In 1951, scientists blamed shrinking glaciers, disappearing lakes, and frightened birds – on increased solar output. The Great Salt Lake lost half of its volume between 1850 and 1950.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Gordon Vigurs on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Ed on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Walter on Ellen Flees To The UK
- conrad ziefle on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- conrad ziefle on Ellen Flees To The UK
Not all scientists, just political hack ones.
Here is the water level for the Great Salt Lake over the last 165 years.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/files/2014/08/pi39-06.gif
Do you see that strong correlation with CO2 levels? Me neither.
Lake Tulare in California was the biggest freshwater lake in the US not counting the Great Lakes. Bigger than Lake Champlain.
Between 1850 and 1910 it lost 100% of its volume. Yes, I said 100%
Google THAT one.
Ulysses Grant’s and Teddy Roosevelt’s horses caused this.
RTF
But Svalgaard says that is simply not true.
L.S. works for Stanford Univ, home of John Holdren, Obama’s Science Czar.s co-author, Paul Ehrlich.
.This is the newest: http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/08/its-sun_9.html
Part of the wrangling at Jo Nova’s:
http://joannenova.com.au/2014/07/more-strange-adventures-in-tsi-data-the-miracle-of-900-fabricated-fraudulent-days/
From a couple years ago Dr. Judith Curry’s comments: http://judithcurry.com/2012/02/09/aq/
My opinion (SWAG) is L.S. has an agenda that coincides with that of the UN.
A “solar expert” should know something about photons, especially as applied to solar flux. But, not at WUWT….
When I first visited WUWT, he and Robert Bateman talked like the Mayan Indians knew something special with the calendar. Surprised
LS does believe in changes in the conditions of the stratosphere, but not a solar-volcanic link. Personally, I think there is a bit of a link, but that’s not all there is to it… Cosmic dust… it might not stay in the stratosphere quite as long as volcanic, but put increases of the two together. Or decreases of the two together can explain warmings.
See: http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/around-the-world-in-4-days-nasa-tracks-chelyabinsk-meteor-plume/#.UuvL9ShmWGd
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtJzn8A725w&sns=em
But then, 2012 was hot, now it’s not. The planet’s air conditioning system is now cooling down. Overall the net energy of the oceans is now down. The Antarctic is freezing over at a record rate. The Arctic is not warming and melting. More ice covering oceans is less energy getting in. No extra energy in the deep oceans. Hmmm
Then there could have been a change in how Earth orbited the sun during the LIA. I’m not a big fan, but it is a possibility.
Ah, the good old days in the ’50s – when the birds were merely frightened.
Now they’re chopped to bits, mauled and maimed midair by wind turbines and incinerated by solar. All to save the planet doncha know…