Settled Science About England’s Future Climate

The UK will have a snow-free, Siberian, Mediterranean, permanent drought, permanent flooded, hot, cold climate.

Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past – Environment – The Independent

Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us | Environment | The Guardian

BBC NEWS | UK | Climate may turn UK Mediterranean

Ice-free Arctic in two years heralds methane catastrophe – scientist | Environment | The Guardian

Drought may be new norm for UK, says environment secretary | Environment | The Guardian

One year on from the floods: businesses tell how they picked up the pieces | Guardian Small Business Network | The Guardian

If you don’t agree with all this, you are a racist.

Climate Deniers Are More Likely to Be Racist. Why? | Sierra Club

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Settled Science About England’s Future Climate

  1. Josh says:

    What about the leftists rascists happy at the Asian people misery? When Greenland, Siberia,Canadian Archipaelago are cold, no sound from them!
    Liberal logic

    • MGJ says:

      It’s an example of the classic leftist circular argument.

      Define ‘racist’ as someone with all the characteristics you don’t like about the target group then…hey presto! See, they’re all racists!

  2. Josh says:

    Racism. Only the White Man land of the Arctic matter. Northern Europe = Arctic. Hence, Arctic is catastrophically warming.
    Libtards

  3. John F. Hultquist says:

    Do I get some sort of compensation (>$100) if I click on the link to the Sierra Club magazine?
    No!
    I’ll pass then.

    The rest of these things are silly.

    The writers seem not to know about Earth’s tilt, rotation, and revolution about the Sun. Climate(s) will not change with a small change in temperature. To grasp how small 1/2 to 2 degrees change is, one needs to use the Kelvin Scale.
    If we could pick up the UK and move it beside Sicily, then it would get a Mediterranean style climate.

  4. Chris says:

    And they wonder why we wouldn’t believe these “Climate Scientists.”

  5. Andy DC says:

    After a hot first half of July over the eastern 2/3 of the US, the 2nd half was below normal, thus most places will end up within a degree or so of normal for the month. Another shockingly normal summer and another huge corn/soybean crop on the way.

    The one exception was in parts of Texas and Oklahoma, where it stayed hot and dry for most of the month.

    • Winnipeg boy says:

      Exactly!
      Is the Koppen Line moving?
      No?
      Then the climate is not changing.
      Plants don’t care about your stupid carbon tax. They just thrive in a higher CO2 atmosphere.

  6. Anon says:

    Tony: Wow Wow Wow!

    Those contradictory England headlines are truly incredible. I don’t know if you have more, of other areas, but a short video of contradictions like that would have a good chance of going viral. The deception is absolutely shocking. One would have to be stupid to keep reading those publications after that. :(

    • David M. says:

      OW! OW! OW!

      That selection of articles caused anthropogenic mental whiplash. In 2004, The Guardian warned the UK will soon resemble Siberia. In 2005, the BBC warned the UK will soon have a Mediterranean climate. Rinse and repeat in flood years, but not during droughts. Are these quickly reversed forecasts the results of settled science?

  7. gregole says:

    Those august publications would be:

    The Independent
    Guardian
    BBC
    Guardian
    Guardian
    Guardian
    Sierra Club

    Stuff made up whole cloth masquerading as actual news. And the torrential lying continues unabated. It’s a public menace.

    • ЯΞ√ΩLUT↑☼N says:

      What’s worse is the creeping menace of global Islamification, and not a peep about it from any of them.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      True, and let’s not forget various institutions and governmental departments including top officials feeding this bullshit to the “media” thus making it “newsworthy”, with a feedback loop back to the same governments and institutions.

      It’s a large system for the continuous production, circulation and emanation of bullshit.

      —————
      (I know this is an older post)

  8. Disillusioned says:

    Never question settled science. Especially government-sanctioned settled science with that special sauce in it we call, “climate change.” With that special sauce added, for today’s scientist, the world is your oyster.

  9. Louis Hooffstetter says:

    Also from Sierra Club magazine, here’s the latest special sauce the climate witch doctors are pushing:
    https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/virtual-reality-secret-sauce-for-climate-action

    It’s basically climate porn “for the children”.

  10. Robert Forest says:

    Concerning the article on climate deniers being racist, are you sure this isn’t from the Onion? This has to be a joke. The virtual reality article is a little more believable, and a lot more frightening. Another Inconvenient truth to show the children in school.
    During my elementary school experience, we had drills to teach us to duck below the windows and under the desks when the Russians nuked us. We were all shown the films of buildings being swept away by the blast. History repeats, a slicker form of the old technique. You know the Russians have pointy teeth and don’t believe in climate change.

    • cdquarles says:

      He he. I remember those, only we were sent to the bomb shelter. I was driving in town a few days ago. The old city hall building still has the bomb shelter sign. It is now quite faded, being some 50 years old; but still. Oh, said town had a munitions plant in it at the time, so jokes about being on the target list were taken somewhat seriously.

  11. Steve N says:

    Say anything you want!

    There appears to me no accountability for journalists anymore. Gone are the days when facts were checked, re-checked and the checked again. It now doesn’t matter what is written as long as it’s headline grabbing, that’s all that matters.

    Although no scientist should be subject to legal action for the scientific view, it’s getting to the point were journalists should be as they have lost their ethical compass and simply don’t give a dam anymore, as long as they get paid.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.