Both the frequency of hot days and the areal coverage of hot days has rapidly declined in the US. Last year had the smallest areal coverage on record for 95 degree days, with only 55% of US HCN stations reaching 95 degrees during the year. In 1931, 93% of the US reached 95 degrees.
The fraudsters at Climate Central claim the exact opposite of what the data shows. For example, they say that Fond Du Lac, WI will average 89°F during summers in the future.
Blistering Future Summers for 1,001 U.S. Cities | Climate Central
The frequency of 89 degree days in Fond Du Lac has dropped by two thirds since the 19th century, with the vast majority of thir hot days occurring with CO2 below 350 PPM.
Not only is their claim empirically flawed, but it has no theoretical basis. Radiative transfer models show that the amount of downwelling longwave radiation during mid-latitude summers hardly increases with increasing CO2.
There is no empirical or theoretical basis for the Climate Central claims. They are 100% fraudulent. Climate criminals make Enron accountants look like Mother Theresa.
Hey everyone here – pitch in to this guy if you use his material or are interested (if you have not already)…. I gave 5 bucks, its not a lot but give what you can – this gentleman has helped me keep my sanity, and I am sure some of you as well with his diligence, incredible compilation of facts both through graphs and most important historical records – this is no easy job… I plan on giving him 5 bucks a week through at least December when the Knuckleheads meet in their posh Paris setting.
I hope people have seen this. (from WUWT)
http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2015/1028/NOAA-refuses-to-comply-with-House-science-committee-subpoena
Are they (NOAA) not being paid with our tax dollars, and is not everything that they produce as a result, the property of ‘we the people’? The fact that they refuse to comply with such a subpoena speaks volumes.
Universities teach basic climate science with a claim that ~239.7 W/sqm from the Sun combines with 239.7 downwelling longwave IR to cause a 30 degree surface heating.
Ref – http://www.atmos.washington.edu/2002Q4/211/notes_greenhouse.html
This unambiguously states that the atmospheric infrared radiation has equal heating power to the Solar radiation.
In mid winter here at 27 degrees south the Sun is at an effective elevation of ~50 degrees to the normal at midday – 27 + 23.
Using the accepted 0.3 albedo the incident normal radiation is of the order of ~616 W/sqm for 50 degrees – 0.7 x 1370 x cos 50.
When the Sun is low in the sky at say 30 degrees in the morning the incident normal radiation is of the order of ~616 x sin 30 or about 308 W/sqm – roughly equivalent to the radiated power emitted by a block of ice according to the Stefan-Boltzmann equation using the Engineering Toolbox value for emissivity of ice as 0.98.
Hands up all those who consider these 2 radiation values equal. I used a small magnifying glass to burn a piece of timber using ~308 W/sqm solar radiation.
Strangely enough it didn’t work using the IR from a nearby brick wall radiating a higher numerical value of ~375 W/sqm from its 12 degree C temperature using a parabolic metal mirror.
That is what is wrong with computer models – 2 numerically equal values for radiation fluxes in W/sqm can be entirely different in their capacity to transfer energy capable of inducing heating.
Computer models and climate science treat them as equal when really we all know they are not.
The claim that atmospheric downwelling longwave IR has equal heating power to the incident solar radiation is absurd.
YES!
Here are the actual numbers to compare photons of EUV/UV/Vis from the sun to MIR from CO2 at the 15-um C02 band.
WIKI chart
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/eb/Light_spectrum.svg/2000px-Light_spectrum.svg.png
(EUV/UV/Vis)
1 eV = 1.60217657e-19 Joules
(MIR )
meV = 1.60217662e-22 joules
Gone from ridiculous to absurd. Wonder how much they got paid to come up with this drivel?
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/28/american-academy-of-pediatrics-global-warming-is-going-to-kill-your-kids/
What is appearing more ; is extreme Cold !
It is amazing how these clowns have convinced a large segment of the population that we are undergoing catastrophic warming, when it actually has been cooling.
Andy. A large segment of the population thinks it’s have no problem allowing people to vote without an ID! A large segment of the population believes that allowing the government to take away their best tool for defense of self and home will make them safer. A large segment of the population believes that the Confederate Flag is evil. A large segment of the population believed that Barack Hussein Obama did such a good job his first term that he needed to be reelected. etc, etc, etc, ad nauseum
Climate Central has become almost as bad as skepticalscience
I’m serious, they are actually losing it
All they need to do is keep up the hype for a few more months. As Lord Monckton forecast they got rid of Harper in Canada, and Abbott in Australia and so long as the Rebooblicans continue to sit with their thumbs in their mouths the United Nations will succeed in making the USA a vassal state of the UN with no sovereignty or freedom.
Remember the UK was sold out by their politicians too. Was Britain Taken into the EU Illegally?
The Powers That Be keep putting off a vote in Britian. No doubt they hope the World Government will be in place before they have to answer to the voters and then it will be way too late. Pascal Lamy told us point blank the goal of ALL world leaders was a world government back in the 1930s when the League of Nations was formed. He also told us that the European Union was the pilot project.
http://www.theglobalist.com/storyid.aspx?StoryId=9174
http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl220_e.htm
This is old but an accurate forecast of the goals based on actual documents.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/yates/yates14.html
The two biggies to be agreed on in December is a guilt tax on the USA of ONE TRILLION DOLLARS A YEAR, and a WORLD SUPREME COURT to enforce that tax.
If those are agreed to by Obama then it is a done deal. Ratification by the Senate is NOT NEEDED!
DOES US LAW SUPERSEDE INTERNATIONAL LAW?
However under International Law the President of the United States can sign binding contracts with other Nations. These contracts are considered treaties under International Law and unless their unconstitutionality was manifestly obvious to the other nations at the time the treaty was contracted the United States is stuck with it even if it is later found Unconstitutional within the United States.
This is why that WORLD SUPREME COURT means a complete loss of sovereignty.
31 Oct: STEALTH AGENDA: New UN Tribunal to Judge US for “Climate Debt”