Before JFK History Was Rewritten

In the hours after JFK was shot, the White House medical officer said Kennedy was shot in the right temple. Motorcycle police raced up the grassy knoll of a park nearby. A Secret Service agent and Dallas policeman were killed away from the JFK shooting. And two days later Oswald was murdered while in police custody.

Anyone who cites these facts now is a “conspiracy theorist”

22 Nov 1963, Page 1 – Lansing State Journal at

What part of Kennedy Shot In Right Temple isn’t clear? Nearly every newspaper in the country reported the same thing.

Watch 1:00:00 to 1:04:00 of this video.

If you watch the whole video, you will understand exactly what happened that day, and the special ammo used for the kill shot.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Before JFK History Was Rewritten

  1. richard verney says:

    I would not put much weight to what was reported at the time. Witness reports are well known for being unreliable, and there was a state of confusion.

    The paper does state that the witness said: “It was a simple matter of a bullet right through the head” so this could be from back to front, or from front to back etc.

    I would much sooner pay heed to what was found at the autopsy.

    Obviously, there are many unanswered questions, and it is clear that the government has kept secret all the facts, and that is why many papers/files are only just released, and even now some are yet to be published. Whether we will ever know all the answers, or whether the true facts have already gone to the grave, only time will tell, but I suspect that all issues will never be satisfactorily explained beyond reasonable doubt.

    • tonyheller says:

      What part of Kennedy Shot In Right Temple isn’t clear?

      • richard verney says:

        No part of it. But that does not mean that it is correct.

        But it is what the paper said. The witness who is the named source of the article, a Dr Burkley, who did not witness the event, apparently said: “It was a simple matter of a bullet right through the head.” That statement is something different.

        The paper has embellished the statement. There may be good reason why. Perhaps the named witness also made the further remark, perhaps the paper spoke to someone else who made that remark, but the article in the paper does not clarify where it got its headline from, and the headline is not in quotes, and the paper states that “No other information was immediately available”.

        I think that you have some experience in the giving of expert evidence in Court cases,, I have have approximately 30 years of this, and an expert would be torn to shreds if he embellished that newspaper article and the quote therein into the headline that the paper ran with.

        I think that we can all agree that there is simply a lot of unanswered questions.

        • tonyheller says:

          Always fascinating watching people clinging to the obviously incorrect propaganda they were raised with.
          The video makes it very clear where the kill shot came from.

          The assassin explains everything that went on in great detail in this video.

          • richard verney says:

            I was not raised with any propaganda. It was before my time, and I am from the other side of the pond.

            I am merely commenting upon the Newspaper article, and I note that you do not join issue with what I said about the newspaper article. As interesting as it may be, I do not have time to watch a 3 hour video, on something that there is no prospect of putting right. If more people were involved than Oswald, they have got away with it. That is water under the bridge, and the swamp still needs draining.

            I too am concerned about the deep state, and I too am concerned by how it and MSM are handling Trump (and Brexit on my side of the pond). These are very worrying times for democracy and freedom.

    • sunsettommy says:

      TWO Autopsies and subsequent investigations made clear he was shot in the BACK of the head and neck.

      This one the Kennedy Family pushed,that concludes he was shot in the head and through the neck from BEHIND:

      “The gunshot wound in the back

      The Bethesda autopsy physicians attempted to probe the bullet hole in the base of Kennedy’s neck above the scapula, but were unsuccessful as it passed through neck strap muscle. They did not perform a full dissection or persist in tracking, as throughout the autopsy, they were unaware of the exit wound, at the front of the throat. Emergency room physicians had obscured it when they performed the tracheotomy.
      At Bethesda, the autopsy report of the president, Warren Exhibit CE 387[9] described the back wound as being oval, 6 by 4 millimetres (0.24 in × 0.16 in), and located “above the upper border of the scapula” (shoulder blade) at a location 14 centimetres (5.5 in) from the tip of the right acromion process, and 14 centimetres (5.5 in) below the right mastoid process (the bony prominence behind the ear).
      The concluding page of the Bethesda autopsy report,[9] states: “The other missile [the bullet to the back] entered the right superior posterior thorax above the scapula, and traversed the soft tissues of the supra-scapular and the supra-clavicular portions of the base of the right side of the neck.”
      The report also reported contusion (bruise) of the apex (top tip) of the right lung in the region where it rises above the clavicle, and noted that although the apex of the right lung and the parietal pleural membrane over it had been bruised, they were not penetrated, indicating passage of a missile close to them, but above them.
      The report noted that the thoracic cavity was not penetrated.
      This missile produced contusions of the right apical parietal pleura and of the apical portion of the right upper lobe of the lung. The missile contused the strap muscles of the right side of the neck, damaged the trachea, and made its exit through the anterior surface of the neck.
      The single bullet of the Warren Commission Report places a bullet wound at the sixth cervical vertebra (C6) of the vertebral column, which is consistent with 5.5 inches (14 cm) below the ear. The Warren Report itself does not conclude bullet entry at the sixth cervical vertebra, but this conclusion was made in a 1979 report on the Kennedy assassination by the HSCA, which noted a defect in the C6 vertebra in the Bethesda X-rays, which the Bethesda autopsy physicians had missed, and did not note. The X-rays were taken by Commander John H. Ebersole, Medical Corps, US Navy.

      Even without this information, the original Bethesda autopsy report, included in the Warren Commission report, concluded that this bullet had passed entirely through the president’s neck, from a level over the top of the scapula and lung (and the parietal pleura over the top of the lung), and through the lower throat.”


      The 1968 Ramsey Report

      “SUMMARY: Examination of the clothing and of the photographs and X- rays taken at autopsy reveal that President Kennedy was struck by two bullets fired from above and behind him, one of which traversed the base of the neck on the right side without striking bone and the other of which entered the skull from behind and exploded its right side. The photographs and X-rays discussed herein support the above-quoted portions of the original Autopsy Report and the above-quoted medical conclusions of the Warren Commission Report.”


      The Rockefeller commission 1975,

      “in the assassination of President Kennedy placed much stress upon the movements of the President’s body associated with the head wound that killed the President.”

      The Commission examined the Zapruder, Muchmore, and Nix films; the 1963 autopsy report, the autopsy photographs and X-rays, President Kennedy’s clothing and back brace, the bullet and bullet fragments recovered, the 1968 Clark Panel report, and other materials. The five panel members came to the unanimous conclusion that President Kennedy was struck by only two bullets, both of which were fired from the rear, including one that struck the back of the head. Three of the physicians reported that the backward and leftward motion of the President’s upper body following the head shot was caused by a “violent straightening and stiffening of the entire body as a result of a seizure-like neuromuscular reaction to major damage inflicted to nerve centers in the brain.”

      The report added that there was “no evidence to support the claim that President Kennedy was struck by a bullet fired from either the grassy knoll or any other position to his front, right front, or right side … No witness who urged the view [before the Rockefeller Commission] that the Zapruder film and other motion picture films proved that President Kennedy was struck by a bullet fired from his right front was shown to possess any professional or other special qualifications on the subject.”[14]”


      HSCA analysis (1979)

      “The pathology panel concluded that President Kennedy was struck by only two bullets, each of which entered from the rear. The panel further concluded that the President was struck by “one bullet that entered in the upper right of the back and exited from the front of the throat, and one bullet that entered in the right rear of the head near the cowlick area and exited from the right side of the head, toward the front” saying that “this second bullet caused a massive wound to the President’s head upon exit.” The panel concluded that there was no medical evidence that the President was struck by a bullet entering the front of the head and the possibility that a bullet could have struck him, and yet left no evidence has been extremely remote.

      Because this conclusion appeared to be inconsistent with the backward motion of the President’s head in the Zapruder film, the committee consulted a wound ballistics expert to determine what relationship, if any, exists between the direction from which a bullet strikes the head and subsequent head movement. The expert concluded that nerve damage from a bullet entering the President’s head could have caused his back muscles to tighten which, in turn, could have forced his head to move toward the rear. He demonstrated the phenomenon in a filmed experiment which involved the shooting of goats. Thus, the committee determined that the rearward movement of the President’s head would not be fundamentally inconsistent with a bullet striking from the rear.[16]”

      • tonyheller says:

        He was also shot in the back. But the kill shot came from the right front. How did a shot fired down from the fifth floor of a building exit near the top of his head?

        Blog theme :

        Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts”
        – Richard Feynman”

        97% of “Experts say” LOL The police rushed up the grassy knoll, because they heard and/or saw a gunshot coming from there.

  2. kyle_fouro says:

    What were the other two deaths about? I had no clue this even happened until I read the post.

    • richard verney says:

      I am not an expert on this, but I seem to recall that it is said that the policeman was shot by Oswald as Oswald tried to get away, and/or to avoid arrest. No doubt others will be able to answer your question.

  3. Brad says:

    Why does the White House have/need a medical examiner?

  4. CO2isLife says:

    The one piece of evidence is that is ignored is that there is a bullet hole in the window, and a bullet hit the metal right above the rearview mirror. The claim was that they existed before the shooting, but that would prove that this isn’t the first time it was attempted. Anyway, google JFK windshield bullethole. The facts are the bullet count is off. The other piece of evidence is that the bullets that hit the body pass through undamaged and are solid point bullets, the headshot is clearly a hollowpoint, and explodes. Jackie also gets on the rear trunk to gather the brains, further evidence the entry wound was in the front and the exit the back of the head. Lastly, Dulles, the CIA Chief JFK fired, was put in charge of the investigation.

    • arn says:

      How big is the chance that someone shoots holes into a president-car,
      noone talks about ,noone writes about and noone cares to fix the bullet holes(especially the window)
      I guess 0% or less.
      (the car either get fixed or replaced)

      And how big is a chance that someone shoots at the presidents car,
      without a drastic increase in security measures as result of the shooting?
      One can be sure that many many more policemen would have been there,that the presidents car would no longer be a cabriollet but a closed car with bullet proof windows and bullet proof everything.

      Hitting a moving target is hard, the head of someone almost impossible.
      Going for the head(incl. hollow point bullet)
      was that he has to die 100%.
      That only works when you sit/stay in front/back of the moving direction
      and the moving direction is straight away/towards you,so that the head is not/barely moving when you shot.

      As always in history- as soon as something happens and too many coincidences/miracles occure to make this things happen
      than it was staged
      ((even a single very unusual coincidence should make someone start ask questions,but several of them= official story is BS,and we have tons of questionable stuff going on.
      To many whitnesses who died too soon,a useless gun,a magic bullet,the killers visits cinema after the shooting,the killer being killed))

      The official story about jfk’s killing is as true as islam is the religion of peace((and though it is very easy to prove that the ladder has nothing to do with peace even if you ignore all the terror attacks etc(just find out what islam means),most people will parrot this BS.
      Now-how can someone figure out that the official JFK story is pure fiction when he can not figure out that islam is not the religion of peace,though there is overwhelming evidence and proof that it is not?

      Well he can’t:
      He was conditioned/programmed to follow certain patterns:

      JFK official story is a lie=People will think i’m a tinfoil,flat earth loonatic.A conspiracy theorist.Someone who believe in aliens((though the jfk killing has absolutely nothing to do with tin foils,aliens,flat earth etc)

      Islam is not religion of peace=People will think i’m an intolerant ,bigot
      Nazi((Though islam is the goldstandard of intolerance,bigotry and muslims were biggest friends of nazis during ww2 and still admire Hitler))

      • menicholas says:

        IMO, you are right on the money Arn.
        The official story is a web of lies.
        If any one can, or should be able to, understand that a whole lot of very important people lying about something very important is not only possible, but it happens all the time, it ought to be climate realists.
        I see some people who are rightly skeptical of CAGW and know exactly how big and wide the fraud is, somehow cannot find room to have doubts about the JFK assassination because of “official reports”.
        We know full well that reports can be and sometimes are whitewashes, and investigations can and sometimes are made to shut up skeptics, rather than find the truth.
        The official story is a miles-high load of horse shit.
        I have watched many many dozens if not hundreds of hours of shows, documentaries, films, and motion pictures, plus read dozens of books, and have watched and read most of the material not once but several times over.
        I actually want to believe Oswald acted alone…but he did not, or at the very least, there is much more to the story if he did.
        Not only the murder itself, but the multiple cover-ups, continuing to this day, are a black stain on the honor of our country…if there is any honor at all left.

        • menicholas says:

          I take that last part back…I do believe the USA is an honorable country…with some very dishonorable people running around within it.

    • Latitude says:

      “Jackie also gets on the rear trunk to gather the brains,”…
      Extremely unlikely…..she’s looking up
      You would be looking down to pick something up

      • menicholas says:

        She definitely went after a piece of his head…she grabs it and goes back to her seat.
        It is not unlikely, although it is nonsensical, but I do not expect a woman who just watched her husbands head explode inches from her face would act 100% rationally.
        But the main thing is…there is a film of her doing it. She was not looking up…she was crawling back with her head facing down.

  5. Tom O says:

    I see a lot of comments were removed, including mine. Interesting.

  6. RW says:

    In that video, he describes the weapon he claims he used. Pretty interesting. Basically a scoped ‘pistol’ (truncated rifle barrel). He claims he got the kill shot on JFK from the grassy knoll. Later on though, I think he does say something about how the bullet he used was an ordinary .22. So if it’s an incindiary, then he doesn’t know it is. If he’s correct about the bullet, then the idea about an incindiary is weakened. The light spot is definitely odd and not easily explainable…

    • I do not know what the bright spot is. A forensic officer looked at the “confession” and told me fake confessions flood in whenever a celebrity is victimized. But the neck wound would have had to be at a greater angle to the horizontal if from 6 stories up.

  7. Michael says:

    I have visited the Grassy Knoll and the Book Depository.
    In the latter, if you stand where Oswald was alleged to be the assassin, it seems implausible because of the extreme angle he would have needed to shoot – think standing on tip toe and shooting down at an angle of 45%.
    Alternatively, there is a perfect spot just behind the Grassy Knoll and close to the escape route where an assassin would have a clear shot, within 50 yards.
    This is where Kennedy was shot in the right temple. Other shooters may well have been involved, including Oswald. But he was just a patsy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.