Finally – Proof That Global Warming Is Man Made

Scientists have searched for years for proof that global warming is man-made, but the evidence is right under their noses on the NASA web site.  Global warming is man-made, by these two people.

In the year 2000, NASA showed earth warming at less than 0.4C per century. But by 2017, they had more than doubled the pre-2000 warming rate to more than 0.8C per century.

This was accomplished through an impressive hockey stick of data tampering, where years before 1970 are progressively cooled, and years after 1970 are progressively warmed.

Spreadsheet   Data

Nothing at all suspicious about climate modelers tampering with data to make it match their failed theories.

Note that after 1998, the observations are likely to be below the simulated values, indicating that the simulation as a whole are predicting too much warming.

Climate Analysis | Remote Sensing Systems

And then pressuring other climate scientists to also tamper with their data and bring it into compliance.

Climate Mafia At Work | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

The good news is that the climate mafia is completely predictable.

“I expect there will soon be a revised TLT product from RSS which shows enhanced warming, too.

Here’s what I’m predicting:

1) neither John Christy nor I will be asked to review the paper

2) it will quickly sail through peer review (our UAH V6 paper is still not in print nearly 1 year after submission)

3) it will have many authors, including climate model people and the usual model pundits (e.g. Santer), which will supposedly lend legitimacy to the new data adjustments.

Let’s see how many of my 3 predictions come true.


Roy Spencer’s Prediction | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

As I predicted more than three years ago.


This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

43 Responses to Finally – Proof That Global Warming Is Man Made

  1. Andy DC says:

    The climate models are God given and infallible. Any actual temperature records that deviates from Scripture are the work of the Devil!

  2. gregole says:

    Meanwhile in the real world:
    Arctic is fine / Polar bears are fine
    Antarctic is fine / Penguins are fine
    Sea-Level rise same as it always was / Miami experiencing a building boom
    Temperatures sometimes up, sometimes down / Maricopa County (Phoenix, Az) fastest growing county in the US.

    Global Warming is a non-problem and is entirely M@nn-Made by a small cabal of well-connected charlatans. The biggest scientific fraud in history.

    • gregole says:

      And did I mention the finest sales and marketing job in history? Convincing people that:

      Mild, warm weather is a disaster for humanity and nature
      Desolate nowhere Arctic and Antarctic wastelands are bellwethers for all earth
      CO2, the key to life on the planet, is a pollutant
      Massive, invasive, utterly incompetent government action is the only solution

      Greatest con-job in history.

      • steve case says:

        … did I mention the finest sales and marketing job in history? Convincing people that:

        Never under estimate the power of cleverly worded nonsense.

      • Nathan Simon says:

        “Greatest con-job in history.”

        I could debate you all day but I believe the greatest con-job is public nutrition pushed the government. 1 in 3 Americans are diabetic or pre-diabetic resulting in the greatest human experiment in the history of mankind. Pushed by the same types of “scientists” who hawk AGW, bullies with flawed research essentially.

    • Alan Tomalty says:

      The biggest fraud in history

  3. Brian D says:

    When I found this NOAA 20th century V2 temp reconstruction for the US, and posted it here a few days ago, it disappeared from the server within 48 hours. Truth hurts.

  4. steve case says:

    I just redid my chart showing the changes made to LOTI, GISSTEMP’s Land Ocean Temperature Index from 2002 to 2018. It shows that all the changes since 1970 average out to be positive and most of the changes prior to that date have lowered global temperature. Anybody with some curiosity and a little perseverance can duplicate the findings on this graph:

  5. Gerald Machnee says:

    Can you explain this so terak can undrestand.

  6. Mollington Bannister says:

    Are any justifications given for the alterations in data ? If so, in the interests of balance, where can I find them ?

    • Gator says:

      “It was always a business where you had to have an edge, and the little guy never got a break. The institutions controlled everything,”

      “I was always able to rationalize it…”

      “Does anybody want to hear that I had a successful business and did all these wonderful things for the industry? And got all these awards? And so did my family? I did all of this during the legitimate years. No. You don’t read any of that.”

      “it’s unbelievable no one has any criminal convictions–the whole new regulatory reform is a joke. The whole government is a Ponzi scheme.”

  7. JL says:

    I may be missing something, but the header on the second graph says “changes in NASA GISS global temperature from 2000 to 2017”, but the graph itself shows 1875 to 2000

  8. Mark Pawelek says:

    Their climate models serve another, very useful, function. Models enable them to hide their scientific assumptions, equations, etc. in incomprehensible computer code. Nowhere did they ever write down exactly what all those assumptions and equations are. E.g. They give no scientific definition for the greenhouse gas effect. Because their arguments are hidden, they are beyond criticism. We can’t really be sure what their argument is. Especially for their model ‘parameterizations’, where they substitute fairly arbitrary numbers for equations (because they don’t actually know what equation to use!). The effects of these parameterizations account for most of the warming in their models. All the while, pretending that their models are simulations using laws of physics to show how climate behaves. This is how very clever people do fraud.

    • Mark Pawelek says:

      At this point, because I’m describing how their fraud works, an alarmist will say:

      “What a devious plan, worthy of a Moriaty. How many people were involved in this massive conspiracy?”

      No, there’s no necessary conspiracy involved here. The climate scammers simply followed the lines of least resistance offered by accepted science practice and publishing standards. They took the paths open to them which enabled their scientific fraud. Bad science enabled this, not conspiracy.

      • Gator says:

        Religion is not a conspiracy. When like minded people congregate with their common beliefs, there is no need for a secret plan. These people believe, or at least want to believe, that man’s sins against nature are the root of all evil, and must be stopped at all costs to avoid nature’s ultimate judgement. Their models simply reflect this deep belief, the same way theologians’ writings defend their religion of choice. Freedom of religion is awesome! But when did these lefties forget their hatred of state sponsored religion?

        • Disillusioned says:

          “…when did these lefties forget their hatred of state sponsored religion?”

          The inconsistencies of the left are so numerous, a weak moral compass is best to be a good leftist. One must be willing to change (and without questioning, accept the change) with the speed of the next [fake] news cycle.

        • Mark Pawelek says:

          I can’t call climate fear a religion. It became ‘groupthink’. Before that, it was a ’cause’. I don’t think it’s about “man’s sins against nature”. Because: look at their own “sins against nature”; wind-farms, solar farms, renewables, worst of all: bio-energies. They usually have no problem trashing nature. Most are not greens. They often share some ideas with greens. For example: their lack of faith in humanity, their obsessions over scarcity. A mindset of limits. E.g. 1) There’s only so much clean atmosphere and now we’ve used it all up. E.g. 2) We must use renewables. Ideans: (1) and (2) are just wrong. CO2 is good for atmosphere. Renewables are bad for people and the environment.

          • Gator says:

            You just have not studied it enough…

            Man-made global warming is an earth-worshiping religion. The essential feature of any religion is that its pronouncements are to be accepted on faith, as opposed to hard evidence. And as with most religions, it is susceptible to the earthly temptations of money, power, politics, arrogance, and deceit.

            Global warmists have an unshakable faith that man-made carbon emissions will produce a hotter climate, causing natural disasters. Their insistence that we can be absolutely certain that this will come to pass is based not on science, but on faith.

            All the trappings of religion are here:

            • Original sin: Mankind is responsible for the prophesied disasters, especially those of us who live in suburbs and drive our SUVs to strip malls and chain restaurants.

            • The need for atonement and repentance: We must impose a carbon tax or cap-and-trade system, which will raise the cost of everything and stunt economic growth.

            • Rituals: We must observe Earth Day, and we must recycle.

            • Indulgences: Private jet-fliers like Al Gore and sitcom heiress Laurie David can buy carbon offsets to compensate for their carbon-emitting sins.

            • Prophecy and faith in things unseen: Advocates say we must act now before it is too late.


          • Johansen says:

            Where’s your Climate Apostles Creed, Gator?

          • Gator says:

            The Anthropocene Creed

            I believe in CO2, the Gas Almighty,
            Creator of Warming on Earth.
            I believe in Climate Models, the only guides, our Lords.
            Which are conceived by the Navier-Stokes,
            Born to make climate scary
            Suffered under climate skeptics
            Were crucified by emails, dead and buried;
            They descended into Hell;
            On the Third Assessment Report they rose again from the dead;
            They ascended into policy heaven
            And sitteth on the right hand of the Administrator Almighty;
            From thence they shall come to judge the emitters and the dead.
            I believe in the Hot Spot;
            The Holy Scientific Consensus;
            The Communion of Experts;
            The forgiveness of emissions;
            The resurrection of Gaia;
            And the Gas Everlasting.

          • Gator says:

            The Alarmist’s Creed:

            I believe in AGW, the Mother of all apocalypse, destroyer of heaven and earth.

            I believe in Al Gore, his only Movie, ‘An Inconvenient truth’, which was conceived by the Holy Alarmists, born of the fascist left, suffered under scrutiny, was panned, died, and was buried, it descended to the discount aisle. On an absurd day it rose again; it ascended into legend, it is in the DVD players of the faithful, and it will come to judge the deniers, and the evil oil companies.

            I believe in the Unholy molecule, the holy IPCC Church, the communion of grantologists, the forgiveness of carbon, the resurrection of communism, and the lie everlasting.


          • Colorado Wellington says:

            I for one am very optimistic about the ecumenical potential of this spiritual awakening. When both ISIS and the Pope elevated carbon dioxide to its almighty position they gave mankind a unique opportunity to drop sectarian differences and unite with wiccans in the worship of single divinity.

  9. Johansen says:

    Best laugh I’ve had all week! Real therapy!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *