First Female President

6 Responses to First Female President

1. Richard E Fritz says:

   January 27, 2025 at 1:51 pm

   the LEFTOIDS will never end this stupid SHIP

   Reply
2. Trevor says:

   January 27, 2025 at 2:07 pm

   Leftists work very hard to be obtuse and exhibit no common sense. It is in their passive aggressive DNA.

   Reply
3. arn says:

   January 27, 2025 at 2:35 pm

   It is interesting how they are using more and more minorities
   to push the worst of their crap.

   And now a Muslima who absolutely does not believe a tiny peace of this wokecrap
   (despite being 100% Sodom&Gomorha based = London,New York).

   And the lowest of its lows is not even that she never had any problems all the years with the very vague woke definition that leaves room for every interpretation one wants ,so vague that noone actually knows what gender 4,15 or 27 is or how many genders there are(=every American president has been female) ;
   but all of a sudden she is nitpicking on a nano level ,bitching about something that is way more accurate than any Muslim country has to offer.

   And her headline was stolen from?
   Trump.
   As she ripped it off from Trumps joke that democrats are so woke that Chuck Schumer may become Americas first female president if Kamala loses the election.

   And I bet she can not be bothered to tell us the difference between grooming
   and child rape and why the Media does not use the 2nd term instead of the first one
   for the sake of accuracy.

   Reply
4. Russell Cook says:

   January 27, 2025 at 4:09 pm

   Well, give the Graunidad newspaper credit for creating a clickbait headline so tempting that even I could not resist my curiosity to find out what on Earth could possibly justify it. The subhead “The confusing and vague executive order underscores how complex sex is and why it’s hard to reduce it into a neat binary,” of course, is pure lunacy. The actual reasoning behind their speculation is just plain stupid, about esoteric hairsplitting of the terms “moment of conception” and what all of us look like as just a few startup cells. Their line of reasoning makes us all females, and that same line of reasoning would make every one of us immigrants from Africa if you carry that idea clean back to its origins.

   The old adage about “don’t stand in the way of someone bent on committing political suicide” applies here. How many more subscribers – of the few remaining right now – can they afford to lose by coming up with trash like this before they have none left?

   Reply
   • arn says:

     January 27, 2025 at 4:27 pm

     The funniest thing about this is
     that not a single of these things that are nowadays called “problematic”, “confusing” or whatever term they use instead of politically incorrect,
     was problematic or confusing in the USA and the west before Obama appeared
     and never ever has been a thing in history of mankind in the rest of the world until now.
     And Trumps simple return to preObama normality is here being sold
     as something a weird;
     by a woman who knows what100% well ,as result of her cultural background, that she is trying to bullshit her readers.

     Reply
5. conrad ziefle says:

   January 28, 2025 at 1:35 am

   The early movers are out there trying to see if anyone will rally to their drum. This poor woman has poor reading comprehension, if she can worm that conclusion out of Trump’s executive order. Maybe a deficiency of logic as well.

   Reply