Two years ago, the Guardian announced that the Hudson Bay Polar Bear population was about to collapse.
Polar bear numbers in Hudson Bay of Canada on verge of collapse | Environment | The Guardian
I flew over Hudson Bay a few weeks ago, and it was full of ice. Ice area is running above normal.
Hudson Bay Polar Bear populations are listed as stable by Environment Canada.
The Guardian tells desperate lies to their readers about the climate day in and day out. The paper is a threat to democracy and civil society.
Thank you for identifying the current effort of foolish world leaders to hide the FORCE they cannot control:
http://omatumr.com/Photographs/Suns_core.htm
AGW (Anthropologic Global Warming) is the latest in a ~500 year effort by foolish world leaders to hide a FORCE they cannot control after Copernicus reported a giant fountain of energy at the gravitational center of the solar system in 1543.
Atomic bombs at the end of WWII revealed the fountain’s source of energy, but nations and the national academies of science were united into a giant, world-wide “Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Science (UN)Truths“ on 24 Oct 1945 to prevent public knowledge of NEUTRON REPULSION, the Force of Creation & Destruction of Matter in cores of galaxies, ordinary stars, some planets and all atoms heavier than ~150 amu (atomic mass units), including uranium and plutonium atoms that:
1. Vaporized Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6 & 9 Aug 1945 and
2. Induced insanity (loss of contact with reality) in humanity
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Introduction.pdf
FEAR, driven by Aston’s warning that Earth might be converted into a star [1], convinced leaders of independent nations and national academies of science to ignore the basic tenets of democratic government and science, and:
_ a.) Marie Curie’s admonition: “Nothing is to be feared. It is to be understood.”
_ b.) Max Planck’s insight [2] into reality: “There is no matter as such!” http://www.greggbraden.com/resources
_ c.) Paul Kuroda’s revelation [3] when viewing Hiroshima’s ruins in Aug 1945: “the beginning of the world may have been just like this.”
Now as NEUTRON REPULSION is revealed as the energy used to power the cosmos, the Sun and to endow us with “inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” . . .
the remainder of Max Planck’s 1944 speech [1] assures us, “There is no matter as such! All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particles of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together . . . We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter.”
We humans are each products of a FORCE guided by a conscious and intelligent Mind that mortal leaders cannot control or manipulate:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Benevolent_Universe.pdf
References:
1. F. W. Aston, “Mass spectra and isotopes,” Nobel Prize Lecture (12 Dec 1922). Aston’s promise and warning on nuclear energy are in the last paragraph. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1922/aston-lecture.pdf
2. Max Planck, a speech in Florence, Italy in 1944, entitled “Das Wesen der Materie” (The Essence/ Nature/ Character of Matter) Quelle: Archiv zur Geschichte der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Abt. Va, Rep. 11 Planck, Nr. 1797: http://www.greggbraden.com/resources
3. P. K. Kuroda, The Origin of the Chemical Elements and the Oklo Phenomenon (Springer, 165 pages, Dec 1982). The quote is on pp 2-3.
http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Chemical-Elements-Oklo-Phenomenon/dp/3540116796
The Guardian, Nature, Science, Proceedings of the Royal Society, the BBC, PBS, American Geophysical Union, Proceedings of the US National Academy of Sciences, etc., etc. have lied to the public since Stalin emerged victorious from WWII to unite nations (UN) and national academies of science (NAS) on 24 Oct 1945.
They are all a threat to democracy and civil society.
George Orwell recognized the danger and – although dying of tuberculosis – moved from London to the Scottish Isle of Jura in 1946 to start writing his futuristic warning to the public: “Nineteen Eighty-Four.”
This is what happens when you rely on models.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJfx0d-mmIo
So ice area two weeks ago should resurrect polar bears? That is RLY scientifik!
Who says polar bearsv need resurrecting? Data please, and no more childish emoting.
Hi again moron …. if you knew anything about polar bears you would already know that reduction in hunting bears was the main factor in their recovery. Now bugger off and get educated … here is a good place to start
http://polarbearscience.com/
Damn you polar bears-why can’t you listen to the AGW-Cult and finally start to die.
Being alive in such huge numbers is the worst form of climate-denying.
I guess we need to sent out some armed eco-jihadist(disguised as rednecks) and shoot 80% of your population and blame it on lack of ice and gun rights.
Two years ago, the Guardian announced that the Hudson Bay Polar Bear population was about to collapse.
====
Ten years ago the bear population of Hudson bay was stable…not declining. Environment Canada’s Polar Bear Technical Committee upgraded the status of Western Hudson Bay polar bears to stable, up from declining. At over 1000 bears, for the past 10 years.
The Inuit have petitioned the NWMB to allow them to kill more bears, because there are too many bears and they are a threat.
The whole Hudson Bay bear scam…is a scam…
The real numbers are that the bear population dropped by only 200 bears from 1984 – 2004, still leaving a population of over 900 bears. (if this trend continues) It was nothing more than extending another trend line….with absolutely no science or understanding behind it.
The current population is around 1200 bears, which is around 100 bears more than the highest count in 1984.
Interestingly, as I am sure most readers here already know,
the whole polar bear extinction fiasco began with a photograph of four
white blobs from a team in search of whales.
From a single event, a monumental extrapolation!
So help us out cfgj, is that scientific? or from where you are, scientifik.
Of course, about 50 t0 60 years ago the population was about 1/5th of what
it is today. That due to over hunting.
The obvious question, ‘Where were the alarms then when there really was a
legitimate concern?’
CFJG?
I don’t know jack shit about the status of polar bears in Hudson Bay – I’m just appalled to see what counts as “analysis” on this blog.
You should have just left it at, “I don’t know jack shit“. Then you would have actually made a cogent comment here for the first time.
“I don’t know jack shit”
thanks…we would have never figured that out on our own
analysis?…..so you have no idea who Dr. Susan Crockford is, do you?
polarbearscience says:
July 18, 2015 at 2:41 pm
Hudson Bay is still at least 30-40% ice covered on July 17th!
That is not necessarily good news, especially for the believers, they hate ice except when they don’t.
Probably not good news for the bears , either.
Bears hunt near the edge of the ice.. they apparently find seals rather yummy.
When the edge of the ice is further from land they have to travel further to hunt.
I’d like to nominate our friend Seth Borenstein for writing the same article practically 8 years apart:
http://news.yahoo.com/annual-checkup-earths-climate-says-were-hotter-water-143024316.html?bcmt=1437168225574-7a508c80-48ba-4c92-a0b3-63a0120e7934&bcmt_s=u#mediacommentsugc_container
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/071212-AP-arctic-melt.html
Being dead wrong does not mean you can’t keep repeating yourself.
National Geographic is ‘global warming’ 100% of the time. Zero reporting on any cold weather events that show cooling. Just like the Washington Post, NYT and Guardian.
Actually, Environment Canada biologist Nick Lunn leaked those numbers to Goldenberg before the government report had been officially released. When the report WAS released, it contained a correction to the numbers quoted in the Guardian article.
The methods were so different between the two survey years that it created a false impression of decline. When the same method was used for both data sets, there was no decline.
The IUCN PBSG now lists the WHB population size as 1030, and stable. There has been no trend in either breakup or freeze-up dates since 2001.
See updates to this post:
http://polarbearscience.com/2014/07/05/are-polar-bears-really-endangered/
Thanks Dr. Crockford
Don’t they still issue serval hundred permits, annually, to hunt bears?