The Ultimate Idiotic Appeal To Authority

Dan says that the massive evidence of fraud and malfeasance I present can’t be real, because scientists don’t lie. This is the standard progressive response, based on nothing other than ignoring data and a blind faith in corrupt institutions.

Screen Shot 2016-08-20 at 3.00.41 AM

August 20, 2016 at 8:08 am

The National Institute of Health says otherwise.

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

a research finding is less likely to be true when ….  there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice ….. . Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias. 

Screen Shot 2016-08-20 at 2.57.26 AM

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to The Ultimate Idiotic Appeal To Authority

  1. Dave N says:

    It grates on me when someone proclaims “science!” as if it ends an argument because someone did “science”. I doubt that those who do even know what science means, and that “doing” it doesn’t instantly reveal truth.

    I expect that those who propagate the label “science d*niers” (including government and the MSM) are largely to blame for this mess, mainly because they want the term to be brief. It creates a false impression that those they’re attempting to label are scientifically illiterate and/or because it conflicts with their preconceptions.

    That makes it all the more ironic, because they have the preconception that people doing science are infallible.

  2. RAH says:

    Dan must believe that there was never a pause and that Texas is still in permanent drought.

  3. Gail Combs says:

    ‘Science’ is now the new religion and ‘scientists’ the new priests. If you do not adhere to this new religion as handed down by the elite who control the media and politicians and therefore the grants to universities you are branded HERETIC!

    Just ask Tim Ball, Willie Soon, Dr Happer, Murry Salby, Bob Carter and the many many others who tried to buck the system. (I would also add Dr Gray may he rest in peace.)

    Survey shocker: Liberal profs admit they’d discriminate against conservatives in hiring, advancement

    Liberal academics use ‘climate science’ to suppress independent thinkers

    Universities Getting the Most Government Money

  4. Gail Combs says:

    Dan, believes that SHAMING will work on contrary heretics.

    Sorry Dude, if we were not immune to shaming and all the rest of the tricks in the progressive tool box we would already be unthinking brain dead zombies like you.

    • RAH says:

      I’m not sure that’s it Gail. He may be one of those that like many others, finds it far more comfortable to believe that people like their medical doctor can’t be wrong and have risen above all the frailties in human nature and mankind in general that plague us mere mortals. It is a very comfortable delusion. One where the government and scientists and the MDs, and other healthcare providers are infallible.

      • Gail Combs says:

        As I said Brain Dead Zombie….

        • Gail Combs says:

          These fools would only be mildly irritating if they were not aiding those who wish to enslave the entire world.

          Once they start aiding ‘The Enemy’ those who wish to treat humans as cattle*, then they become traitors whether they know it or not.
          ………….
          *Humans seen as cattle straight from Fabian co-founder George Bernard Shaw

          KILLING THOSE “UNFIT TO LIVE”
          “The moment we face it frankly we are driven to the conclusion that the community has a right to put a price on the right to live in it … If people are fit to live, let them live under decent human conditions. If they are not fit to live, kill them in a decent human way. Is it any wonder that some of us are driven to prescribe the lethal chamber as the solution for the hard cases which are at present made the excuse for dragging all the other cases down to their level, and the only solution that will create a sense of full social responsibility in modern populations?”

          Source: George Bernard Shaw, Prefaces (London: Constable and Co., 1934), p. 296.

          “Under Socialism, you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live, you would have to live well.”

          George Bernard Shaw: The Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism and Capitalism, 1928, pg. 470

          Sure sounds like the way a farmer treats his livestock.

          And the brain washing is working:
          Peter Singer’s Bold Defense of Infanticide: Singer is the Decamp Professor of Bio-Ethics at Princeton University. ” In 1979 he wrote,“Human babies are not born self-aware, or capable of grasping that they exist over time. They are not persons”; therefore, “the life of a newborn is of less value than the life of a pig, a dog, or a chimpanzee.””

          After-Birth Abortions: College Students Increasingly Support Infanticide “… in interviews that not only do they see more college students willing to say they support post-birth abortion, but some students even suggest children up to 4 or 5-years-old can also be killed, because they are not yet “self aware.”’

  5. Daniel Zielinski says:

    Mr Heller – do you ever sleep? Amazing stuff you find. Thank you.

  6. gator69 says:

    I guess Dan never heard of the Piltdown Man.

  7. Sunsettommy says:

    Dan,writes like a sycophant who shows no trace of skepticism at all. A child following science gods, who would never let him down he believes.

    A classic brainless warmist is what we see here.

    Retraction Watch shows that numerous examples of bad science papers passing “peer review” process even when the papers are obviously garbage.

    http://retractionwatch.com/

  8. Tim A says:

    Dan sounds like a wide-eyed HS student in awe of his (extreme leftist) biology teacher….

  9. johnbuk says:

    Dan leaves his stocking out for Santa Claus on Christmas Eve – now, no-one say a word, it would be too unkind.

  10. oeman50 says:

    I have also noted people such as Dan tend to think “science” is a machine that you put the data into and crank out the right answer. What baloney. It is just a way to organize your own thinking to try to avoid bonehead mistakes. And it doesn’t work all the time, especially if you are already a big bonehead, right Mickey?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *