I am absolutely certain that three weeks from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that … this was the moment when the summer 2014 melt of the Arctic began to slow (for a week or two.)
– Me July 6, 2014
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- MLH on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
The anomalies of “cryosphere today” for the late 70’s, 80’s and 90’s up to 1995 are very similar, with no evident trend downward.
JAXA analysis is notoriously warmist.
Independently of what the warmists say, we could be back to 2005-06 levels this year… all we need is a little lower level of solar radiations.
If the radiations stabilize at the levels of last month or below, I have no doubt that at some point of the 2nd semester (probably at the end of the year) the Arctic ice will be back to average or above.
Right now, I’d be very glad to see the final melt in September just repeating the good result of 2013.
Not that I disagree in any way but when you say “back to the average” what is the average and over what time. We do not have an average as I understand things,
I didn’t say any such thing.
I meant, the 1979-2008 mean value, as in the cryosphere graph,
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.anomaly.arctic.png
The ice should reach the mean at the end of the year.
Welllllllll, yes, except for the magic finger on the scale. My prediction is that even at levels exceeding the 70’s, official publications will pronounce them to be less.
35+% of the temps are fake, why should they stop there?
Where is Reggie? It’s heading for perfect kayak and canoe season.
In July 2012, Alarmists were up in arms about the Petermann glacier calving.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petermann_Glacier
Today it is choked with sea ice and the glacier is growing again.
http://www.arctic.io/explorer/
Australia’s carbon taxscam is so powerful, it freezes Greenland as well as Antarctica.
When do you think they’ll get around to putting in a new dashed line for the 2010’s average?
I think they’ve already computed it, and didn’t like the results. It probably shows current values close to (or above) that “average” line.
“Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age.”
Dr. Richard Lindzen. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Professor of Atmospheric Science