Climate Fraud Is Unequivocal, Substantial And Ongoing

Hot off the press. A new study complete with a carefully cherry-picked start date of 1980 and based on fraudulent data – designed to mislead and misinform the reader.


Nonlinear response of mid-latitude weather to the changing Arctic : Nature Climate Change

They started the study immediately after after the coldest year on record in the Arctic. Difficult to imagine how anyone calling themself a scientist could be so cynical.


Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis

Then they make this wildly fraudulent claim.

12 of the past 15 years have exhibited the largest annual mean surface air temperature anomalies since 1900

The basis of this claim is fraudulent NASA/NOAA data, which over the past five years has cooled the 1940’s by about 1-2ºC in the Arctic – via good old-fashioned data tampering.


Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis


Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis


Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis

So why did NASA and NOAA cool the 1940’s? Because it was very warm and the ice was disappearing – and they don’t want you to know about it.


23 Feb 1940 – THE NORTH POLE. – Trove


Papers Past | WARMER ARCTIC (Auckland Star, 1940-12-14)

Climategate E-mails show that in 2009, climate scientists discussed removing the 1940’s warmth, and sometime after 2011 they did it.

From: Tom Wigley <>
To: Phil Jones <>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <>

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

Scientists have been making ice-free Arctic predictions for as long as anyone can remember. The claim that Arctic sea ice used to be very thick and stable, when it wasn’t.


The Changing Face of the Arctic; The Changing Face of the Arctic – The New York Times

The ice was two meters thick in 1958. The ice is two meters thick now.

cice_combine_thick_sm_en_20161028 cice_combine_thick_sm_en_20160328

CICE_combine_thick_SM_EN_20161028.png (758×631)

Climate science is one giant Ponzi scheme, with one layer of fraud and deception built on top of another.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Climate Fraud Is Unequivocal, Substantial And Ongoing

  1. gnome says:

    Drain the swamp!

  2. RAH says:

    They can play with the numbers all they want. 1980 to 2015 is weather not climate. I Love how they use a global air temp anomalies map from January 2016 when the El Nino was still having significant effect.

  3. Lance says:

    Eureka, Nunavut in 1979, Feb, set the N. American record for coldest month recorded. -47.9C was the mean…. (I arrived thankfully in March)…but yes, 1979 was a cold year in the arctic, and we had loads of ice then….Thankfully, the earth has ‘warmed’ up a bit as cold is not fun at all.

    • RAH says:

      It’s cold as a witches mammary gland in North and Central Asia right now. That cold will be coming here. When it’s warmer than normal in the Arctic then it’s a time to be looking out for colder than normal temps to hit N. America somewhere. Come the middle of November it will be winter coat weather for we in the NE and MW US and it’s gonna stay that way for the winter months. Nothing like last winter.

    • AndyG55 says:

      Some AGW twerp on Roy’s site posted a pdf about arctic sea ice, without looking at its content.. DOH

      This chart of temps is from that pdf.

      The data matches other in-GISSed Iceland data.

  4. AndyG55 says:

    And the Reykjavik temps scaled on top of the AMO

  5. stpaulchuck says:

    they do the same thing with “since the beginning of the Industrial Age”, which coincidentally is around 1850, which also happens to be around the end of the Little Ice Age. So the Little Ice Age ended and it got warmer. Who’d of thunk it.

  6. David A says:

    Where have all the Trolls gone?

  7. Andy DC says:

    It is very easy to cherry pick any weather pattern over the short term and claim it is warming, cooling, wetting, drying or whatever. If you go back far enough in time, any given weather pattern has almost always happened sometime earlier in the past.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *