When Was The Last Time Democrats Were This Angry?

It has been 150 years since Democrats were this angry, after we shut down their slavery business.

Democrats were so angry about what Republicans were doing, they organized mass protests and started the Civil War.

After losing the Civil War, Democrats organized more mass protests and started the Ku Klux Klan.

Then they organized Planned Parenthood to kill off black people.

When Democrats get mad, they invariably return to their violent, racist roots.

Because violence, killing, hatred and mayhem is “who Democrats are.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

53 Responses to When Was The Last Time Democrats Were This Angry?

  1. Steve Case says:

    Good one Tony – Left-wing politics has left an incredible trail of death and destruction.

  2. ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑☼N says:

    So true, but don’t expect to see it in the NY Times.

  3. Steve Case says:

    Just in case you don’t understand who’s running the show just over our northern border:

    The Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today issued the following statement on the death of former Cuban President Fidel Castro:

    “It is with deep sorrow that I learned today of the death of Cuba’s longest serving President.

    “Fidel Castro was a larger than life leader who served his people for almost half a century. A legendary revolutionary and orator, Mr. Castro made significant improvements to the education and healthcare of his island nation.

    “While a controversial figure, both Mr. Castro’s supporters and detractors recognized his tremendous dedication and love for the Cuban people who had a deep and lasting affection for “el Comandante”.

    “I know my father was very proud to call him a friend and I had the opportunity to meet Fidel when my father passed away. It was also a real honour to meet his three sons and his brother President Raúl Castro during my recent visit to Cuba.

    “On behalf of all Canadians, Sophie and I offer our deepest condolences to the family, friends and many, many supporters of Mr. Castro. We join the people of Cuba today in mourning the loss of this remarkable leader.”

    Source

    • Stewart Pid says:

      Steve I think you need to put stuff like this in context. Little Trudeau sez what he feels is politically correct and was being condescending at the time of Fidels death. Also, his dad was friends with Fidel and that is an entire different story which you can look into on your own but Fidel was a pall bearer at Pierre’s funeral and so there are family ties there.
      As a side note the US is not faultless in the mess that is Cuba … ie Bay of Pigs etc
      Little Trudeau has been Prime Minister for all of 18 months after ~ 10 years of a conservative Prime Minister so the “who’s running the show” comment seems a little over the top.

      • Gail Combs says:

        Well it is certainly NOT Little Trudeau who is running the show. He has never been successful at anything he tried.

        • SxyxS says:

          Well,at least they succeeded in canada to put one family member after another with the Trudeaus
          while they failed with the Clintons(but succeeded with the Bushs)

          And nowadays modern democratic klu klux klan
          members(LBGT,Feminists,SJW etc)
          will wage terror until the corporations and media get the president of their choice.

        • Stewart Pid says:

          Gail either you are ignorant or just being pig headed. Justin was a decent MP for the riding of Papineau and elected in 2008, 2011 and 2015 which I would consider “successful”.
          I don’t really like Justin and he is a shadow of the man his father was but he is no dummy. A bit of a lost soul yes as he started an engineering degree at Polytechnique and quit (failed?) and then returned to McGill and entered a Masters program for Environmental Geography and finished all the course requirements but never completed his masters thesis and instead entered politics where he bided his time and kept his nose clean until the opportunity came and bingo prime minister …. no hardly successful at all ;-)

          • GW says:

            Failed at engineering. Transferred to Environmental Geography ??? What is that ? Basket Weaving for engineering dropouts ???

            LOSER!

          • Gail Combs says:

            Trudeau has a bachelor of arts degree in literature.

            Did substitute work at several local schools
            Starred in the two-part CBC Television miniseries
            Started studying engineering and quit.
            Started a master’s degree in environmental geography and quit.

            Mainly he did Advocacy aka promotion various causes using his father’s NAME.

            With out his NAME and pretty face he would be considered a flutter-by loser.

      • Colorado Wellington says:

        “the US is not faultless …”

        That’s an understatement. The US is not responsible for every mess around the world but our government’s Cuba blunders can fill whole libraries.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Robert Kennedy, JFK’s Sec of State had a KGB agent as an advisor.

          FROM Willing Accomplices: How KGB Covert Influence Agents Created Political Correctness and Destroyed America by Kent Clizbe

          Kent did not like Bobby, whom he calls bouncing Bobby. Like Trudeau Jr. he bounced from job to job, never sticking never doing anything useful and finally lands in politics.

          I have notice the strong dominant wealthy generally have real wimps for kids or end up disowning them. I used to live in Westchester county not far from the Clintons present home. It was an eye opener.

          … the KGB case officer, Georgi Bolshakov, represented himself to his target, Bobby Kennedy, as a “back-channel” conduit to the Kremlin. This is a common operational ruse, useful to convince otherwise wary targets that the information they share will go straight to the highest levels.

          This ruse is also useful against targets in influential positions, for example a kid Attorney General, the most trusted advisor to his brother, the President of the U.S. Against these targets, the ruse is expanded to include a ruse within a ruse—that the target is also receiving confidential details in an “information exchange.” After accepting a “personal relationship” with the Bolshakov, Bobby Kennedy opened up to the espionage professional’s developmental operation. Kennedy invited the KGB officer to his home, and met with him dozens of times. For a developmental operation, this is a rather accelerated schedule. It seems that the KGB was ready to err on the side of aggression, due to the need to implant influence messages with the young administration. In stark contrast to the dilettante know-it-all Bobby Kennedy, Bolshakov was an expert at his profession. He had joined the Soviet intelligence system in 1943, served throughout WW2 and followed that with a three year graduate level training program in intelligence operations. He developed excellent English language skills prior to his posting to Washington.

          The superbly successful development of the Attorney General by a man who was clearly Soviet intelligence would seem shocking by today’s counter-intelligence standards. At the time, evidently the Kennedys could do no wrong. Even today historians writing of this espionage operation give Bobby Kennedy an unwarranted benefit of the doubt.

          Andrew, discussing Bobby Kennedy’s use as an influence agent, says that Bobby seemed to be, “forgetting that he was dealing with an experienced intelligence professional who had been instructed to cultivate him,” And that “the president’s brother became convinced that ‘an authentic friendship grew’ between him and [the KGB officer].”

  4. gator69 says:

    This is what democracy looks like!

  5. gator69 says:

    And…

    This is what deomcracy looks like!

  6. hunter says:

    Excellent post. The same idea has been on my mind lately, not as well communicated.
    The democrats now have the peculiar institutions of unlimited immigration and climate extremism fueling them, among their others of unregulated abortion, war mongering, and racism. Any resistance or compromise on these topics sends them into fits of rage and sadly increasing violence.
    Will there be a Fort Sumter moment in California, the South Carolina of our age?

    • Louis Hooffstetter says:

      As a resident of Charleston, SC I hope not.

      But I wouldn’t be surprised…

      • Gail Combs says:

        Just stay out of large cities as much as you can. Many conservatives have built up relationships with their more rural brothers while Progressives flip them off.

    • Andy DC says:

      These are the people who will fight the new Civil War:

      1. The .ooo1% that are transgender and can’t figure out what bathroom to use.
      2. The .0o5% who can’t find someone to bake a cake for their gay wedding.
      3. The .1% that oppose vetting vetting people coming from terrorist nations.
      4. The .01% who believe it is OK to assassinate police officers.
      5. The .2% from the Climate Cult, who think Trump will destroy the planet.
      6. The .5% of the population that are fat assed Government bureaucrats, who believe their 6 figure salary is their lifetime entitlement for keeping a desk warm

      Does not exactly seem like a serious threat to the rest of us, certainly not in proportion to the amount of the noise they are making.

    • Kris Johanson says:

      With respect to California:
      1. This state wouldn’t last 3 weeks without Federal phony money,
      2. I suspect the California-secession thing is nothing but a big fundraiser, and
      3. California is already 3 separate states, politically & culturally. As long as we’re breaking-off California, let’s go the whole way and carve it up properly. And while we’re at it, reapportion Washington & Oregon correctly, too.

  7. Gail Combs says:

    Just posted this but it belongs here too:

    Soros has delusions of starting a ‘Color Revolution’ (purple) here in the USA. That was why Hillary and her best buds were all wearing purple.

    They forgot that map Tony is so fond of showing and the fact that if you block traffic into the cities you have major mayhem in three days as the cities start looking like Venezuela.

    Big problem for the Lefties is they have stirred up so much Cold Anger they will be met with the fate of the leftist in the Bloom County May 2, 1982 cartoon. (above)

    See the comments to the article of The Gateway Pundit:
    Black Lives Matter Protesters: “WE NEED TO START KILLING PEOPLE”; Calls For Trump’s ASSASSINATION! (VIDEO) Those are some ANGRY people. I have met some of them back in the boonies and they are NOT playing games.

    Also SEE:
    Is Soros On The Ropes?

    AND Soros has funded at least 5 well known revolutions.
    Top 5 Revolutions Backed by George Soros

    I sure hope Trump can contain the powder keg Congress and the MSM is busy trying to light off.

    SEE: definition of Pre-suasion.
    The Left is trying to get the Useful Idiot Cannon fodder convinced that Trump is not only an illegitimate President by saying he did not win the popular vote, but that he is actually staging an illegal Coup to take over the US government because he is replacing Obama’s plants.

    Here is one of the Pre-suasion articles.
    [TRUMP] – Trial Balloon for a Coup?
    Unfortunately, from the comments the Cannon Fodder has taken the bait.

    Black Lives Matters seems to have forgotten the little matter that the statue of Limitations is generally ~5 to 7 years…

  8. Thanks Tony – much to my shame I’d always assumed that the slave reliant states would be republican or more likely those like the BBC intentionally gave that impression and intentionally never told the British public the Democrats were the slavers.

    Indeed, now I come to think about it, as I’ve never read any books, I must have got my US history from the BBC.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      No worries, Mike. You would find that the typical product of American public schools and higher ed institutions doesn’t know it either. The “progressive” whitewash of history is a global phenomenon. Also, not much has changed about “white progressive” attitudes about blacks, as Ami Horowitz documents here:

      How white liberals really view black voters *)
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs

      ———-
      *) You may have noticed that I rarely slip to call American Leftists “liberals”. Just about the only thing liberal about that bunch is their liberal use of idiotic and prejudiced cliches.

    • Gail Combs says:

      MLK Was a republican, though you would never know it.

      Dineh D’Suisa’s movie Hillary’s America: The Secret History Of The Democratic Party does a good job of showing the real history. In my town there were NO ADS not even at the movie theatre, no posters on the wall, nothing. It was as close to censorship as you could get.

      Only word of mouth/internet allowed people to know the film was playing and it was only for a couple of days so you could not even spread the word once you saw it.

      This also does a very good job of chronicling Democrat Racism:
      http://www.maggiesnotebook.com/history-of-democrat-racism/

    • cdquarles says:

      Mike, to add a bit to your awakening, I will add this. After the deaths of Jefferson and Adams, the Jeffersonian Democratic-Republican party splintered in the face of John C. Calhoun’s (and others) desire to make the, now transitioning, indentured servitude into chattel slavery, led by the ‘natural’ aristocracy of certain Southerners. Note that, historically, slavery in the South (the North had already moved away from it), did not ‘discriminate’; for there were a number of prominent “Free Blacks” who owned plantations and slaves. As ‘Darwinism’ spread, as known here, these Free Blacks were dispossessed and the more populous South aggressively pursued expansion of the ‘Peculiar Institution’ as it was known.

      Andrew Jackson’s Democrat party became the dominant political expression of the ‘Natural White Slave-holding Aristocracy’, where he was also known as the Great Deceiver (the Trail of Tears, dispossessing the ‘Civilized Tribes’ and forcing their exile to the ‘new’ Indian Territory of Oklahoma). So yes, the current Democrat Party is the one that represented the interests of ‘white’ slave-holding aristocrats, who naturally despised the idea of ‘Created equal’ and individual liberty. The ‘opposition’ at the time was the Whig Party. The current Repubican (GOP) party did not exist yet. The slavers insisted that they had the right to expand slavery wherever they went and if a territory refused them, they asserted the right to have their fugitives returned by force in the non-slave territories. The Whigs tried to compromise with the aggressive slavers, but appeasement never works for long. The backlash against these aggressive actions splintered the Whigs and the Republican party arose as an abolitionist one. True enough, many of the newly formed Republicans agreed with the ‘Social Darwinists’ of their day (just like they did when the Progressives came along decades later). Thus the ‘Back to Africa’ movement, where people raised money to buy slaves and sent them to American colonies in western sub-Saharan Africa, such as Liberia, for example.

      The Civil War, aka the War of Northern Aggression, was inevitable. Lincoln sought to preserve the Union. He didn’t really care if it could be done while preserving slavery or not. That was not possible and his executive order known as the Emancipation Proclamation had no effect within the remaining Union. It was solely aimed at the rebelling South and said South’s economic interests.

      Though Lincoln didn’t seek abolition, his party did. After all, that’s what created it. The Republican party was the ‘civil rights’ party. It fought the Klan, it fought Jim Crow, it fought the lynchings. The Republican party passed the enabling Civil Rights laws pursuant to the 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and promoted civil rights laws throughout the ‘Progressive Era’, over the objections of Democrats. The famous Acts of 1964 and 65 would never have been passed, if the Democrats had their way (and they were the political majority in Congress at the time).

  9. Sunsettommy says:

    Posted this a while back about how the Deep south was run by democrats for 100 years,running over blacks.

    Democrat Party dominated the south for many decades

    “It is apparent that many Democrats fail to realize that the Democrat party itself dominated the south for over 80 years as shown in the below.The same southern states that originated the KKK,Jim Crow laws and other suppressive tactics that were very prominent in the southern states that were dominated by the Democrat PARTY.

    From Wikipedia is this entry about Jim Crow laws and that Liberal Democrat Woodrow Wilson pushed segregation with appointments of people into his administration who agree to keep blacks suppressed and separated in American society:”

    http://globalwarmingskeptics.info/thread-2058.html

  10. jokin says:

    It seems that there’s some question about the legitimacy of the Margaret Sanger picture. Does anyone know of its authenticity?

  11. Bill Moore says:

    The war wasn’t fought over slavery, but over the federal government’s insistence of increasing tariffs. Lincoln ran on the platform of instituting the Morrill Act hiking the amount goods were taxed coming in to the country. The southern states paid the majority of these taxes, (the feds main income at the time).
    Lincoln, before invading the south offered to guarantee the preservation of slavery in federal law, with provisions for fugitive returns from non slave states. If slavery was the reason to secede, this would have been the way to avoid war.

  12. CheshireRed says:

    Yep, but don’t think for one second these characteristics are unique to the US – they’re everywhere. Here in the UK I’ve been keeping a mental note of public protests and guess what? – the vast majority come courtesy of the political Left.
    Train strikes bringing the London tube and southern trains to a standstill – rail unions.
    Street protests & ‘anti-capitalists – always Social Worker, hard Left and so on.
    And only this week we’ve had squealing protest marches ‘against Trump’ across the metropolitan areas where students and thick liberal poseuers live. Again, always the Left, and so relentlessly thick they overlooked the hypocrisy of Arab / Muslim nations permanently banning Israeli’s.

    They’re in absolute turmoil though, because the last 20 years of their progressive bullshit is on the cusp of being chucked straight into the bin and they know it. I expect to see plenty more liberal snowflake crybaby pushback in the coming months, which is fine by me because it’s bloody hilarious.

    • Robertv says:

      They protest capitalism but without it most would not survive 1 week.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      Nope, this is certainly not unique to the US. The Left is reliable and dependable. There are only two rules one needs to know:

      1. You can always expect to see the Left swarming and seething somewhere.

      2. If you don’t see them somewhere it means they are swarming and seething somewhere else.

      … we were driving down Pennsylvania Avenue and encountered some or another noisy pinko demonstration.

      “How come,” I asked Andy, “whenever something upsets the Left, you see immediate marches and parades and rallies with signs already printed and rhyming slogans already composed, whereas whenever something upsets the Right, you see two members of the Young Americans for Freedom waving a six-inch American flag?”

      “We have jobs,” said Andy.

      From P. J. O`Rourke, Parliament of Whores

      Look at the nice professional uniforms of the German Blockupy protesters:

  13. Robertv says:

    If you want progressive’s funding to stop, kill their lifeline and abolish the Federal Reserve. Then they really go mad. If not slavery just changed how it looks like.

  14. Gail Combs says:

    PLEASE CALL YOUR SENATORS – NOW

    We need to get Jeff Sessions confirmed as Attorney General. And no he is NOT a racist and fought racism in Georgia.

    Snicker, the phone number list is WEBSITE TEMPORARILY UNAVAILABLE DUE TO MAINTENANCE.

    https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?OrderBy=state

    This one seems to be up and running:
    https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact/

    • Rud Istvan says:

      Sessions will get confirmed. He is out of committee. It is Devos who is in trouble. collins and Murkowsky have said the will vote no based on rocky hearing and unattributed quotes in written submissions. So only if all other repubs vote yes can Pence cast a tiebreaker to get her confirmed. in my opinion Trump could have done better for Education.

      • Gail Combs says:

        It is a good possibility that Devos is the red meat Trump tosses to the Communist wolves so the rest of the sleigh can coast by.

        The department of education is NOT in the Constitution. It only began operating on May 4, 1980 and the US education has gone straight into the sewer ever since. So just get rid of it!

  15. The other brad says:

    I’ve been in conversations about this and listened to others. The argument used against this is political parties change and what once were Democrats in the South are referred as Dixie-crats and are now Republicans.

    It’s absurd, of course, but that is what you get.

    For example.

    http://cjonline.com/blog/lucinda/2013-02-05/how-dixiecrats-became-republicans

    • Kris Johanson says:

      Yes, exactly. The argument is always, “Southern Christians simply became Republicans”. We’re supposed to conclude that Southern Christians = racists no matter which Party, and Northern Christians = broad minded liberals.

      This ignores the fact that the Parties, and Party leadership, has changed tremendously.

  16. scott allen says:

    Trump’s strategy is brilliant. The liberals have access to about 10 to 15 billion dollars a year to fight for various causes (pipeline, school choice, abortions, global warming, supreme court, gun control etc). But by issuing orders and various nomination all at the same time, this money that can be used by the liberals to fight Trump for each cause is reduced because there are so many causes all at once, i.e. it can’t be targeted to one or two things. It’s like the difference between a rife bullet and a shotgun

  17. JPinBalt says:

    Sorry Tony,
    The Sanger photo you caught is a photo-shopped fake, – is it something originally posted by Gavin Schmidt or Michael Mann?
    http://gizmodo.com/margaret-sanger-once-spoke-to-the-kkk-but-this-photo-o-1724547991
    http://www.snopes.com/margaret-sanger-kkk/
    abet she did speak to the KKK and thought/promoted legalized abortion and birth control as a form of eugenics to eliminate what she deemed inferior blacks from the gene pool. Planned Parenthood founder was no doubt a racist and Democratic presidential candidate HRC we just missed like a bullet admired her greatly.
    http://liberty247.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/hillary-clinton-margaret-sanger.png
    https://artneedssoul.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/margaret-sanger.jpg
    Keep up the good work Tony.

  18. AndyG55 says:

    You guys are gunna LOVE this

    I know us Aussies are laughing our a***s off.

    OMG is Turnbull a useless piece of swamp that needs draining !!

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/blogs/tim-blair/turnbull-trump-in-telephone-tiff/news-story/8b06ac629d93db098d7a169e30efe17d

  19. dp says:

    The Sanger photo on the platform is an obvious fake but her description of the actual meeting of the Democrat populated KKK as reported at Snopes is even more damning than that image can hope to be.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.