Michael Mann promised to stop contaminating Twitter with his propaganda after January 20, but he seems to be unable to keep his promises.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- Mike Haseler (Scottish Sceptic) on Back To The Future
- Tel on Back To The Future
- arn on Back To The Future
- Walter on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Brodirt on Back To The Future
The “celebrated” Michael Mann was featured on Communist Nutcase Network and other avenues of disinformation to explain why California wildfires were the result “CO2 in the air.” The relation between “CO2 in the air” and “Santa Ana Winds” was not discussed, presumably because there is no relation.
Mann has not been interviewed (yet) to explain the relation between “CO2 in the air” and “snow throughout the East Coast of the USA.” It might be a stretch to find a relation, but I have confidence in his ability to come up with one
Swines under Siege.
Spamming the Quote of the day.
Hannity:” If I don’t hurry up your staff is gonna kill me .”
Trump: ” I’m not Obama”
I just think it is arrogant of him to think that he and his buddy have a definitive view on science, when many top scientists are saying that the current problem with science is the lack of rigor throughout the scientific community, and tokenism, particularly in regard to things somewhat akin to religious doctrine. His topic is timely, but I bet he argues backwards in support of Science Religion, not science, the search for truth.
‘My social media team’
Wut?
our injudicious judiciary makes frauds like Mann possible – not to speak of the unspeakable academic frauds who make him a ‘professor’ of the religion of scientism.