The Last CNN Debate – Blatant Collusion With The Democrats

The last time CNN did a presidential debate, they blatantly colluded with and cheated for Barack Obama. So much so that Obama was unafraid to blurt it out on national television.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to The Last CNN Debate – Blatant Collusion With The Democrats

  1. D. Self says:

    I don’t understand why they continue to agree to be moderated by leftists. It will be 3 on one tonight.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Because the GOPe (establishment) is the controlled opposition and they are owned by the same globalist masters as the Democrats. The elections are just a dog and pony show to keep the masses quiet.

      “The chief problem of American political life for a long time has been how to make the two congressional parties more national and international. The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so the that American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.”

      Quote from Tragedy and Hope, 1966 by Carroll Quigley, member of Council on Foreign Relations, mentor to Bill Clinton.

      • D. Self says:

        I agree, but then Trump is not the “change” candidate based on this. Have we been fooled?

        • Neal S says:

          Oh, but Trump *IS* the ‘change’ candidate. This is why everyone, including those who are Republicans, are against him.

          Should Trump get elected, it will be despite the efforts of the Republican establishment, and not because of it.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Either we vote Hillary and the US Constitutional Republic dies and we end up in a nuclear war with Russia and China.
          (Yeah, I can write a book proving that or you can read Pascal Lamy, Carroll Quigley, Judicial Watch and the Wikileak dumps and the comments linked below.)

          We vote The Donald and hope like heck he can cause a major change for the better.

          OR we have an armed revolution and the entire world blows up. (China and Russia will take advantage.)

          Those are your actual picks and the ONLY picks.
          You have less than a month to do the research and see that I am NOT kidding.
          …….

          Here are a few of my comments on the subject
          Tony Blair, Middle-East, gold and Gadhafi
          https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/05/27/gun-control-has-been-used-by-governments-to-kill-more-than-50-million-of-their-own-people/#comment-358599

          Then Hillary and Benghazi
          https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2016/10/08/hillary-wikileaks-trump-issues-collection/#comment-72931

          And go from there with a search for Benghazi in that thread to see the outright lies Hillary has told.

          That is in and of it’s self bad enough however the problem is certain countries, mainly the BRICS and esp Russia and China have figured out the bankers and are challenging them.

          They are buying up gold and mining gold and have challenged the World Bank/IMF/US Petrodollar system just like Gadhafi did. The Elite can not allow such a challenge or the whole fiat currency mess falls down around their ears.

          The BRICS countries are:
          Brazil
          Russia
          India
          China
          South Africa
          Details on gold buying and BRICS development bank HERE

          This is WHY Soros and his buddies want a war with Russia. They completely screwed themselves by weaking the USA and building up China, India and other countries.

          Both Russia and China tossed Soros and his Open Society agitators out on their ear meaning they have zero intention of agreeing to being vassal states of a global government.

          • D. Self says:

            Don’t get me wrong I would vote for rock over Hillary.

          • Gail Combs says:

            A rock would be safer that Hillary.

            Come to that I would prefer a nice piece of inert rock over 90% of the politicians in the USA.

            I would be an Anacrocapitalist if I didn’t think “The Thugs on Horseback” would always manage to turn anything but a real country with a standing military into a dictatorship.

            Bullies only understand force.

  2. just a thought says:

    Isn’t that called “racketeering?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.