The frequency of hot days in both Texas and Louisiana has declined over the past 90 years, but leading climate scientists have “teased out” that last summer’s heatwave was caused by “climate change.”
“When extreme weather events occur, can we tell if they’re directly attributable to climate change? A new study used the 2023 heat wave in Texas and Louisiana as a test case for establishing processes that tease out whether particular weather events are climate related.”
When is a heat wave just a heat wave, and when is it climate change? | ScienceDaily
Louisiana – State Climate Summaries 2022
“A similar drought wouldn’t have been as hot 50 years ago,” Schreck says. “That tells us the heat wave is directly related to climate change and that we will see even hotter heat waves in the future.”
They can now measure the temperature of a hypothetical heatwave 50 years ago! It’s magic, I tell you!
I was amazed when they could tell earth’s global mean temperature of 175 years ago – without instrumentation – and now they can measure weather that didn’t happen!
And they are fully qualified to tell us the future’s weather.
Science. Gotta luv it.
It is quiet a superhuman skill to be able to know the hypocr… hypothetical outcome of weather events from 50 years ago,
while at the same being unable to predict present weather events or even the number of storms
though magnitudes of more data and ” experts”are available now than from half a century ago.
Considering that Somalia lost 1/4 of its domestic animals 50 years ago as a result of drought
this expert may be lying.
(in the same year of picture perfect > 350ppm climate Bangladesh experienced probably the worst non-marxist-made famine of the 20th century as result of floods.)
Is a heat wave climate or weather? I vote for weather. And will there be heat waves in 2050? Hell yeah!
check this out! you will probably think it came from The Babylon Bee, but it didn’t. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2448831-plan-to-refreeze-arctic-sea-ice-shows-promise-in-first-tests/. it shows promise? whoever made that statement, I’ve got a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.
It won’t change the Arctic. But, it will sure line some lucky contractors’ pockets. One thing I see with so many government-backed scams, is that somebody is making jack off of them. It pays well to go along.
‘Teasing out’ is not a process I am familiar with, I should like to see the mathematical proofs supporting it. Or is it yet more guesswork applied to what amounts to the Rohrschach test of weather records.