Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is โThirstier.โ”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Bob G on Time Of Observation Bias
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
I’m gonna guess that you are moving the same direction as the freight, and the FT is passing your commuter train. ๐
of course the commuter could be stopped and the cameraman bobbing up and down to create an illusion. Or the freight stopped… there’s simply no way to tell whether the frame of reference is moving and which way? I see five possibilities: 1&2 either train could be stationary but not both, 3 Both moving to the right but Freight is faster, 4 Both moving left but commuter is faster, 5 Both moving in opposite directions. I’m with the ‘not enough information’ [Nobama] crowd. Most likely is that the commuter train is leftbound passing a stopped freight to merge back onto the track ahead of it, But I’ve personally experienced all five possibilities I listed above.
Everything’s relative.
Like our country. When it’s movement to the left slows, the Left says it’s moving to the right.
… its movement, dammit …
Thanks for knowing the difference. So few do anymore. Of course, this iPad has a will of its own and always tries to second guess me. I have to remember to read everything again to see what ridiculous supposition it has made about what I intended. Maddening!
My dad says the spell check was designed by a leftist liberal…they always believe they know what you should say better than you do. ?
I’m thinking of changing my moniker to it’s = it is. The rules are simple, but seeing this error (and others) repeatedly convinces people that inaccurate usage is correct and accepted.
Towards its destination?
Yes, but it will never get there.
https://coloradowellington.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/zenos-absence.jpg
https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net/hprofile-ak-xfa1/v/t1.0-1/p160x160/1922298_618879381499478_1580359140_n.jpg?oh=a34a4c2a8720d94236989c2ed74a743e&oe=5698FF1E&__gda__=1453722789_afefef9bd5ee5c147f41712ce6c9ad33
I could see the illusion with another train. But then it passed a concrete structure. You got me!!! ๐
Or maybe you are considering the spin of the earth, you know, like the AGW spin ๐
Or dah, maybe someone else is taking a picture of the train you are one—the other train?
As long as it is your decision which way to move .
https://youtu.be/oshYn8rbBuM
To the left, and there is nothing you can do bout it.
The same direction as the engine is moving.
The correct answer is: Not enough information to determine this.
The direction your train is moving is forward, comrade.