michael Mann. No BS is too big for Mikey to tell the press. He is the go to man for spreading the latest fraud.
  6. Katherine Hayhoe. Katherine may actually believe her own BS, and is simply stupid.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

28 Responses to The Key Criminals Behind The Climate Scam

  1. omanuel says:

    We are dealing with scientific fraud beyond comprehension!

    But do not be discouraged. We had to find the problem before it could be remedied.

    Lest anyone gets depressed over the sad state of the science in the world today, let us remember Max Planck recognized in 1944 a “conscious and intelligent Mind” guides the force that holds spinning sub-atomic particles together as atoms, lives and planets.

    We have nothing to fear. The ending will confirm ancient teachings, e.g.,
    Truth is victorious, never untruth!”

  2. Brent Thale says:

    Al Gore doesn’t rate a mention?

  3. Menicholas says:

    Did you hear these presidential candidates on TV tonight?
    Every one of them is hook line and sinker for this garbage, discussing it as if it was fact, rather than complete made-up nonsense!
    Very discouraging, until I think about how unlikely any of them can possibly be elected.
    They were obviously coached to be sure to bring it up, as it is difficult to believe these people are so totally buffaloed by the whole scam.

    • DD More says:

      Unelectable? Not if you get Google rooting for you.

      Imagine an election—a close one. You’re undecided. So you type the name of one of the candidates into your search engine of choice. (Actually, let’s not be coy here. In most of the world, one search engine dominates; in Europe and North America, it’s Google.) And Google coughs up, in fractions of a second, articles and facts about that candidate. Great! Now you are an informed voter, right?
      In other words: Google’s ranking algorithm for search results could accidentally steal the presidency. “We estimate, based on win margins in national elections around the world,” says Robert Epstein, a psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology and one of the study’s authors, “that Google could determine the outcome of upwards of 25 percent of all national elections.”
      One group saw positive articles about one candidate first; the other saw positive articles about the other candidate. (A control group saw a random assortment.) The result: Whichever side people saw the positive results for, they were more likely to vote for—by more than 48 percent. The team calls that number the “vote manipulation power,” or VMP. The effect held—strengthened, even—when the researchers swapped in a single negative story into the number-four and number-three spots.

      • Gail Combs says:

        I saw this in action in the last election. Google did nothing but spew vile ad homs about my choice of candidate for state senate. There was NOTHING available where he was allowed to defend himself. Since I know him, I also know he had good defense against the vile ad homs but google never showed them. Despite this he got 48% of the vote.

  4. Marsh says:

    There is a form of Megalomania with many of these Alarmists. AGW serves as a platform to propel their mission in life to greater heights ; but society, is pulled down as a consequence.
    Hayhoe does appear to be an exception in this list ; having a different form of mental illness.

  5. 7. The guy who runs Wikipedia, for publishing Climate Grantology on his site

  6. Richard Keen says:

    How about Mister T, aka Kevin?
    Having successfully censored Chris Landsea’s chapter on hurricanes for IPCC AR4 and replaced it with his own amateur version, and oh so subtly attributes everything else (like the Boulder flood) to global warming (while mealy mouthing that “no individual event….”), and has now called for the arrest and conviction of those with whom he disagrees, is highly qualified to be our nominee for Minister of Truth.

  7. JPinBalt says:

    You forgot about all the gov. appointed bureaucrats in the IPCC, abet Dr Rajendra Pachauri has other charges on his secret personal want promoting localized AGW global warming; and the big money corporations sucking like solar battery and panel firms, Solandra, wind farms, Elon Musk and Tesla, you can make millions off this and corporate subsidies, we are talking $ billions given away by gov., makes research budget of a university prof supported by promoting climate change BS a hill of beans in comparison as far as money which can be made with libtard votes. I want to see congressional hearings for criminals like data fakers like Gavin Schmidt.

    Aside, while migrant issue is currently destroying EU, liberal/progressives/socialist/closet totalitarianists promoting as help, also have “climate refugees” as side issue, … well … still about money.
    110 states endorse action to help climate migrants

    I guess climate refugees can freely go without visas or passports to EU and freeze in tents at new 5,000 people “jungle” illegal migrant city in Calais camped this winter just hoping for global warming to keep warm. Or, maybe they should hope for opposite, If North Sea freezes for global cooling and ice age (thousands of years off – opps) then can walk to UK over ice for benefits instead of jumping lorries to jump on or sneaking for 50K walk to UK in Euro-tunnel. Climate refugees, joke, but you have some country with an excuse to try to get money from another.

    Wish you would have a general link to toss/dump you such articles, but then you would be overwhelmed with the daily news BS out everyday.

  8. Andy Oz says:

    Not holding back today. I also blame:
    8. The carbon credit shysters who dreamt up this global taxation system.
    9. The 384 odd billionaires who demand one world government, a global military police, a single currency, a global taxation system, and debt burdened working slaves across the world to pay that carbon tax.
    10. The pope for trying to distract the media with a pro-climate change PR stunt from the chronic paedophilia that is endemic in the Catholic Church.
    11. The BOM climate scientists for selling out to Al Gore et al and fraudulently adjusting all the Australian historical climate data.
    12. Dumb-ass politicians who failed science at school, became left wing lawyers & union hacks, entered parliament and then saw an opportunity to maintain their snouts in the trough of tax payers hard earned for ever, using irrational scare tactics.
    13. The education system that requires sheep, not free thinking individuals.

    • darrylb says:

      but add number 14. College/university instructors who have made a career out it, most often in ancillary subfields. Some are teaching classes entitled ‘How to teach and convince people about climate change’
      and #15 the MSM which perpetuates a completely skewed stack of selected info.
      In that business bad news is good news and good news is no news.

      Of course our host was naming the individuals, and to that list number 7 could be the Great Britain gentleman who lost information at hadcrut and did so much more crap as shown in the climategate emails.

    • Andy DC says:

      All of the above has resulted in a new wave of world communism, per Bernie Sanders, with the ultimate goal of taking away our rights to privacy, convenience, comfort, self protection and freedom. Where we have no cars or electricity. Where we live in communes, sowing love beads and singing folk songs around the camp fire. How exciting!

  9. Old Goat says:

    All in all, we don’t stand an earthly, do we, with all those oddball elements united and stacked against us?

  10. Russell says:

    We are experiencing the effects of a State imposed Ideology. Climate Change is a major part of the ideological system–you must believe in it or you oppose the State’s power and authority. Currently it’s enforced via federal funding and the PC police. The State has used the power of the Judicial and Executive branches to circumvent the Legislature and impose various rules, guide lines and standards to prop climate change.

    This type of heavy handed bureaucratic behavior is reminiscent of the old Soviet Union where the population was property of the State. Soon politicians tend to re-enforce a State ideology by arresting and prosecuting opponents on whatever charges they can trump up. There have already been calls for death and imprisonment of climate change deniers.

    The media is not dis-similar to the State and for the most part it is a mouthpiece for the ideology; praising and supporting climate change adherents while punishing and demonizing anyone with an opposing view. Beyond that, try having an online discussion about any part of climate change–any hint of opposition will bring a pro-climate change troll down on your head–policing the ideology.

    Unfortunately, State Ideology has the power of law regardless of how ignorant the imposed rules are–reality seldom affects the course of events. I expect things to get worse very soon.

  11. rachase says:

    What I truly wonder about, is just how those who are responsible for the policy of the National Academy of Science, assuming that they at one time were real scientists, can openly endorse what is blatantly contrary to the scientific process. By facilitating the use of terms such as “consensus” and “settled science”, as well as not forcefully denouncing the “97%” lie, they prostitute and make fools of themselves, and destroy what back in more rational times was a reputable organization.

    • Marsh says:

      rachase : A very good point you make. A few years ago , I had to review my research again ; doubting myself regarding the AGW and CO2 hypothesis,,, wondering how such a professional organisation could get it so wrong , by them supporting Global Warming… Of course, right & wrong has nothing to do with it; it’s all about the Academy placing power & money ahead of their reputation,,, I agree, they sold out !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *