More Detail On NASA Global Temperature Fraud

In 1999, NASA showed 0.6C warming from 1880 to 1997.



Now they show more than 1C warming from 1880 to 1997.

graph (2)

graph.png (1130×600)

The graph below overlays the 1999 and 2016 versions, and shows how they cooled pre-1980 years and warmed post-1980 years.


This closeup shows how they have altered their data outside of their own blue error bars. The data has been altered by almost 200% of the size of the 1930 error bar.  No one outside of government would get away with such glaring malfeasance for very long.


The current NASA graph shows a sharp warming after 1970. This coincides with 80% station loss after 1970. NASA is losing their cooler rural stations and skewing the data with hot urban stations. Also note that most of their remaining stations did not exist in the hot 1930’s.


The surface temperature record is complete garbage, but it has been carefully manipulated to produce the results politicians want. So the US space agency ignores satellite measurements of the troposphere, and uses temperatures from concrete jungles instead.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to More Detail On NASA Global Temperature Fraud

  1. phil jones says:

    Brilliant discovery Tony… Very Nobel Science…

    Unfortunately today’s ScYience is what gets the $$ funding, prestige, and Nobel despite the lies and fraud… Today’s Progressives want Court Hearings and RICO charges for your honest work… Progressives = today’s fascists…

  2. phil jones says:

    Based on this Russian Hockey Stick Model… With its massive curve… I predict that Arctic Ice has already disappeared… The Arctic is lying to us… Crops are down despite record yields… Plants are lying… Somebody fund me a grant fir this $$ great work..

    Gavin? Mikey..

  3. Stewart Pid says:

    Tony you say “The surface temperature record is complete garbage” … total nonsense …. this is the best surface temperature record money can buy ;-)

  4. Dan zielinski says:

    Thank you again for your persistent efforts. Hope you’re training a protege!

  5. Rud Istvan says:

    One of your best simple illustrations. The error bar error is telling.

    Attached is another stark simple example, this time NOAA’s switch to ‘new and improved’ NClimDiv. Same was the case for California and Michigan (illustrated in essay When Data Isn’t in ebook Blowing Smoke). In fact, all but 8 CONUS states got warmed, and the CONUS warming trend got doubled–by a NOAA software ‘upgrade’.
    Use as you see fit; copyright is waived.

  6. Windsong says:

    The Hans Christian Andersen story “The Emperor’s New Clothes” comes to mind. In this case, Tony fulfills the part of the young boy who points out the obvious. NASA and researchers with their snout in the federal research trough fulfill the role of the scheming weavers. U.S. Senators with an inability to simply read the material Tony has assembled fulfill the role of the emperor’s ministers. Of course, our modern day ministers will insist on the floor of the Senate that NASA has clothes and that Tony is merely denying their existence because he can’t see them. ;)

  7. RickS says:

    Temperature recording stations should be constructed via the following detailed description for the “Highest” accuracy !

    1. Place the temperature apparatus (Thermometer) as close to the ground as possible as to not allow “any” of the heat to disseminate (i.e. escape) !
    2. Surround the apparatus with steel walls on all “4” sides yet allowing enough “direct” Sun light as possible to shine down on the instruments !
    3. Put the “entire” apparatus on a very large Parking lot paved preferably with “Asphalt” !
    4. It is absolutely required that the Asphalt parking lot be used for Big-Rig Trucks to allow them to “idle” their engines surrounding the Temperature Meter Apparatus allowing for complete air circulation (If certain “radiators” are not functioning, then that’s fine) !
    5. And last but not least, “never” calibrate temperatures on cloudy days as to sku actual temperatures on sunny, cloudless days !

    And there you have it !!!

    Sincerely yours

    Charles Frank Bolden, Jr.- Director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency
    (Your trusted source for Climate Information)

  8. gator69 says:

    This coincides with 80% station loss after 1970. NASA is losing their cooler rural stations and skewing the data with hot urban stations.

    Yep! And this was one of the final nails in the coffin for AGW as far as I am concerned. When I learned of this, and made the calculations, it all added up to pure fraud. Rural midwestern stations that have remained uncorrupted by UHI show zero warming over the past century.

    • phil jones says:

      Seems NASA/NOAA would want more data, more stations…. Not less to evaluate Climate Change…

    • Windsong says:

      I wonder when NOAA will routinely release Climate Reference Network information for the US, as these are state of the art (and redundant) instruments in rural locations. The differences between CRN sites and the closest USHCN can be huge.

      The example I watch in my state is the USHCN site at Spokane Intl Airport and the CRN site at Turnbull Natl Wildlife Refuge, 17 miles directly south of the airport, but at the same elevation. Today at 0555 PDT, Spokane was 63F, Turnbull was 49F. (I have seen a difference as high as 20F.) The airport USHCN site is between a taxiway and a parking apron. The CRN site is unaffected by pavement.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.