We are a full half a standard deviation below the mean, with extent dropping by a minuscule amount every day.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Greg in NZ on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- conrad ziefle on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Margaret Smith on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Bruce of Newcastle on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- arn on Obliterating Bill Gates
- oeman50 on Harris To Win In A Blowout
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Everything
- arn on The End Of Everything
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Everything
Almost all of the ice loss is in the Barents Sea..
Ice in the Barents Sea is wide open and very vulnerable to wind.
They have been running ice breakers up there all winter because of the oil and gas field that was just discovered.
Russia has just built two new ice breakers just for the Barents Sea, and so have the Norwegians.
This is the new normal for the Barents Sea. Expect it to throw off the bell curve from now on.
This new data comports with the PIPS 3.0 that shows ice up to 6 + meters thick north of Greenland. Thick ice melts slower, obviously. It would be worse, I imagine, if the ice breakers didn’t keep the sea routes churned up and susceptible to winds.
The credibility of climate scientists has been a death spiral for quite some time.
Frightening stuff! We’re doomed!
with extent dropping by a minuscule amount every day
No El Nino warmth in Northern Hemisphere land and water surrounding Arctic ice.
I’m going to give it a shot and say 2011 (red) will end up higher than 2009 (blue) when minimum is said and done this year.